Podcast
Questions and Answers
What was the core controversy in the case?
What was the core controversy in the case?
A parcel of land, Lot No. 38-B.
Who filed the complaint against whom?
Who filed the complaint against whom?
The Spouses Baguispas were the original owners of Lot No. 38-B.
The Spouses Baguispas were the original owners of Lot No. 38-B.
True
Myrna Pasco filed a complaint for annulment of TCT and recovery of ownership in the _____ Court.
Myrna Pasco filed a complaint for annulment of TCT and recovery of ownership in the _____ Court.
Signup and view all the answers
What is the area of Lot No. 38-B?
What is the area of Lot No. 38-B?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the price agreed upon for Lot No. 38-B?
What was the price agreed upon for Lot No. 38-B?
Signup and view all the answers
Isabel executed an affidavit of self-adjudication more than one year after Antonio's death.
Isabel executed an affidavit of self-adjudication more than one year after Antonio's death.
Signup and view all the answers
What did the RTC declare regarding TCT No. T-62536?
What did the RTC declare regarding TCT No. T-62536?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Case Overview
- The Petition for Review on Certiorari involves Myrna C. Pasco (petitioner) against Isabel Cuenca, Romeo M. Ytang, Jr., and Esther C. Ytang (respondents).
- The case number is G.R. No. 214319, with a decision rendered on November 04, 2020.
Background of the Dispute
- The controversy centers on Lot No. 38-B in Katipunan, Zamboanga del Norte, measuring 336 square meters.
- Originally registered under spouses Antonio Baguispas and Isabel Cuenca-Baguispas (TCT No. T-12461).
- Myrna Pasco filed a complaint on September 9, 1999, for annulment of TCT, deed of sale, recovery of ownership, and damages.
Claims by Myrna Pasco
- In June 1986, the Spouses Baguispas offered to sell Lot No. 38-B to Pasco for ₱50,000, and they executed a notarized Deed of Sale on July 1, 1986.
- After Antonio's death in March 1987, Isabel executed an affidavit of self-adjudication and transferred the title to her name without Pasco's knowledge.
- Isabel sold the property to the Spouses Ytang, registering it under TCT No. T-62536.
Legal Action and Respondents' Defense
- Pasco contended TCT No. T-62536 was spurious and sought its cancellation along with the affidavit and deed of sale as null and void.
- Respondents claimed the sale to Pasco was fictitious and intended only to secure a loan with the Social Security System.
- They alleged that Isabel later requested Pasco to execute a deed of conveyance, which Pasco refused.
Ruling of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)
- On May 31, 2010, the RTC ruled in favor of Pasco, declaring TCT No. T-62536 and the subsequent Deed of Sale as null and void.
- Courts recognized Pasco as the legitimate owner of Lot 38-B and ordered the reinstatement of TCT No. T-12461 under the original owners.
Key Legal Principles
- The case emphasizes the importance of lawful ownership and genuine consideration in property transactions.
- The ruling highlights the legal consequences of self-adjudication without proper authority or knowledge of interested parties.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
This quiz examines the legal case of Myrna C. Pasco against Isabel Cuenca and others regarding the ownership of Lot No. 38-B in Zamboanga del Norte. It delves into the background of the dispute, claims made by Pasco, and the surrounding legal issues involved in the proceedings.
