Actus Reus and Causation Elements

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

In legal causation, which case is typically referenced?

  • R v White
  • R v Pagett
  • R v Blaue
  • R v Kimsey (correct)

According to the 'thin skull rule,' a defendant must take the victim as they find them, except for pre-existing physical weaknesses.

False (B)

Name the case that exemplifies the application of the 'thin skull rule'.

R v Blaue

When medical treatment is considered an intervening act, it can break the chain of causation unless the original injury is still a/an ______ cause.

<p>operating</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match each case with the corresponding principle they illustrate regarding intervening acts:

<p>R v Jordan = Medical treatment drastically departing from proper procedure R v Smith = Original wound still an operating and substantial cause R v Roberts = Victim's own act in response to the defendant's act R v Williams = Victim's unreasonable or daft act</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what scenario is a defendant typically NOT held liable due to intervening acts?

<p>When the victim's actions are unreasonable or 'daft'. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In 'drug cases,' like R v Kennedy, the supplier of drugs is always responsible for the death of the user, regardless of the user's voluntary act.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cases, such as R v Malcherek and Steel, under what circumstances may switching off life support not break the chain of causation?

<p>The original injury is the operative cause of death</p> Signup and view all the answers

In R v Wallace, the defendant was not held liable because the victim's ______ broke the chain of causation.

<p>euthanasia</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match each type of 'Actus Reus' with its corresponding case example:

<p>Conduct Crime = Hill v Baxter State of Affairs = R v Larsonneur Contractual Omission = R v Pitwood Relationship Omission = R v Gibbins and Proctor</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which case is most closely associated with the actus reus of 'state of affairs'?

<p>R v Larsonneur (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cases of omission, a 'contractual duty' to act is sufficient to establish actus reus even without any direct relationship with the victim.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which case law involves 'relationship' omission to establish actus reus.

<p>R v Gibbins and Proctor</p> Signup and view all the answers

R v Stone and Dobinson is a case of omission pertaining to the ______ undertaken voluntarily.

<p>undertaking</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following Cases with the type of Omission that establishes Actus Reus.

<p>R v Dytham = Position R v Miller = Danger created</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which common law case establishes Actus Reus based on a 'position' of duty?

<p>R v Dytham (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In R v Miller, the omission to act does not create original danger, it only aggravates an existing situation.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of Actus Reus, which scenario involves an example of establishing Actus Reus when a 'danger' has been created.

<p>R v Miller/R v Evans</p> Signup and view all the answers

A 'conduct crime,' as exemplified by Hill v Baxter, criminalizes the ______, irrespective of its outcome.

<p>conduct</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match each scenario with the relevant case concerning Actus Reus.

<p>Factual Causation = R v Pagett Self-Neglect = R v Wallace</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Legal Causation

Deals with establishing the act was a significant cause of the result.

Thin Skull Rule

This principle dictates you must take your victim as you find them.

intervening acts

Actions by the victim or third parties that break the chain of causation.

Conduct crime

A type of actus reus where liability arises from conduct.

Signup and view all the flashcards

State of Affairs

A type of actus reus where liability arises from state of affairs

Signup and view all the flashcards

Omission

When a duty is breached through omission

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contractual Duty

A contractual duty to act.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Relationship Duty

A duty to act based on familial relationships.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Undertaken Voluntary Duty

A voluntarily undertaken duty of care.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Position Duty

A duty to act arising from one's official role or position.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Danger Created Duty

A duty to act when one creates a dangerous situation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Actus Reus

  • Conduct crime: Hill v Baxter
  • State of Affairs: R v Larsonneur
  • Consequence
  • Omission
    • Contractual: R v Pitwood
    • Relationship: R v Gibbins + Proctor
    • Undertaken voluntarily: R v Stone + Dobinson
    • Position: R v Dytham
    • Danger created: R v Miller / R v Evans
    • Statutory

Causation

  • Factual: R v Pagett / R v White
  • Legal: R v Kimsey
  • Thin Skull Rule: R v Blaue

Intervening Acts

  • Medical treatment: R v Jordan / R v Smith
  • Natural but unpredictable
  • Victim's own act: R v Roberts / R v Williams
  • Drug cases: R v Kennedy
  • Life-support: R v Malcherek + Steel
  • Victim's self-neglect: R v Wallace

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Causation in the Criminal Law midterm 1
27 questions
Actus Reus Part 2: Results and Causation
64 questions
General Elements of Criminal Law Quiz
5 questions
Criminal Law: Actus Reus, Mens Rea & Causation
10 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser