Arguments from Analogy Flashcards
16 Questions
100 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What are analogies commonly used for?

  • Deductive reasoning
  • Inductive reasoning (correct)
  • Mathematical proofs
  • Statistical analysis
  • How many premises do arguments from analogy have?

    3

    What does it mean for arguments from analogy to be inductive?

    To not evaluate as valid or invalid but as strong or weak.

    What is disjunctive syllogism?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What is modus ponens?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What is denying the antecedent?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What is modus tollens?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What is affirming the consequent?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What is hypothetical syllogism?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What are arguments?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What is a worldview?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What does cogent mean?

    Signup and view all the answers

    What does fallacious mean?

    Signup and view all the answers

    How are arguments from analogy evaluated?

    <p>As strong or weak.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the standard form for arguments from analogy?

    <ol> <li>Object A has properties P, Q, R; 2. Objects B, C also have properties P, Q, R; 3. Objects B, C have property X; 4. Therefore, Object A probably has property X.</li> </ol> Signup and view all the answers

    What are the general features in analogy standard form?

    <ol> <li>Three premises; 2. First two premises identify compared objects and similarities; 3. The third premise identifies another property shared.</li> </ol> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Arguments from Analogy

    • Analogies utilize inductive reasoning, drawing conclusions based on similarities between two different things.
    • Example: Comparing a new car to an old, reliable model to infer potential reliability of the new model.
    • Arguments from analogy consist of three premises highlighting the comparison.

    Key Logical Forms

    • Disjunctive Syllogism: A logical structure that involves a disjunction (either/or statement) and deduces one of the alternatives is false.
    • Modus Ponens: A valid argument form where if 'A implies B' and 'A' is true, then 'B' must be true.
    • Denying the Antecedent: A fallacy that occurs when one assumes that if 'A implies B' and 'A' is false, then 'B' must also be false.
    • Modus Tollens: A valid form that concludes 'not A' from 'A implies B' and 'not B'.
    • Affirming the Consequent: A fallacy which wrongly infers 'A' is true from 'A implies B' and 'B' is true.
    • Hypothetical Syllogism: Involves two conditional statements to derive a new conditional statement.

    Understanding Arguments

    • An argument is a set of statements where premises lead to a conclusion.
    • A worldview shapes how one interprets arguments and evidence.

    Quality of Arguments

    • Cogent: Describes a strong, well-supported argument.
    • Fallacious: Refers to arguments that contain errors in reasoning, rendering them invalid.

    Characteristics of Arguments from Analogy

    • Arguments from analogy are inherently inductive, differing from deductive reasoning.
    • They are commonly employed in legal and moral reasoning contexts, establishing the similarities between cases for judgments.

    Evaluating Analogies

    • Analogies are assessed as strong or weak, rather than valid or invalid.
    • Evaluating analogies allows for flexibility in reasoning while maintaining criteria for credibility.

    Structure of Analogical Arguments

    • A standard form for arguments from analogy typically consists of identifying properties shared between objects, followed by the conclusion that the first object will likely share another property.
    • Essential features include:
      • Three premises are required.
      • Initial premises outline comparable objects and their known shared properties.
      • The conclusion draws on an additional property presumed to be shared based on the established similarities.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the concept of analogies in inductive reasoning with these flashcards. This quiz delves into how similarities between two things can infer further conclusions, enhancing your understanding of logical reasoning. Perfect for students looking to improve their critical thinking skills.

    More Like This

    Arguments for the Existence of God
    12 questions
    Statistics: Syllogisms and Generalizations
    13 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser