Carroll v
3 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

According to the landmark case of Carroll v. United States, the 'automobile exception' to the written warrant requirement was established because

  • The search and seizure of vehicles is always considered valid.
  • It is not practical to obtain a warrant when searching a vehicle. (correct)
  • The Fourth Amendment does not apply to searches of automobiles.
  • The Supreme Court wanted to protect the privacy of vehicle owners.

    • According to Chief Justice Taft in Carroll v. United States, what constitutes a valid search and seizure without a warrant?

  • A belief that an automobile contains illegal merchandise.
  • Probable cause to believe that a vehicle is carrying contraband.
  • The presence of a competent official authorized to search.
  • All of the above. (correct)

    • In Carroll v. United States, the Supreme Court recognized a necessary difference between searching a vehicle and searching a structure because

  • Structures are protected by the Fourth Amendment.
  • Contraband is more likely to be found in vehicles.
  • Vehicles can be quickly moved out of the jurisdiction. (correct)
  • A warrant is always required to search a structure.

    • More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser