3 Questions
According to the landmark case of Carroll v. United States, the 'automobile exception' to the written warrant requirement was established because
It is not practical to obtain a warrant when searching a vehicle.
According to Chief Justice Taft in Carroll v. United States, what constitutes a valid search and seizure without a warrant?
All of the above.
In Carroll v. United States, the Supreme Court recognized a necessary difference between searching a vehicle and searching a structure because
Vehicles can be quickly moved out of the jurisdiction.
Test your knowledge on the landmark case of Carroll v. United States and the establishment of the "automobile exception" to the written warrant requirement by the United States Supreme Court. Explore Chief Justice Taft's declaration and the concept of probable cause in search and seizure.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
