Administrative Law Quiz
149 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the fundamental principle of Administrative Law that illegality reflects?

  • Public bodies are entitled to act beyond the confines of their powers if they deem it necessary.
  • Public bodies can act in ways that seem reasonable and fair.
  • Public bodies have the power to interpret legislation as they see fit.
  • Public bodies are not entitled to act in excess of their powers, or 'ultra vires'. (correct)
  • In the context of judicial review, what does 'illegality' mean, according to Lord Diplock?

  • The decision-maker must accurately understand and apply the law that governs their decision-making powers. (correct)
  • The decision-maker can make decisions based solely on political considerations.
  • The decision-maker must prioritize expediency over legal correctness.
  • The decision-maker can interpret the law freely as they wish.
  • Which of the following scenarios would be considered acting 'ultra vires' in its traditional, narrow sense?

  • A local council sets up a free library for residents outside the area.
  • A government agency fails to consult the public on a new policy.
  • A police officer arrests someone for jaywalking, even though this is not a power. (correct)
  • A judge interprets a law in a way that benefits the government.
  • What would be considered a breach of the rules of illegality, using the definitions from the content?

    <p>A public body makes a decision without taking into account important factors related to the decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, what is NOT an example of acting ultra vires?

    <p>A public body doing something reasonably incidental to an existing power.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the Attorney General v Fulham Corporation case demonstrate about the powers of local authorities?

    <p>That local authorities must remain strictly within the powers granted to them by law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of the content, what does 'ultra vires' generally refer to?

    <p>A decision that goes beyond the legal boundaries of power given to a body.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is the doctrine of illegality important in Administrative Law?

    <p>It ensures that the actions of the executive are within legal limits.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of judicial review, what does the principle of legality primarily concern?

    <p>Presuming that Parliament does not intend to infringe fundamental rights without explicit authorization.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case is most associated with the development of the principle of legality in UK law?

    <p>R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the core definition of an 'error of law' in judicial review?

    <p>A misinterpretation of the legal rules by a decision-maker.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the significance of the Anisminic Ltd case in the context of judicial review of errors of law?

    <p>It expanded the scope to include all errors of law, regardless of jurisdiction.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a situation where courts might be unwilling to review an error of law?

    <p>Where the error of law is decisive to the decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the House of Lords rule in R v Monopolies Commission, ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd regarding the interpretation of broad terms?

    <p>That the court should only intervene if the decision-maker's conclusion is irrational.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R (Forge Care Homes Ltd) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, what was the core error made by the Health Board concerning funding?

    <p>They misinterpreted the funding of care as set out in the Health and Social Care Act 2001.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Historically, how did courts initially approach challenges based on errors of fact?

    <p>They were generally resistant to such challenges, seeing it as interfering too much with the executive.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of these is now recognized as fact based for judicial review?

    <p>An error about a pre-existing fact which must be determined to grant jurisdiction, a 'precedent fact'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is meant by 'precedent facts' in the context of judicial review?

    <p>Factual determinations that a decision-maker must make before exercising a certain power (jurisdiction).</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a 'no evidence for a fact' error?

    <p>A decision where there is no factual basis to support it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How is a 'mistake of established fact' defined in the context of judicial review?

    <p>An ignorance of or a mistake about a fact which is definitively and certainly true.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes the relationship between ultra vires and the principle of legality?

    <p>The principle of legality can be seen as an extension of the ultra vires doctrine.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main difference between the early approach to errors of law and the approach following Anisminic Ltd?

    <p>Errors of law were only reviewable if they affected jurisdictional matters prior to <em>Anisminic</em>.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstance would a court NOT review the decisions of an inferior court for an error of law?

    <p>If the first instance judges decision was to be final, by an Act of Parliament.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What example did Warrington LJ provide in Short v Poole Corporation to illustrate unreasonable decision-making?

    <p>A teacher being dismissed simply for having red hair.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Lord Diplock in the GCHQ case, what term did he prefer to 'unreasonableness'?

    <p>Irrationality</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Lord Donaldson's concern regarding Lord Diplock's definition of 'irrationality'?

    <p>It implied a lack of mental capacity of the decision-maker.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Lord Cooke say about Lord Greene's formulation of unreasonableness?

    <p>He criticised it as being tautologous and exaggerated.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to De Smith & Jowell, which of the following is a class of unreasonableness identified by the courts?

    <p>Decisions that violate constitutional principles</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What category does the failure to provide a comprehensive chain of reasoning fall under?

    <p>A sub-category of unreasonableness, often described as irrationality.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In West Glamorgan CC v Rafferty, why was the local authority's decision to evict travellers found to be unreasonable?

    <p>Because the local authority had not tried to provide temporary sites.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which issue was central to the decision in Re Duffy regarding the Parades Commission of Northern Ireland?

    <p>The need for the commission to be impartial and independent.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why was the Secretary of State's decision in R v Secretary of State for Environment, ex parte Fielder Estates (Canvey Ltd) considered unreasonable?

    <p>Because there was no logical reason why an objector could not have provided their views in writing.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte Luff, why was the challenge on the grounds of irrationality unsuccessful?

    <p>Because the Health Secretary had considered multiple factors, including opposing viewpoints.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the concept of 'Tameside duty' refer to, as mentioned in the text?

    <p>The duty to make adequate inquiry before making a decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the outcome of R v North-West Lancashire Health Authority, ex parte A, D & G?

    <p>The Health Authority's general policy towards those seeking gender reassignment surgery was found to be unlawful.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of judicial review, what does the term 'tautologous' mean, as used by Lord Cooke?

    <p>Circular or redundant in its explanation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT considered a material defect in the decision-making process, as discussed in the context of unreasonableness?

    <p>The use of inappropriate language by a decision-maker.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What common thread runs through the cases that are considered examples of irrationality?

    <p>There is a failure to properly consider relevant factors, or there are logical flaws in the decision-making process.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstances does Section 101 of the Local Government Act 1972 allow for the delegation of decision-making powers?

    <p>To committees, council officers, or another local authority.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the Carltona principle, what presumption do courts make regarding a government minister's ability to delegate discretion?

    <p>Ministers are presumed to be able to delegate to civil servants within their department.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of the Carltona principle, who remains politically accountable for delegated decisions?

    <p>The minister to their department.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case extended the application of the Carltona principle beyond central government?

    <p>DPP v Haw</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the case of DPP v Haw, what is an implied power for an office such as Chief Constable, if it is created by statue?

    <p>An implied power to delegate responsibilities if inevitable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Oladehinde, who was deemed able to make deportation decisions?

    <p>Immigration Inspectors within the Home Office.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What key factor was lacking in the case of R(Bourgass) v Secretary of State for Justice that led to the court's decision?

    <p>An insufficiently close link between the prison authority and the ministry to ensure necessary accountability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case is most associated with the principle of 'Wednesbury unreasonableness'?

    <p>Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation, what condition did the local authority impose on the cinema?

    <p>That no children under the age of 15 be admitted on Sundays.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main purpose of the 'Wednesbury test'?

    <p>To provide a threshold for when courts can interfere with unreasonable executive decisions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Lord Greene MR in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation, when can a court interfere with a decision?

    <p>If a decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could have made it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Lord Wrenbury emphasize in Roberts v Hopwood regarding decision-making by public bodies?

    <p>Public bodies must use their reason to ascertain the correct course.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the concept of 'unreasonableness' in judicial review involve?

    <p>A decision that is illogical, perverse or irrational.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what context did the Carltona principle originate?

    <p>Decisions within central government involving a minister.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key distinction between the application of the Carltona principle and the principle applied in DPP v Haw?

    <p>The Carltona principle is solely applicable to ministerial contexts, whereas <em>DPP v Haw</em> extends a similar principle to other public offices, but only if deemed necessary.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind, what was Lord Ackner's view on the application of proportionality by UK courts?

    <p>Proportionality should be applied only when the ECHR is incorporated into domestic law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R (Rogers) v Swindon NHS Primacy Care Trust, what was the core reason the health authority's policy was deemed irrational?

    <p>The policy applied different funding criteria to women within the same eligible group based on 'exceptional circumstances'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the key failing of the Treasury in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) that led to the court finding its action unlawful?

    <p>The Treasury’s actions were not a proportionate response and had singled out Bank Mellat when similar risks were posed by other institutions .</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the fundamental problem with the Wednesbury test?

    <p>It set an excessively high threshold of 'extreme unreasonableness' for judicial intervention.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Lord Steyn in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, how does proportionality generally compare to Wednesbury unreasonableness?

    <p>Proportionality involves a more intense level of review which could lead to different results.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to R (DSD and NBV) v The Parole Board, what was the main irrationality identified in the Parole Board's initial decision-making process?

    <p>The Board did not initially probe the evidence presented thoroughly and failed to carry out further investigations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the 'Tameside duty' primarily require of decision-makers?

    <p>To take reasonable steps to understand the relevant information needed to make a rational decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Lord Slynn's suggestion in R (Alconbury) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions regarding the relationship between Wednesbury unreasonableness and proportionality?

    <p>The time has come to establish proportionality as an established principle within administrative law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Dyson LJ's view in Association of British Civilian Internees - Far East Region v Secretary of State for Defence, in relation to the argument for replacing Wednesbury unreasonableness with proportionality?

    <p>The Court of Appeal lacked the authority to overrule existing precedents.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R (Plantagenet Alliance) v Secretary of State for Justice, what did the court determine as the scope of the 'Tameside duty'?

    <p>It is a duty of rationality, where the absent information must render the decision irrational for it to be unlawful.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle is demonstrated in Wheeler v Leicester City Council concerning unreasonable decisions?

    <p>That authorities should avoid taking actions that punish groups for the legal actions of individuals.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the Supreme Court's view on proportionality as compared to Wednesbury unreasonableness?

    <p>Proportionality was a more forensic test but could operate with varying intensity.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case demonstrates that a decision can be deemed Wednesbury unreasonable even if it is not illogical?

    <p><em>Wheeler v Leicester City Council</em></p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Lord Neuberger in Keyu v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what was the proper mechanism to replace Wednesbury unreasonableness with proportionality standard?

    <p>A full panel of the UK Supreme Court is required.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the case of R (Law Society of England and Wales) v Lord Chancellor highlight in relation to financial matters?

    <p>The need for thorough financial assessments to support government policy.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Youssef v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what did Lord Carnwath suggest about the future of the proportionality standard of review?

    <p>The Court should seek an authoritative review of the proportionality principle in public law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement best reflects the ongoing debate regarding proportionality in UK administrative law?

    <p>There is a continuing intensive academic debate on the future role of proportionality.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the main safeguard in the Counter-Terrorism Act 2007, that related to the direction issued in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2)?

    <p>The principle of proportionality in relation to national risks.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Given the various cases presented in this document, what is the main trend in judicial thought regarding proportionality as a standard of judicial review?

    <p>An increasingly positive view towards integrating it more generally within administrative law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What aspect of the Tameside duty was emphasized in R (Plantagenet Alliance)?

    <p>The rational basis for decisions taken not the procedures followed.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what way did Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) challenge the actions of the Treasury?

    <p>By demonstrating that the Treasury's response was disproportionate.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case made the connection between rationality and illegality by discussing the need for an adequate enquiry by decision makers?

    <p><em>R (DSD and NBV) v The Parole Board</em></p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was particularly criticised about the decision in Wheeler v Leicester City Council?

    <p>The decision constituted improper punishment of the club members who were neutral.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Lord Sumption identify as a key issue in the court’s approach to the decision made by the Treasury in Bank Mellat?

    <p>That the Treasury’s explanation to Parliament about the direction did not match that given during the resultant legal challenge.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes the outcome of R (Plantagenet Alliance) in relation to the Secretary of State for Justice?

    <p>The Secretary of State was found to have acted rationally.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Norney case, why was the Home Office's policy deemed unreasonable?

    <p>The policy resulted in prisoners serving significantly longer detention periods than if referrals were made earlier.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a key reason for the court's decision to quash the local authority's decision in R v Barnsley MBC, ex parte Hook?

    <p>The punishment was excessive, disproportionately affecting Mr Hook’s ability to earn a living.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle did the court uphold in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte McCartney?

    <p>Similar cases should be treated consistently, and arbitrary decision-making should be avoided.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Percy v Hall, what was the main argument against the military byelaws that the court ultimately rejected?

    <p>The byelaws were not clear enough, so those not familiar would not know the boundaries of the military area.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is meant by 'intensity of review' in the context of judicial review?

    <p>The degree to which the courts will scrutinise decisions made by public bodies.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, what is the primary factor that influences the intensity of judicial review?

    <p>The degree to which the decision affects fundamental/human rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why are courts more likely to closely scrutinise decisions impacting fundamental rights?

    <p>Courts have a constitutional duty to protect fundamental rights, and judges are experienced in this area.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, what type of decisions are subject to a lower intensity of review?

    <p>Decisions concerning broad policy questions, such as resource allocation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the court’s position on reviewing broad social and economic policy questions?

    <p>Courts tend to defer more to the decision-maker in such circumstances.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the traditional 'Wednesbury' standard for unreasonableness?

    <p>A decision should be overturned if no reasonable authority could come to that decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How has the traditional Wednesbury standard of unreasonableness been modified?

    <p>The standard has been reduced to a lower, less difficult threshold in some situations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of intensity of review, what is meant by the phrase 'institutional competence'?

    <p>The idea that courts have expertise in matters of fundamental rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a consequence of a public body making an arbitrary decision?

    <p>It may result in inequality before the law and be held unreasonable by the courts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key difference between the application of intensity of reviews for human rights, compared to broader policy questions?

    <p>Courts will apply an approach of higher intensity of review to human rights cases and show more deference on broader policy questions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is context important in determining reasonableness of a decision?

    <p>Understanding the context establishes the degree of intervention the court should make.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the term 'super-Wednesbury' used to describe in the context of judicial review?

    <p>Areas of policy decision-making considered political and largely outside judicial review.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Nottinghamshire County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment, what factor led the court to avoid intervening in the Environment Secretary's guidance?

    <p>The guidance had received the 'seal of democratic approval' from Parliament.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes the court's stance in R v Cambridge District Health Authority, ex parte B?

    <p>Courts should avoid interefering when healthcare authorities allocate resources.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When is a court most likely to apply a 'more intense degree of scrutiny' to an administrative decision?

    <p>When the decision affects fundamental or human rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Bugdaycay v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what principle did Lord Bridge emphasize regarding administrative decisions impacting human rights?

    <p>The courts must apply a rigorous standard of scrutiny, especially when life is at risk.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith, why were the applicants' challenges ultimately unsuccessful?

    <p>The court found the MOD policy was supported by a significant body of opinion in Parliament.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What distinguishes R (Rogers) v Swindon NHS Primary Care Trust & Secretary of State for Health from R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith?

    <p>Rogers was heard after the HRA came into force, while Smith was not.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary significance of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) concerning judicial scrutiny of administrative decisions?

    <p>It introduced proportionality as the primary test in cases that involve human rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, what does the doctrine of proportionality mandate, in general terms?

    <p>The means used must be no more than is necessary to achieve the desired aim.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Lord Diplock suggest in GCHQ in relation to the grounds of judicial review?

    <p>That there may be future additions to the existing grounds of review.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the decision in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Javed based upon?

    <p>The abundance of evidence contradicting the Minister's designation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the significance of the phrase 'seal of democratic approval' in the context of judicial review?

    <p>It demonstrates that a decision has the explicit support of Parliament.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary legal test applied by courts when fundamental rights, protected under the ECHR, are engaged?

    <p>The principle of proportionality.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does a 'heightened standard of scrutiny', otherwise known as 'sub-Wednesbury', typically involve?

    <p>A more detailed and intense examination of the administrative decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In circumstances where a court applies 'sub-Wednesbury' analysis, what does the court focus on?

    <p>Whether the decision is one that raises substantial human or fundamental rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What legal principle was established in White and Collins v Minister of Health regarding the local authority's power to purchase land?

    <p>The local authority's power depends on the land not being classified as 'parkland'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What key issue did the court review in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja?

    <p>Whether the claimant was an 'illegal entrant'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Coleen Properties v Minister of Health and Local Government, why was the compulsory purchase order set aside?

    <p>There was no evidence supporting the necessity of the purchase for redevelopment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the 'no evidence rule' entail in judicial review?

    <p>A finding based on no evidence can lead to the court overturning that decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case established that a misunderstanding of an established fact could ground a claim for judicial review?

    <p>E v Secretary of State for the Home Department</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the four-part test established in E v SSHD require for reviewable mistakes of fact?

    <p>There must be an objective, established fact that was misunderstood.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings, what was the central issue found regarding the decision to ban stag hunting?

    <p>It was ultimately found to be unlawful.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the concept of 'relevant and irrelevant considerations' imply in a judicial review context?

    <p>Failure to account for relevant factors can lead to an unlawful decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the House of Lords in ex parte A decide the case based on breach of natural justice rather than on the mistake of fact?

    <p>The focus was on procedural errors, not factual inaccuracies.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What feature did the Court of Appeal emphasize about a factual mistake in Tameside?

    <p>It could be based on misunderstandings or ignorance.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the ruling concerning the Secretary of State's actions in Tameside regarding educational advice?

    <p>He misunderstood the nature of educational advice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is suggested by the phrase 'acting upon an incorrect basis of fact' as used by Lord Wilberforce?

    <p>Reliance on a factual inaccuracy can invalidate a decision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In judicial review, what element must be proven regarding the misunderstanding of an established fact?

    <p>That it caused unfairness in the decision-making process.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What characterizes prohibitory factors in decision-making?

    <p>They represent considerations that must not be regarded as relevant.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what circumstance will the courts deem a decision unlawful?

    <p>When relevant factors are not considered.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does the statutory language affect the court's role?

    <p>Broader phrased discretionary powers increase the court's involvement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the ruling in the case of Venables and Thompson?

    <p>The tariffs set were deemed unlawful because irrelevant factors were considered.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What aspect did the House of Lords examine in Roberts v Hopwood?

    <p>The interests of ratepayers in determining wage increases.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did the House of Lords rule in R v East Sussex County Council, ex parte Tandy?

    <p>The local authority failed to consider the child’s educational needs.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle is illustrated by the case of Padfield?

    <p>Ministers must use their powers only for the intended purpose.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which factor was found relevant in R v Gloucester County Council, ex parte Barry?

    <p>The local authority's own resource limitations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does unreasonableness in decision-making relate to?

    <p>The balance of competing relevant factors.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the Home Secretary's decision in Venables and Thompson fail?

    <p>He focused on irrelevant considerations like public opinion.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What defines a discretionary factor in law?

    <p>It can be considered if the decision-maker deems it appropriate.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the consequence of the local authority's decision in R v East Sussex County Council?

    <p>It was quashed for neglecting educational needs.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what situation can a decision-maker be found to be acting unlawfully?

    <p>When they use their discretion for an improper purpose.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What overarching principle applies to the construction of a statutory framework?

    <p>Courts must infer the intentions of statutes from their language.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the implied purpose of the power to revoke television licences in Congreve v Home Office?

    <p>To ensure that licences are not wrongfully used or obtained</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the dominant purpose alleged by the claimant regarding police powers?

    <p>To obtain access to materials believed to be held by him</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does it mean to 'fetter' discretion in the context of public bodies?

    <p>To limit the ability to exercise their powers effectively</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union, what did the House of Lords determine about the Home Secretary's discretion?

    <p>He could not bind himself not to exercise his discretion</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a key finding in the case of British Oxygen v Board of Trade?

    <p>The policy was valid, and individual applications were considered</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of ex parte Collymore, what was the issue with the student grants policy?

    <p>It was applied inflexibly despite its flexible wording</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did R v North-West Lancashire Health Authority, ex parte A, D and G reveal about health authority decisions?

    <p>Individual circumstances were disregarded in the policy application</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle was established regarding the delegation of discretion based on Lavender v Minister of Housing and Local Government?

    <p>Discretion may not be delegated to other individuals or bodies</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of public decision-making, what is an acceptable stance on adopting policies?

    <p>Policies are beneficial as long as individual cases are still considered</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the primary concern regarding the Secretary of State's decision in R (Luton BC and others) v Secretary of State for Education?

    <p>He failed to consider each claim on its own merits</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What standard must decisions meet according to concepts of judicial review concerning public authority actions?

    <p>They must respect statutory intentions and individual rights</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does the concept of fettering discretion relate to rigid public policies?

    <p>They can prevent necessary individual consideration in decision-making</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which instance is a public authority permitted to delegate its discretion?

    <p>When the law explicitly allows such delegation</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What underlying principle was emphasized in the court's decision regarding the case of Brent LBC?

    <p>Individual needs should dictate the outcome of applications</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Illegality

    • Fundamental Principle: Public bodies cannot act beyond their powers (ultra vires). Illegality review ensures executive power stays within legislative boundaries.
    • GCHQ Case: Decision-makers must correctly understand and apply governing law.
    • Categories of Illegality: Seven sub-categories extend beyond simple power existence.
      • (1) Simple Illegality (Ultra Vires): Broader than simply acting outside granted powers. A hypothetical example of a police officer arresting someone for parking violations without legal basis is considered ultra vires.
      • Attorney General v Fulham Corporation: Local authority's power to provide washhouses did not extend to running a laundry service where residents paid staff.
      • Westminster Corporation v London & North-West Railway: Building public lavatories could include a necessary subway.
      • Principle of Legality: Courts presume Parliament doesn't intend to infringe fundamental rights without explicit authorization. This emerged in the 1990s.
      • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech: Early adoption of the principle.
      • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms: Principle strongly associated with Lord Hoffman.
      • R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Witham: High court fees that restricted access were declared ultra vires.
      • (2) Errors of Law: Decision-makers wrongly applying or misinterpreting the law.
      • Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission: Removed distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional errors of law.
      • R v Lord President of the Privy Council, ex parte Page: All errors of law are potentially reviewable. Exceptions include non-decisive errors.
      • R v Monopolies Commission, ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd: Uncertainty in legal phrasing and its interpretation necessitates an assessment of irrationality.
      • (3) Errors of Fact: Challenges are now more widely accepted.
      • Precedent Facts: Decision-maker's power depends on a fact-finding. Error means lack of power.
      • White and Collins v Minister of Health: Local authority acted without power (land was parkland).
      • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja: Review of facts is critical to statutory power.
      • Ex Parte Khawaja: Key precedent for challenges to factual errors.
      • No Evidence for a Fact: Decisions lack supporting evidence (Coleen Properties).
      • Ignorance or Mistake of Established Fact: Judicial review is possible when decision-makers misunderstand established facts causing unfairness.
      • Secretary of State for Education v Tameside MBC: Secretary of State failed to consider relevant, professional educational advice.
      • (4) Relevant and Irrelevant Considerations: Courts review decision-makers' consideration of mandatory, prohibitory, and discretionary factors.
      • R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings: Ban on stag hunting illegal for ignoring the importance of public welfare.
      • Venables and Thompson: Home Secretary considered irrelevant public emotion and failed to consider the children's' welfare in setting tariffs.
      • Roberts v Hopwood: Local authority failed to consider ratepayers' interests when increasing wages.
      • (5) Improper Purpose: Using delegated power for a different objective.
      • Padfield v Minister of Agriculture: Minister refused a complaint review for personal reasons (illegality demonstrated).
      • Congreve v Home Office: Power to revoke TV licenses was not intended for revenue raising.
      • Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Police powers (terrorism act) did not meet the defined objective.
      • (6) Fettering of Discretion: Restricting ability to exercise discretion.
      • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union: Binding oneself not to carry out a statutory function.
      • British Oxygen v Board of Trade: Policy of £25 grant limit permissible (decision-making based on individual circumstances).
      • Ex parte Collymore: Policy blocked grants, lacked flexibility for individual appeals..
      • (7) Unlawful Delegation: Transferring decision-making power to another.
      • Lavender v Minister of Housing and Local Government: Minister of Housing and Local Government delegated its power to another to make planning decisions.
      • Carltona Principle: Ministers can delegate discretion to officials within their departments. exceptions to this rule exist.

    Unreasonableness

    • Wednesbury Unreasonableness: Courts can interfere if a decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could reach it.
    • Wednesbury Test: Used to evaluate whether a decision is unreasonable based on an illogical or morally unacceptable reasoning that goes beyond any potential difference of opinion. (Short v Poole Corporation).
    • Reformulation: "Irrationality" is a sub-category of unreasonableness (GCHQ, Lord Diplock).
    • Classes of Unreasonableness: Material defects in the process, oppressive decisions, violation of constitutional principles.
      • Material Defects: Wrongly weighing factors, lack of reasoning, failure to adequately inquire.
      • Wrongly Weighing: (West Glamorgan CC v Rafferty): Local authority prioritized delay over the travellers' needs.
      • Lack of Comprehensive Reasoning: (Re Duffy): Disregarding the independence of the Parades Commission.
      • Duty to Make Adequate Enquiry (Tameside Duty): Decision-makers must gather relevant information to justify decisions. (Secretary of State for Education v Tameside MBC).
      • Oppressive Decisions: Decisions resulting in excessive hardship.
      • Wheeler v Leicester City Council: Ban on rugby club using a local council's ground because club players might play in South Africa.
      • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Norney: Refusal to refer prisoners to the Parole Board deemed oppressive and unlawful.
      • Decisions Violating Constitutional Principles: Decisions incompatible with rule of law and consistency.
      • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte McCartney: Home Secretary's inconsistent sentencing policy.

    Intensity of Review

    • Higher Intensity: For decisions involving fundamental rights (higher scrutiny).
    • Lower Intensity: For broader policy decisions (less scrutiny).
    • Rationale: Balancing judicial deference with the protection of rights.

    Proportionality

    • Human Rights Act(HRA): Proportionality standard replacing Wednesbury unreasonableness for ECHR rights.
    • Proportionality Test: Necessary means to achieve a legitimate aim.
    • Independent Ground?: Debate about applying proportionality in domestic cases outside HRA cases.
    • Key Cases: Significant cases (GCHQ, Daly, Alconbury, Pham) have considered proportionality's place in domestic review, acknowledging the need for additional development in UK law.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Test your understanding of key concepts in Administrative Law, focusing on the principle of illegality and the doctrine of ultra vires. Explore significant cases and definitions that shape the application of these legal principles in judicial review. This quiz is essential for anyone studying administrative law or preparing for exams in related fields.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser