Biblical Analysis: Propitiation and Faith

According to Romans 3:25, Jesus was not put forward as a propitiation by His blood.

The authors of the two commentaries on the word elasmos have the same views on its meaning.

The phrase 'the whole world' in John 1:7 implies that only individual salvation is necessary.

The word elasmos does not carry the concept of Jesus' death.

Cross-reference analysis is not a useful tool in biblical interpretation.

The Greek noun Chilasmos in the passage should be translated with a definite article because of its specificity

The use of the anarthrous noun in the passage indicates that Jesus is not a specific propitiation

The speaker considers the translation of Chilasmos with a definite article to be incorrect

The passage is discussing the concept of justification in relation to the elect

The cross reference for the passage is 1 John 2:3

The Pistic Trajectory refers to the movement from disobedience to obedience.

John's writings focus solely on the Pistic Trajectory.

Good works are sufficient for salvation according to the passage.

The author of the passage learned about the importance of obedience through Scripture study.

Quadrant One represents unbelievers who do good works.

The Greek word parakleton is used to describe the Holy Spirit and Jesus in John 14:16 and chapter two, verse one.

The purpose of John's writing is to condemn sin.

The cross-reference John 14:16 is related to the concept of Jesus being the Advocate.

The conjunction in the original text should be translated as 'if' instead of 'and' due to its adversative nature.

The Greek word parakleton is used exclusively to describe Jesus in John's gospel.

In John's gospel, the paracletos refers to Jesus, whereas in 1 John, it refers to the Holy Spirit.

The author of the passage is quoting from John 1:9-10.

C.H.Dodd argued that the stylistic differences between John's gospel and the epistles suggest they have the same writer.

W.F.Howard replied to C.H.Dodd's article on stylistic differences between John's gospel and the epistles.

The passage is discussing the concept of sin in the Christian life.

In 1 John, the en auteu sometimes points up and sometimes points down or ahead in the context.

The use of a colon in the translation of 1 John 2:3 is necessary to indicate a conditional clause.

The command to keep His commandments in 1 John 2:3 is a call to apathetic obedience.

The phrase 'keep his commandments' in 1 John 2:3 echoes the words of Christ in Matthew 17.

The test of knowing God in 1 John 2:3 is a one-time event.

The Greek noun 'Chilasmos' in the passage should be translated with a definite article because of its specificity

The passage is discussing the concept of justification in relation to the elect

John's writings focus solely on the Pistic Trajectory

The cross reference for the passage is John 14:21

The use of the anarthrous noun in the passage indicates that Jesus is a specific propitiation

The speaker believes that good works are sufficient for salvation

The passage is saying that the Christian is committed to keep and conform to God's word

The author of the passage learned about the importance of obedience through personal experience

The love of God is given to us as a gift and blessing from the Lord when we disobey his word

The passage suggests that the Christian can be perfect in this life