Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the fundamental principle of Administrative Law that illegality reflects?
What is the fundamental principle of Administrative Law that illegality reflects?
In the context of judicial review, what does 'illegality' mean, according to Lord Diplock?
In the context of judicial review, what does 'illegality' mean, according to Lord Diplock?
Which of the following scenarios would be considered acting 'ultra vires' in its traditional, narrow sense?
Which of the following scenarios would be considered acting 'ultra vires' in its traditional, narrow sense?
What would be considered a breach of the rules of illegality, using the definitions from the content?
What would be considered a breach of the rules of illegality, using the definitions from the content?
Signup and view all the answers
According to the content, what is NOT an example of acting ultra vires?
According to the content, what is NOT an example of acting ultra vires?
Signup and view all the answers
What did the Attorney General v Fulham Corporation case demonstrate about the powers of local authorities?
What did the Attorney General v Fulham Corporation case demonstrate about the powers of local authorities?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of the content, what does 'ultra vires' generally refer to?
In the context of the content, what does 'ultra vires' generally refer to?
Signup and view all the answers
Why is the doctrine of illegality important in Administrative Law?
Why is the doctrine of illegality important in Administrative Law?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of judicial review, what does the principle of legality primarily concern?
In the context of judicial review, what does the principle of legality primarily concern?
Signup and view all the answers
Which case is most associated with the development of the principle of legality in UK law?
Which case is most associated with the development of the principle of legality in UK law?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the core definition of an 'error of law' in judicial review?
What is the core definition of an 'error of law' in judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the significance of the Anisminic Ltd case in the context of judicial review of errors of law?
What was the significance of the Anisminic Ltd case in the context of judicial review of errors of law?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following is NOT a situation where courts might be unwilling to review an error of law?
Which of the following is NOT a situation where courts might be unwilling to review an error of law?
Signup and view all the answers
What did the House of Lords rule in R v Monopolies Commission, ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd regarding the interpretation of broad terms?
What did the House of Lords rule in R v Monopolies Commission, ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd regarding the interpretation of broad terms?
Signup and view all the answers
In R (Forge Care Homes Ltd) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, what was the core error made by the Health Board concerning funding?
In R (Forge Care Homes Ltd) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, what was the core error made by the Health Board concerning funding?
Signup and view all the answers
Historically, how did courts initially approach challenges based on errors of fact?
Historically, how did courts initially approach challenges based on errors of fact?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of these is now recognized as fact based for judicial review?
Which of these is now recognized as fact based for judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
What is meant by 'precedent facts' in the context of judicial review?
What is meant by 'precedent facts' in the context of judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a 'no evidence for a fact' error?
What is a 'no evidence for a fact' error?
Signup and view all the answers
How is a 'mistake of established fact' defined in the context of judicial review?
How is a 'mistake of established fact' defined in the context of judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following best describes the relationship between ultra vires and the principle of legality?
Which of the following best describes the relationship between ultra vires and the principle of legality?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the main difference between the early approach to errors of law and the approach following Anisminic Ltd?
What is the main difference between the early approach to errors of law and the approach following Anisminic Ltd?
Signup and view all the answers
Under what circumstance would a court NOT review the decisions of an inferior court for an error of law?
Under what circumstance would a court NOT review the decisions of an inferior court for an error of law?
Signup and view all the answers
What example did Warrington LJ provide in Short v Poole Corporation to illustrate unreasonable decision-making?
What example did Warrington LJ provide in Short v Poole Corporation to illustrate unreasonable decision-making?
Signup and view all the answers
According to Lord Diplock in the GCHQ case, what term did he prefer to 'unreasonableness'?
According to Lord Diplock in the GCHQ case, what term did he prefer to 'unreasonableness'?
Signup and view all the answers
What was Lord Donaldson's concern regarding Lord Diplock's definition of 'irrationality'?
What was Lord Donaldson's concern regarding Lord Diplock's definition of 'irrationality'?
Signup and view all the answers
What did Lord Cooke say about Lord Greene's formulation of unreasonableness?
What did Lord Cooke say about Lord Greene's formulation of unreasonableness?
Signup and view all the answers
According to De Smith & Jowell, which of the following is a class of unreasonableness identified by the courts?
According to De Smith & Jowell, which of the following is a class of unreasonableness identified by the courts?
Signup and view all the answers
What category does the failure to provide a comprehensive chain of reasoning fall under?
What category does the failure to provide a comprehensive chain of reasoning fall under?
Signup and view all the answers
In West Glamorgan CC v Rafferty, why was the local authority's decision to evict travellers found to be unreasonable?
In West Glamorgan CC v Rafferty, why was the local authority's decision to evict travellers found to be unreasonable?
Signup and view all the answers
Which issue was central to the decision in Re Duffy regarding the Parades Commission of Northern Ireland?
Which issue was central to the decision in Re Duffy regarding the Parades Commission of Northern Ireland?
Signup and view all the answers
Why was the Secretary of State's decision in R v Secretary of State for Environment, ex parte Fielder Estates (Canvey Ltd) considered unreasonable?
Why was the Secretary of State's decision in R v Secretary of State for Environment, ex parte Fielder Estates (Canvey Ltd) considered unreasonable?
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte Luff, why was the challenge on the grounds of irrationality unsuccessful?
In R v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte Luff, why was the challenge on the grounds of irrationality unsuccessful?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the concept of 'Tameside duty' refer to, as mentioned in the text?
What does the concept of 'Tameside duty' refer to, as mentioned in the text?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the outcome of R v North-West Lancashire Health Authority, ex parte A, D & G?
What was the outcome of R v North-West Lancashire Health Authority, ex parte A, D & G?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of judicial review, what does the term 'tautologous' mean, as used by Lord Cooke?
In the context of judicial review, what does the term 'tautologous' mean, as used by Lord Cooke?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following is NOT considered a material defect in the decision-making process, as discussed in the context of unreasonableness?
Which of the following is NOT considered a material defect in the decision-making process, as discussed in the context of unreasonableness?
Signup and view all the answers
What common thread runs through the cases that are considered examples of irrationality?
What common thread runs through the cases that are considered examples of irrationality?
Signup and view all the answers
Under what circumstances does Section 101 of the Local Government Act 1972 allow for the delegation of decision-making powers?
Under what circumstances does Section 101 of the Local Government Act 1972 allow for the delegation of decision-making powers?
Signup and view all the answers
According to the Carltona principle, what presumption do courts make regarding a government minister's ability to delegate discretion?
According to the Carltona principle, what presumption do courts make regarding a government minister's ability to delegate discretion?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of the Carltona principle, who remains politically accountable for delegated decisions?
In the context of the Carltona principle, who remains politically accountable for delegated decisions?
Signup and view all the answers
Which case extended the application of the Carltona principle beyond central government?
Which case extended the application of the Carltona principle beyond central government?
Signup and view all the answers
According to the case of DPP v Haw, what is an implied power for an office such as Chief Constable, if it is created by statue?
According to the case of DPP v Haw, what is an implied power for an office such as Chief Constable, if it is created by statue?
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Oladehinde, who was deemed able to make deportation decisions?
In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Oladehinde, who was deemed able to make deportation decisions?
Signup and view all the answers
What key factor was lacking in the case of R(Bourgass) v Secretary of State for Justice that led to the court's decision?
What key factor was lacking in the case of R(Bourgass) v Secretary of State for Justice that led to the court's decision?
Signup and view all the answers
Which case is most associated with the principle of 'Wednesbury unreasonableness'?
Which case is most associated with the principle of 'Wednesbury unreasonableness'?
Signup and view all the answers
In Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation, what condition did the local authority impose on the cinema?
In Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation, what condition did the local authority impose on the cinema?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the main purpose of the 'Wednesbury test'?
What is the main purpose of the 'Wednesbury test'?
Signup and view all the answers
According to Lord Greene MR in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation, when can a court interfere with a decision?
According to Lord Greene MR in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation, when can a court interfere with a decision?
Signup and view all the answers
What did Lord Wrenbury emphasize in Roberts v Hopwood regarding decision-making by public bodies?
What did Lord Wrenbury emphasize in Roberts v Hopwood regarding decision-making by public bodies?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the concept of 'unreasonableness' in judicial review involve?
What does the concept of 'unreasonableness' in judicial review involve?
Signup and view all the answers
In what context did the Carltona principle originate?
In what context did the Carltona principle originate?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a key distinction between the application of the Carltona principle and the principle applied in DPP v Haw?
What is a key distinction between the application of the Carltona principle and the principle applied in DPP v Haw?
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind, what was Lord Ackner's view on the application of proportionality by UK courts?
In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind, what was Lord Ackner's view on the application of proportionality by UK courts?
Signup and view all the answers
In R (Rogers) v Swindon NHS Primacy Care Trust, what was the core reason the health authority's policy was deemed irrational?
In R (Rogers) v Swindon NHS Primacy Care Trust, what was the core reason the health authority's policy was deemed irrational?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the key failing of the Treasury in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) that led to the court finding its action unlawful?
What was the key failing of the Treasury in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) that led to the court finding its action unlawful?
Signup and view all the answers
According to Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the fundamental problem with the Wednesbury test?
According to Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the fundamental problem with the Wednesbury test?
Signup and view all the answers
According to Lord Steyn in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, how does proportionality generally compare to Wednesbury unreasonableness?
According to Lord Steyn in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, how does proportionality generally compare to Wednesbury unreasonableness?
Signup and view all the answers
According to R (DSD and NBV) v The Parole Board, what was the main irrationality identified in the Parole Board's initial decision-making process?
According to R (DSD and NBV) v The Parole Board, what was the main irrationality identified in the Parole Board's initial decision-making process?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the 'Tameside duty' primarily require of decision-makers?
What does the 'Tameside duty' primarily require of decision-makers?
Signup and view all the answers
What was Lord Slynn's suggestion in R (Alconbury) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions regarding the relationship between Wednesbury unreasonableness and proportionality?
What was Lord Slynn's suggestion in R (Alconbury) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions regarding the relationship between Wednesbury unreasonableness and proportionality?
Signup and view all the answers
What was Dyson LJ's view in Association of British Civilian Internees - Far East Region v Secretary of State for Defence, in relation to the argument for replacing Wednesbury unreasonableness with proportionality?
What was Dyson LJ's view in Association of British Civilian Internees - Far East Region v Secretary of State for Defence, in relation to the argument for replacing Wednesbury unreasonableness with proportionality?
Signup and view all the answers
In R (Plantagenet Alliance) v Secretary of State for Justice, what did the court determine as the scope of the 'Tameside duty'?
In R (Plantagenet Alliance) v Secretary of State for Justice, what did the court determine as the scope of the 'Tameside duty'?
Signup and view all the answers
What principle is demonstrated in Wheeler v Leicester City Council concerning unreasonable decisions?
What principle is demonstrated in Wheeler v Leicester City Council concerning unreasonable decisions?
Signup and view all the answers
In Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the Supreme Court's view on proportionality as compared to Wednesbury unreasonableness?
In Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the Supreme Court's view on proportionality as compared to Wednesbury unreasonableness?
Signup and view all the answers
Which case demonstrates that a decision can be deemed Wednesbury unreasonable even if it is not illogical?
Which case demonstrates that a decision can be deemed Wednesbury unreasonable even if it is not illogical?
Signup and view all the answers
According to Lord Neuberger in Keyu v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what was the proper mechanism to replace Wednesbury unreasonableness with proportionality standard?
According to Lord Neuberger in Keyu v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what was the proper mechanism to replace Wednesbury unreasonableness with proportionality standard?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the case of R (Law Society of England and Wales) v Lord Chancellor highlight in relation to financial matters?
What does the case of R (Law Society of England and Wales) v Lord Chancellor highlight in relation to financial matters?
Signup and view all the answers
In Youssef v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what did Lord Carnwath suggest about the future of the proportionality standard of review?
In Youssef v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what did Lord Carnwath suggest about the future of the proportionality standard of review?
Signup and view all the answers
Which statement best reflects the ongoing debate regarding proportionality in UK administrative law?
Which statement best reflects the ongoing debate regarding proportionality in UK administrative law?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the main safeguard in the Counter-Terrorism Act 2007, that related to the direction issued in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2)?
What was the main safeguard in the Counter-Terrorism Act 2007, that related to the direction issued in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2)?
Signup and view all the answers
Given the various cases presented in this document, what is the main trend in judicial thought regarding proportionality as a standard of judicial review?
Given the various cases presented in this document, what is the main trend in judicial thought regarding proportionality as a standard of judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
What aspect of the Tameside duty was emphasized in R (Plantagenet Alliance)?
What aspect of the Tameside duty was emphasized in R (Plantagenet Alliance)?
Signup and view all the answers
In what way did Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) challenge the actions of the Treasury?
In what way did Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) challenge the actions of the Treasury?
Signup and view all the answers
Which case made the connection between rationality and illegality by discussing the need for an adequate enquiry by decision makers?
Which case made the connection between rationality and illegality by discussing the need for an adequate enquiry by decision makers?
Signup and view all the answers
What was particularly criticised about the decision in Wheeler v Leicester City Council?
What was particularly criticised about the decision in Wheeler v Leicester City Council?
Signup and view all the answers
What did Lord Sumption identify as a key issue in the court’s approach to the decision made by the Treasury in Bank Mellat?
What did Lord Sumption identify as a key issue in the court’s approach to the decision made by the Treasury in Bank Mellat?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following best describes the outcome of R (Plantagenet Alliance) in relation to the Secretary of State for Justice?
Which of the following best describes the outcome of R (Plantagenet Alliance) in relation to the Secretary of State for Justice?
Signup and view all the answers
In the R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Norney case, why was the Home Office's policy deemed unreasonable?
In the R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Norney case, why was the Home Office's policy deemed unreasonable?
Signup and view all the answers
What was a key reason for the court's decision to quash the local authority's decision in R v Barnsley MBC, ex parte Hook?
What was a key reason for the court's decision to quash the local authority's decision in R v Barnsley MBC, ex parte Hook?
Signup and view all the answers
What principle did the court uphold in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte McCartney?
What principle did the court uphold in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte McCartney?
Signup and view all the answers
In Percy v Hall, what was the main argument against the military byelaws that the court ultimately rejected?
In Percy v Hall, what was the main argument against the military byelaws that the court ultimately rejected?
Signup and view all the answers
What is meant by 'intensity of review' in the context of judicial review?
What is meant by 'intensity of review' in the context of judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
According to the content, what is the primary factor that influences the intensity of judicial review?
According to the content, what is the primary factor that influences the intensity of judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
Why are courts more likely to closely scrutinise decisions impacting fundamental rights?
Why are courts more likely to closely scrutinise decisions impacting fundamental rights?
Signup and view all the answers
According to the content, what type of decisions are subject to a lower intensity of review?
According to the content, what type of decisions are subject to a lower intensity of review?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the court’s position on reviewing broad social and economic policy questions?
What is the court’s position on reviewing broad social and economic policy questions?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the traditional 'Wednesbury' standard for unreasonableness?
What is the traditional 'Wednesbury' standard for unreasonableness?
Signup and view all the answers
How has the traditional Wednesbury standard of unreasonableness been modified?
How has the traditional Wednesbury standard of unreasonableness been modified?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of intensity of review, what is meant by the phrase 'institutional competence'?
In the context of intensity of review, what is meant by the phrase 'institutional competence'?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a consequence of a public body making an arbitrary decision?
What is a consequence of a public body making an arbitrary decision?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a key difference between the application of intensity of reviews for human rights, compared to broader policy questions?
What is a key difference between the application of intensity of reviews for human rights, compared to broader policy questions?
Signup and view all the answers
Why is context important in determining reasonableness of a decision?
Why is context important in determining reasonableness of a decision?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the term 'super-Wednesbury' used to describe in the context of judicial review?
What is the term 'super-Wednesbury' used to describe in the context of judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
In Nottinghamshire County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment, what factor led the court to avoid intervening in the Environment Secretary's guidance?
In Nottinghamshire County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment, what factor led the court to avoid intervening in the Environment Secretary's guidance?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following best describes the court's stance in R v Cambridge District Health Authority, ex parte B?
Which of the following best describes the court's stance in R v Cambridge District Health Authority, ex parte B?
Signup and view all the answers
When is a court most likely to apply a 'more intense degree of scrutiny' to an administrative decision?
When is a court most likely to apply a 'more intense degree of scrutiny' to an administrative decision?
Signup and view all the answers
In Bugdaycay v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what principle did Lord Bridge emphasize regarding administrative decisions impacting human rights?
In Bugdaycay v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what principle did Lord Bridge emphasize regarding administrative decisions impacting human rights?
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith, why were the applicants' challenges ultimately unsuccessful?
In R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith, why were the applicants' challenges ultimately unsuccessful?
Signup and view all the answers
What distinguishes R (Rogers) v Swindon NHS Primary Care Trust & Secretary of State for Health from R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith?
What distinguishes R (Rogers) v Swindon NHS Primary Care Trust & Secretary of State for Health from R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the primary significance of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) concerning judicial scrutiny of administrative decisions?
What is the primary significance of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) concerning judicial scrutiny of administrative decisions?
Signup and view all the answers
According to the content, what does the doctrine of proportionality mandate, in general terms?
According to the content, what does the doctrine of proportionality mandate, in general terms?
Signup and view all the answers
What did Lord Diplock suggest in GCHQ in relation to the grounds of judicial review?
What did Lord Diplock suggest in GCHQ in relation to the grounds of judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the decision in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Javed based upon?
What was the decision in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Javed based upon?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the significance of the phrase 'seal of democratic approval' in the context of judicial review?
What is the significance of the phrase 'seal of democratic approval' in the context of judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the primary legal test applied by courts when fundamental rights, protected under the ECHR, are engaged?
What is the primary legal test applied by courts when fundamental rights, protected under the ECHR, are engaged?
Signup and view all the answers
What does a 'heightened standard of scrutiny', otherwise known as 'sub-Wednesbury', typically involve?
What does a 'heightened standard of scrutiny', otherwise known as 'sub-Wednesbury', typically involve?
Signup and view all the answers
In circumstances where a court applies 'sub-Wednesbury' analysis, what does the court focus on?
In circumstances where a court applies 'sub-Wednesbury' analysis, what does the court focus on?
Signup and view all the answers
What legal principle was established in White and Collins v Minister of Health regarding the local authority's power to purchase land?
What legal principle was established in White and Collins v Minister of Health regarding the local authority's power to purchase land?
Signup and view all the answers
What key issue did the court review in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja?
What key issue did the court review in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja?
Signup and view all the answers
In Coleen Properties v Minister of Health and Local Government, why was the compulsory purchase order set aside?
In Coleen Properties v Minister of Health and Local Government, why was the compulsory purchase order set aside?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the 'no evidence rule' entail in judicial review?
What does the 'no evidence rule' entail in judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
Which case established that a misunderstanding of an established fact could ground a claim for judicial review?
Which case established that a misunderstanding of an established fact could ground a claim for judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the four-part test established in E v SSHD require for reviewable mistakes of fact?
What does the four-part test established in E v SSHD require for reviewable mistakes of fact?
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings, what was the central issue found regarding the decision to ban stag hunting?
In R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings, what was the central issue found regarding the decision to ban stag hunting?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the concept of 'relevant and irrelevant considerations' imply in a judicial review context?
What does the concept of 'relevant and irrelevant considerations' imply in a judicial review context?
Signup and view all the answers
Why did the House of Lords in ex parte A decide the case based on breach of natural justice rather than on the mistake of fact?
Why did the House of Lords in ex parte A decide the case based on breach of natural justice rather than on the mistake of fact?
Signup and view all the answers
What feature did the Court of Appeal emphasize about a factual mistake in Tameside?
What feature did the Court of Appeal emphasize about a factual mistake in Tameside?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the ruling concerning the Secretary of State's actions in Tameside regarding educational advice?
What was the ruling concerning the Secretary of State's actions in Tameside regarding educational advice?
Signup and view all the answers
What is suggested by the phrase 'acting upon an incorrect basis of fact' as used by Lord Wilberforce?
What is suggested by the phrase 'acting upon an incorrect basis of fact' as used by Lord Wilberforce?
Signup and view all the answers
In judicial review, what element must be proven regarding the misunderstanding of an established fact?
In judicial review, what element must be proven regarding the misunderstanding of an established fact?
Signup and view all the answers
What characterizes prohibitory factors in decision-making?
What characterizes prohibitory factors in decision-making?
Signup and view all the answers
In what circumstance will the courts deem a decision unlawful?
In what circumstance will the courts deem a decision unlawful?
Signup and view all the answers
How does the statutory language affect the court's role?
How does the statutory language affect the court's role?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the ruling in the case of Venables and Thompson?
What was the ruling in the case of Venables and Thompson?
Signup and view all the answers
What aspect did the House of Lords examine in Roberts v Hopwood?
What aspect did the House of Lords examine in Roberts v Hopwood?
Signup and view all the answers
How did the House of Lords rule in R v East Sussex County Council, ex parte Tandy?
How did the House of Lords rule in R v East Sussex County Council, ex parte Tandy?
Signup and view all the answers
What principle is illustrated by the case of Padfield?
What principle is illustrated by the case of Padfield?
Signup and view all the answers
Which factor was found relevant in R v Gloucester County Council, ex parte Barry?
Which factor was found relevant in R v Gloucester County Council, ex parte Barry?
Signup and view all the answers
What does unreasonableness in decision-making relate to?
What does unreasonableness in decision-making relate to?
Signup and view all the answers
Why did the Home Secretary's decision in Venables and Thompson fail?
Why did the Home Secretary's decision in Venables and Thompson fail?
Signup and view all the answers
What defines a discretionary factor in law?
What defines a discretionary factor in law?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the consequence of the local authority's decision in R v East Sussex County Council?
What was the consequence of the local authority's decision in R v East Sussex County Council?
Signup and view all the answers
In what situation can a decision-maker be found to be acting unlawfully?
In what situation can a decision-maker be found to be acting unlawfully?
Signup and view all the answers
What overarching principle applies to the construction of a statutory framework?
What overarching principle applies to the construction of a statutory framework?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the implied purpose of the power to revoke television licences in Congreve v Home Office?
What was the implied purpose of the power to revoke television licences in Congreve v Home Office?
Signup and view all the answers
In Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the dominant purpose alleged by the claimant regarding police powers?
In Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, what was the dominant purpose alleged by the claimant regarding police powers?
Signup and view all the answers
What does it mean to 'fetter' discretion in the context of public bodies?
What does it mean to 'fetter' discretion in the context of public bodies?
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union, what did the House of Lords determine about the Home Secretary's discretion?
In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union, what did the House of Lords determine about the Home Secretary's discretion?
Signup and view all the answers
What was a key finding in the case of British Oxygen v Board of Trade?
What was a key finding in the case of British Oxygen v Board of Trade?
Signup and view all the answers
In the case of ex parte Collymore, what was the issue with the student grants policy?
In the case of ex parte Collymore, what was the issue with the student grants policy?
Signup and view all the answers
What did R v North-West Lancashire Health Authority, ex parte A, D and G reveal about health authority decisions?
What did R v North-West Lancashire Health Authority, ex parte A, D and G reveal about health authority decisions?
Signup and view all the answers
What principle was established regarding the delegation of discretion based on Lavender v Minister of Housing and Local Government?
What principle was established regarding the delegation of discretion based on Lavender v Minister of Housing and Local Government?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of public decision-making, what is an acceptable stance on adopting policies?
In the context of public decision-making, what is an acceptable stance on adopting policies?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the primary concern regarding the Secretary of State's decision in R (Luton BC and others) v Secretary of State for Education?
What was the primary concern regarding the Secretary of State's decision in R (Luton BC and others) v Secretary of State for Education?
Signup and view all the answers
What standard must decisions meet according to concepts of judicial review concerning public authority actions?
What standard must decisions meet according to concepts of judicial review concerning public authority actions?
Signup and view all the answers
How does the concept of fettering discretion relate to rigid public policies?
How does the concept of fettering discretion relate to rigid public policies?
Signup and view all the answers
In which instance is a public authority permitted to delegate its discretion?
In which instance is a public authority permitted to delegate its discretion?
Signup and view all the answers
What underlying principle was emphasized in the court's decision regarding the case of Brent LBC?
What underlying principle was emphasized in the court's decision regarding the case of Brent LBC?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Illegality
- Fundamental Principle: Public bodies cannot act beyond their powers (ultra vires). Illegality review ensures executive power stays within legislative boundaries.
- GCHQ Case: Decision-makers must correctly understand and apply governing law.
-
Categories of Illegality: Seven sub-categories extend beyond simple power existence.
- (1) Simple Illegality (Ultra Vires): Broader than simply acting outside granted powers. A hypothetical example of a police officer arresting someone for parking violations without legal basis is considered ultra vires.
- Attorney General v Fulham Corporation: Local authority's power to provide washhouses did not extend to running a laundry service where residents paid staff.
- Westminster Corporation v London & North-West Railway: Building public lavatories could include a necessary subway.
- Principle of Legality: Courts presume Parliament doesn't intend to infringe fundamental rights without explicit authorization. This emerged in the 1990s.
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech: Early adoption of the principle.
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms: Principle strongly associated with Lord Hoffman.
- R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Witham: High court fees that restricted access were declared ultra vires.
- (2) Errors of Law: Decision-makers wrongly applying or misinterpreting the law.
- Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission: Removed distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional errors of law.
- R v Lord President of the Privy Council, ex parte Page: All errors of law are potentially reviewable. Exceptions include non-decisive errors.
- R v Monopolies Commission, ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd: Uncertainty in legal phrasing and its interpretation necessitates an assessment of irrationality.
- (3) Errors of Fact: Challenges are now more widely accepted.
- Precedent Facts: Decision-maker's power depends on a fact-finding. Error means lack of power.
- White and Collins v Minister of Health: Local authority acted without power (land was parkland).
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja: Review of facts is critical to statutory power.
- Ex Parte Khawaja: Key precedent for challenges to factual errors.
- No Evidence for a Fact: Decisions lack supporting evidence (Coleen Properties).
- Ignorance or Mistake of Established Fact: Judicial review is possible when decision-makers misunderstand established facts causing unfairness.
- Secretary of State for Education v Tameside MBC: Secretary of State failed to consider relevant, professional educational advice.
- (4) Relevant and Irrelevant Considerations: Courts review decision-makers' consideration of mandatory, prohibitory, and discretionary factors.
- R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings: Ban on stag hunting illegal for ignoring the importance of public welfare.
- Venables and Thompson: Home Secretary considered irrelevant public emotion and failed to consider the children's' welfare in setting tariffs.
- Roberts v Hopwood: Local authority failed to consider ratepayers' interests when increasing wages.
- (5) Improper Purpose: Using delegated power for a different objective.
- Padfield v Minister of Agriculture: Minister refused a complaint review for personal reasons (illegality demonstrated).
- Congreve v Home Office: Power to revoke TV licenses was not intended for revenue raising.
- Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Police powers (terrorism act) did not meet the defined objective.
- (6) Fettering of Discretion: Restricting ability to exercise discretion.
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union: Binding oneself not to carry out a statutory function.
- British Oxygen v Board of Trade: Policy of £25 grant limit permissible (decision-making based on individual circumstances).
- Ex parte Collymore: Policy blocked grants, lacked flexibility for individual appeals..
- (7) Unlawful Delegation: Transferring decision-making power to another.
- Lavender v Minister of Housing and Local Government: Minister of Housing and Local Government delegated its power to another to make planning decisions.
- Carltona Principle: Ministers can delegate discretion to officials within their departments. exceptions to this rule exist.
Unreasonableness
- Wednesbury Unreasonableness: Courts can interfere if a decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could reach it.
- Wednesbury Test: Used to evaluate whether a decision is unreasonable based on an illogical or morally unacceptable reasoning that goes beyond any potential difference of opinion. (Short v Poole Corporation).
- Reformulation: "Irrationality" is a sub-category of unreasonableness (GCHQ, Lord Diplock).
-
Classes of Unreasonableness: Material defects in the process, oppressive decisions, violation of constitutional principles.
- Material Defects: Wrongly weighing factors, lack of reasoning, failure to adequately inquire.
- Wrongly Weighing: (West Glamorgan CC v Rafferty): Local authority prioritized delay over the travellers' needs.
- Lack of Comprehensive Reasoning: (Re Duffy): Disregarding the independence of the Parades Commission.
- Duty to Make Adequate Enquiry (Tameside Duty): Decision-makers must gather relevant information to justify decisions. (Secretary of State for Education v Tameside MBC).
- Oppressive Decisions: Decisions resulting in excessive hardship.
- Wheeler v Leicester City Council: Ban on rugby club using a local council's ground because club players might play in South Africa.
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Norney: Refusal to refer prisoners to the Parole Board deemed oppressive and unlawful.
- Decisions Violating Constitutional Principles: Decisions incompatible with rule of law and consistency.
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte McCartney: Home Secretary's inconsistent sentencing policy.
Intensity of Review
- Higher Intensity: For decisions involving fundamental rights (higher scrutiny).
- Lower Intensity: For broader policy decisions (less scrutiny).
- Rationale: Balancing judicial deference with the protection of rights.
Proportionality
- Human Rights Act(HRA): Proportionality standard replacing Wednesbury unreasonableness for ECHR rights.
- Proportionality Test: Necessary means to achieve a legitimate aim.
- Independent Ground?: Debate about applying proportionality in domestic cases outside HRA cases.
- Key Cases: Significant cases (GCHQ, Daly, Alconbury, Pham) have considered proportionality's place in domestic review, acknowledging the need for additional development in UK law.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Test your understanding of key concepts in Administrative Law, focusing on the principle of illegality and the doctrine of ultra vires. Explore significant cases and definitions that shape the application of these legal principles in judicial review. This quiz is essential for anyone studying administrative law or preparing for exams in related fields.