Anselm's Ontological Argument and Criticisms

Study Notes

Ontology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the study of existence and being. One of its most famous arguments is the ontological argument, which aims to prove the existence of God through reasoning based on concepts of what exists and how it can exist. The argument was first presented by St. Anselm of Canterbury in his treatise "Proslogion," written around 1078 AD, although the roots of this form of argument can be traced back to Plato.

Anselm's Argument

Anselm of Canterbury developed the ontological argument to demonstrate the necessity of God's existence, using the concept of perfection. He argued that the idea of an all-good, all-powerful being would necessarily require the existence of such a being. Anselm asserted that any creature that could conceive of an all-perfect being must believe in its existence since it is more perfect if it exists than does not exist. This led him to conclude that God is a necessary existent, given the nature of what we mean when we say something has maximum greatness.

However, Anselm's argument was criticized for several reasons. Some critics argue that the concept of a being more perfect if it exists than if it doesn't contradicts itself, while others contend that the argument relies too heavily on the ability of humans to define God accurately. Nevertheless, Anselm's argument remains influential because it provides a structure for discussing divine properties and their implications for existence.

Guarino's Criticism

Guarino Veronese, an Italian philosopher from the Renaissance, offered a critique of Anselm's ontological argument. He argued that the concept of a being greater than which nothing greater can be conceived is contradictory because the concept of a greater being implies the existence of something that could be greater still, thereby contradicting itself. Guarino's criticism raises important questions about the coherence of the idea of a being that is greater than any other conceivable being.

Kant's Objection

Immanuel Kant, a prominent philosopher in the Enlightenment period, also criticized Anselm's ontological argument. He claimed that the argument is problematic because it conflates the concept of God as a necessary existent with the concept of God as a being that exists in reality. Kant further asserted that the ontological argument fails because it presupposes the existence of a necessary existent, which is itself an unjustified assumption.

In summary, the ontological argument, as presented by Anselm of Canterbury, has been subjected to criticism from philosophers like Guarino Veronese and Immanuel Kant. Despite these criticisms, the ontological argument remains an important part of philosophical discourse, serving as a catalyst for discussions on the nature of existence and the concept of God. Regardless of the debate about its validity, the ontological argument continues to shape the thinking and discussions surrounding ontology and existence.

Description

Explore Anselm of Canterbury's ontological argument for the existence of God, along with criticisms from philosophers like Guarino Veronese and Immanuel Kant. Delve into discussions on divine properties, existence, and the nature of God as a necessary existent.