Canada's Balance of Power: Judiciary vs. Legislature
22 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What does Section 1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms allow the government to do regarding Charter rights?

It permits the government to limit Charter rights if those limitations are 'reasonable' and 'demonstrably justified'.

What is the Oakes Test, and what criteria does it require the government to demonstrate?

The Oakes Test is used to justify limitations on Charter rights, requiring pressing and substantial concerns, rational connection, minimal impairment, and proportionality.

How does Section 24 of the Charter empower the judiciary?

Section 24 allows the judiciary to strike down or reinterpret legislation as unconstitutional, regardless of legislative intent.

What was the outcome of the Ontario court's ruling regarding the Safe Streets Act in 2024?

<p>The court found that several provisions of the Safe Streets Act violated constitutional rights and struck down the most restrictive parts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What potential problems arise from the judiciary's ability to reinterpret legislation?

<p>Judicial interpretation can extend beyond legislative intent, leading to unintended policy outcomes and undermining the legislative branch.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what ways does judicial review affect democratic accountability in Canada?

<p>Judicial review can undermine democratic accountability by allowing courts to overrule decisions made by elected representatives.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe one criterion of the Oakes Test and explain its significance.

<p>Minimal impairment requires that the limitation on rights must not unnecessarily restrict the right, ensuring that rights are not eroded without justification.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What role does the judiciary play under Section 24 in protecting individual rights?

<p>The judiciary acts as a guardian of individual rights by reviewing legislation to ensure it adheres to constitutional principles.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What critique is often made by the political right regarding the judiciary's role in Canada's Charter?

<p>The political right critiques that the judiciary violates democratic principles by exercising policymaking powers instead of elected legislative officials.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is Section 33 of the Charter and how does it function?

<p>Section 33, known as the notwithstanding clause, allows legislatures to override certain Charter rights for up to five years, subject to renewal.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why might elected officials be hesitant to invoke Section 33?

<p>Elected officials are often skeptical of invoking Section 33 due to fear of political backlash from the electorate.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Give an example of how Section 33 was used in relation to the Supreme Court’s decision in Ford v. Quebec.

<p>After the court struck down parts of Bill 101, the Quebec government invoked Section 33 to reinstate the French-only sign law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the implications of judicial review under Section 24 of the Charter for democratic accountability?

<p>Judicial review undermines democratic accountability by enabling courts to nullify legislation made by elected representatives.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How can the 'living tree' interpretation of the Constitution potentially impact the legislative process?

<p>The 'living tree' interpretation may lead courts to extend beyond the original legislative intent, causing unintended policy outcomes.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What role do supporters of judicial review argue courts play in a multicultural society like Canada’s?

<p>Supporters argue that courts protect the rights of marginalized groups and prevent majoritarianism from infringing on minority rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What significant case did the Supreme Court of Canada decide in 1988 that exemplified the judiciary's role in protecting rights?

<p>In 1988, R. v. Morgentaler was a landmark case where the Supreme Court struck down restrictive abortion laws, affirming reproductive autonomy.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What risk does over-reliance on courts pose for the legislative branch in policy-making?

<p>Over-reliance on courts risks creating a cycle of legislative inaction, undermining democratic governance.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How might Section 33 be viewed as a tool for promoting democratic accountability?

<p>Section 33 could be reclaimed as a tool for promoting accountability by allowing legislatures to engage collaboratively with courts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What concerns have been raised about the 'living tree' doctrine in relation to societal values?

<p>Concerns have been raised that the 'living tree' doctrine can impose significant policy changes without sufficient democratic debate.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what ways can judicial dominance in policymaking affect public trust?

<p>Judicial dominance can erode public trust in democratic institutions as contentious decisions are deferred to unelected judges.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the potential impact of the judiciary acting as policymakers in a democracy?

<p>When the judiciary acts as policymakers, it can undermine democratic processes and reduce citizen influence over legislation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the political stigma surrounding the use of Section 33?

<p>The political stigma surrounding Section 33 often discourages governments from invoking it, affecting their capacity to override rights violations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Canada's Balance of Power: Judiciary vs. Legislature

  • Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms (sections 1, 24, and 33) structure the balance between the judiciary and legislature.
  • Section 1 (Reasonable Limits) allows government limitations on Charter rights if "reasonable and demonstrably justified" using the Oakes Test.
  • Oakes Test requires demonstrating a pressing and substantial concern, a rational connection to the limitation's aims, minimal impairment of the right, and proportionality.
  • Courts ultimately decide if a limitation is justifiable.
  • Section 24 (Judicial Review) allows courts to strike down or reinterpret unconstitutional legislation, regardless of legislative intent.
  • The judiciary's active role in protecting rights is demonstrated through actions like striking down provisions of the Safe Streets Act for infringing on fundamental freedoms.
  • Section 33 (Notwithstanding Clause) lets legislatures temporarily override specific Charter rights (sections 2, 7-14, and 15) for up to five years (renewable).
  • This clause is rarely used due to political stigma and fear of public backlash.
  • Invoking Section 33 in Quebec's Bill 101 case exemplifies the tension between the branches.

Judicial Review and Democratic Accountability

  • Judicial review (Section 24) undermines democratic accountability by allowing courts to overrule elected representatives' decisions.
  • This concentration of power in the unelected judiciary branch weakens democratic processes.
  • Over-reliance on courts for contentious issues risks eroding public trust in democratic institutions and fostering dependency.

Judicial Interpretation and Policy Outcomes

  • "Living tree" doctrine of interpretation allows courts to interpret the constitution with modern societal values in mind.
  • This can lead to policy changes without sufficient public debate and weakens the legislative process.
  • Supporters say courts safeguard marginalized rights, acting as checks against legislative majoritarianism.
  • Historically, courts have intervened on contentious issues like abortion (e.g., R v. Morgentaler).

Reforming the Balance

  • While judicial oversight is vital to protecting marginalized groups, the legislative branch holds primary responsibility for policy changes reflecting societal values.
  • The infrequent use of Section 33 reduces its utility as a counterbalance to judicial power.
  • Reframing Section 33 as a tool for collaboration between the branches may restore balance.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Description

This quiz explores the intricate balance of power between the judiciary and legislature in Canada, focusing on key sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. You will learn about reasonable limits, the Oakes Test, judicial review, and the Notwithstanding Clause. Test your understanding of how these elements interact to protect rights in Canada.

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Open
Browser
Browser