Podcast
Podcast
Podcast
Something went wrong
Questions and Answers
Questions and Answers
In Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Co (1893), the defendant company offered to pay £100 to a person who smoked a 'smokeball' ______ times a week
In Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Co (1893), the defendant company offered to pay £100 to a person who smoked a 'smokeball' ______ times a week
three
Mrs. C contracted influenza after using the smokeball and the actual act of sniffing the smokeball was considered ______
Mrs. C contracted influenza after using the smokeball and the actual act of sniffing the smokeball was considered ______
consideration
Harvey v Facey (1893) involved a telegram exchange about the sale of Bumper Hall Pen, where the defendants telegram was not considered an ______ but an indication of the minimum price
Harvey v Facey (1893) involved a telegram exchange about the sale of Bumper Hall Pen, where the defendants telegram was not considered an ______ but an indication of the minimum price
offer
According to the Privy Council in Harvey v Facey (1893), the plaintiffs' second telegram could not be considered as ______
According to the Privy Council in Harvey v Facey (1893), the plaintiffs' second telegram could not be considered as ______
FISHER v BELL (1961) involved a shopkeeper displaying a flick knife in the window despite it being an offence to 'offer for sale' a 'flick knife' as per the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act ______
FISHER v BELL (1961) involved a shopkeeper displaying a flick knife in the window despite it being an offence to 'offer for sale' a 'flick knife' as per the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act ______
The shopkeeper in FISHER v BELL (1961) was prosecuted in the magistrates' court but was not convicted as the knife had not, in law, been ______ for sale
The shopkeeper in FISHER v BELL (1961) was prosecuted in the magistrates' court but was not convicted as the knife had not, in law, been ______ for sale
Lord Parker CJ stated: "It is perfectly clear that according to the ordinary law of contract the display of an article with a price on it in a shop window is merely an invitation to treat. It is in no sense an ______ for sale the acceptance of which constitutes a contract." PSGB v Boots (1953) The Court of Appeal ruled that the defendants' self-service shop sold certain drugs under the supervision of a registered pharmacist. Somervell LJ stated that a contract is completed when the seller accepts an ______, unlike an ordinary shop where goods are displayed. Partridge v Crittenden (1968) Bramblefinch cocks, Bramblefinch hens, 25s each The High Court quashed a conviction for ______ing certain wild birds for sale. Lord Parker CJ argued that advertisements should be interpreted as invitations to treat, not sales. Lord Herschell in Grainger v Gough (Surveyor of Taxes) AC 325 stated that a price list does not constitute an ______ to supply unlimited quantities of a specific wine, as it would limit the merchant's stock."
Lord Parker CJ stated: "It is perfectly clear that according to the ordinary law of contract the display of an article with a price on it in a shop window is merely an invitation to treat. It is in no sense an ______ for sale the acceptance of which constitutes a contract." PSGB v Boots (1953) The Court of Appeal ruled that the defendants' self-service shop sold certain drugs under the supervision of a registered pharmacist. Somervell LJ stated that a contract is completed when the seller accepts an ______, unlike an ordinary shop where goods are displayed. Partridge v Crittenden (1968) Bramblefinch cocks, Bramblefinch hens, 25s each The High Court quashed a conviction for ______ing certain wild birds for sale. Lord Parker CJ argued that advertisements should be interpreted as invitations to treat, not sales. Lord Herschell in Grainger v Gough (Surveyor of Taxes) AC 325 stated that a price list does not constitute an ______ to supply unlimited quantities of a specific wine, as it would limit the merchant's stock."
The Court of Appeal ruled that the defendants' self-service shop sold certain drugs under the supervision of a registered pharmacist. Somervell LJ stated that a contract is completed when the seller accepts an ______, unlike an ordinary shop where goods are displayed.
The Court of Appeal ruled that the defendants' self-service shop sold certain drugs under the supervision of a registered pharmacist. Somervell LJ stated that a contract is completed when the seller accepts an ______, unlike an ordinary shop where goods are displayed.
Bramblefinch cocks, Bramblefinch hens, 25s each The High Court quashed a conviction for offering certain wild birds for sale. Lord Parker CJ argued that advertisements should be interpreted as invitations to ______, not sales.
Bramblefinch cocks, Bramblefinch hens, 25s each The High Court quashed a conviction for offering certain wild birds for sale. Lord Parker CJ argued that advertisements should be interpreted as invitations to ______, not sales.
Lord Herschell in Grainger v Gough (Surveyor of Taxes) AC 325 stated that a price list does not constitute an ______ to supply unlimited quantities of a specific wine, as it would limit the merchant's stock.
Lord Herschell in Grainger v Gough (Surveyor of Taxes) AC 325 stated that a price list does not constitute an ______ to supply unlimited quantities of a specific wine, as it would limit the merchant's stock.
Questions and Answers
Something went wrong
Flashcards
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
Flashcards
Something went wrong
Study Notes
Study Notes
- Displaying an article with a price tag in a shop window is considered an invitation to treat, not an offer for sale according to Lord Parker CJ in PSGB v Boots (1953).
- In Somervell LJ's ruling in the same case, it was stated that a contract is formed when a seller accepts an offer, unlike in traditional shops where goods are displayed.
- Lord Parker CJ argued in Partridge v Crittenden (1968) that advertisements should be seen as invitations to treat and not as offers.
- Lord Herschell in Grainger v Gough (Surveyor of Taxes) AC 325 clarified that a price list does not constitute an offer to supply unlimited quantities of a specific product.
- In Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893), it was established that the act of using the smokeball as advertised constituted valid consideration, and the company's advertisement was deemed a valid offer.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Study Notes
Something went wrong
