Case Review Meeting Notes - November 2024

What type of case is being reviewed first in the meeting?

What detail about the dog bite case has not been established yet?

What does Justin Farahi emphasize as the first part of a case presentation?

How does Justin Farahi respond to the quality of the presentations?

Who is responsible for sending the 'quick six' details during the discussion?

What does Jeffrey Camarillo share when he begins his presentation?

What aspect of the dog bite case is still pending according to Jeffrey Camarillo?

Which term does Justin use to refer to the critical details required in case presentations?

What was the main concern expressed regarding Jeffrey's ability to ask a question?

How did Justin respond to Jeffrey's question about the client's injury claim?

What did Justin imply would happen if Jeffrey continued to be unprepared?

What was implied about the nature of the dialogue between Justin and Jeffrey?

What did Justin suggest Jeffrey should do if he struggled to ask a question?

What does Justin identify as the primary issue with Jeffrey's question?

What aspect of the client's action was being questioned in relation to the injury?

What structural suggestion did Justin imply for formulating questions?

What is the main consequence if a witness does not preserve video footage?

What might happen if a witness fails to meet a preservation request for evidence?

In the situation where a witness relates to the defendant, how could that relationship affect evidence preservation?

What role do witnesses play in evidence preservation during a trial?

What is spoliation of evidence?

Which outcome may occur if a witness cannot maintain necessary evidence during a case?

What should a witness do upon receiving a letter requesting evidence preservation?

What does it imply when a discussion centers around the consequences of not preserving evidence?

What term is used to describe the failure to preserve evidence by a defendant?

What are the two possible judicial outcomes if evidence is not preserved?

What does the speaker suggest is necessary for effective public speaking in a training environment?

How does spoliation affect a defendant's liability in court?

What might occur if a witness fails to preserve evidence?

Which of the following is NOT a consequence of failing to preserve evidence?

What does the speaker want the trainees to feel towards their training?

Which of the following best represents the speaker's attitude towards the training process?

What happens if Ryan receives a letter about an accident outside his house but does not keep a copy of it?

What is the significance of preserving evidence in relation to a lawsuit?

What does Justin suggest about the enforcement of evidence preservation among individuals?

Why is it difficult to prove that evidence was received by an individual?

In the discussion, what does Justin imply about the potential legal repercussions for not preserving evidence?

What does Ryan believe happens upon receiving a letter regarding a car accident?

What does Justin mean by stating there is 'no non-compliance punishment'?

What legal action could theoretically be taken if someone fails to preserve evidence?

What is the primary goal of the letter discussed in the conversation?

What strategy is suggested to encourage witnesses to care about the client's situation?

According to the discussion, which element should be emphasized in the letter to create urgency?

What metaphor was used in the conversation to describe the approach needed in the letter?

What is suggested as a key component to empower witnesses in the letter?

What tone should the letter ideally convey to engage the witnesses?

What was one suggested action to include in the letter for affected witnesses?

What rationale is provided for why witnesses might have to face legal consequences?