Academic Misconduct Procedures

Podcast Beta

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the first action the adjudicator may take after completing an investigation?

Initiate an automatic appeal process

Impose a sanction immediately

Inform the student of the decision

Dismiss the matter and offer a teachable moment (correct)

Which factor is NOT considered by the adjudicator when imposing a sanction?

The intent behind the misconduct

The context in which the misconduct occurred

The student's educational and cultural background

The length of the student's academic record (correct)

How long does a student have to initiate an appeal after a decision by the adjudicator?

5 working days

20 working days

15 working days

10 working days (correct)

What does an appeal to the Discipline Appeal Committee do to the adjudicator's decision?

It operates as a stay on the decision Signup and view all the answers

Who comprises the Discipline Appeal Committee?

Two faculty members and a student Signup and view all the answers

Under what condition can the Chair of the Discipline Appeal Committee grant a review of a prior decision?

If there is compelling evidence of miscarriage of justice Signup and view all the answers

How is the student informed of the adjudicator's decision?

In writing, detailing the right of appeal and process followed Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary basis for the Discipline Appeal Committee to reconsider a decision?

New evidence regarding the case Signup and view all the answers

Which factor is NOT considered when determining the penalty for academic misconduct?

Student's favorite subject Signup and view all the answers

What is the first step an instructor should take upon suspecting academic misconduct?

Meet informally with the student to discuss the matter Signup and view all the answers

If a student does not respond to an invitation to meet regarding a misconduct allegation, what should the instructor do next?

Forward the matter to the Head or adjudicator with evidence Signup and view all the answers

In a departmentalized faculty, what happens after the Head reviews the documentation of a misconduct allegation?

They schedule a meeting with the student Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is an example of an aggravating factor in academic misconduct cases?

The severity of the offence's impact on others Signup and view all the answers

What is one possible outcome during the preliminary review of the academic misconduct case?

A teachable moment offered by the instructor Signup and view all the answers

What is one criterion that would be considered a mitigating factor in evaluating academic misconduct?

Personal issues affecting the student Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following elements is most likely to have a significant impact on the determination of penalties for academic misconduct?

The relative weight of the assignment in the course Signup and view all the answers

What type of vote is required for the Discipline Appeal Committee to uphold a suspension or expulsion decision?

Unanimous vote Signup and view all the answers

What is the maximum time frame within which hearings of the Discipline Appeal Committee should commence after receiving an appeal?

Sixty calendar days Signup and view all the answers

What rights do parties have regarding their advisors during a hearing?

They can have an advisor or legal counsel present. Signup and view all the answers

How much notice must parties receive before a hearing of the Discipline Appeal Committee?

At least ten calendar days Signup and view all the answers

What does the Discipline Appeal Committee consider when determining the sanction to be imposed?

Whether the act constitutes a first or subsequent offence Signup and view all the answers

What is the expectation regarding the exchange of evidence before the hearing?

Exchange must occur a minimum of seven calendar days prior to the hearing Signup and view all the answers

What power does the Discipline Appeal Committee have in relation to deadlines?

They can waive or extend deadlines when justice warrants Signup and view all the answers

What voting rights does the Chair of the Discipline Appeal Committee have?

The Chair has the same voting rights as all other members Signup and view all the answers

What is defined as a learning opportunity where an instructor engages with a student informally?

Teachable Moment Signup and view all the answers

Which individuals are included in the definition of 'Student' at the University of Windsor?

Applicants and current or former students Signup and view all the answers

In assessing potential misconduct, what should be considered when determining a teachable moment?

The student's intent and understanding of expectations Signup and view all the answers

What should be the focus when adjudicators are reviewing formal complaints?

Educational and cultural backgrounds of the student Signup and view all the answers

What is the main purpose of incorporating teachable moments in the adjudication process?

To enhance student learning and mitigate repeat offences Signup and view all the answers

What should be determined when there is potential misconduct that appears due to a lack of understanding?

An educational response may be appropriate Signup and view all the answers

Which entity is NOT considered a party in the adjudication process?

The student’s parents Signup and view all the answers

When should the merits of misconduct cases be carefully assessed?

At every stage of the process Signup and view all the answers

What principles guide the Discipline Appeal Committee during hearings?

Principles of fairness and justice Signup and view all the answers

What happens if a party fails to attend the hearing and does not provide a satisfactory explanation?

The hearing proceeds in their absence. Signup and view all the answers

Who bears the burden of proof in the proceedings before the Discipline Appeal Committee?

The adjudicator Signup and view all the answers

Under what condition may procedural requirements be waived in the Discipline Appeal process?

With both parties' written consent Signup and view all the answers

What is the standard for the Discipline Appeal Committee's findings regarding misconduct?

It must be more likely than not that misconduct occurred Signup and view all the answers

What action may be taken if there are concurrent proceedings involving similar matters?

Combine or run the proceedings concurrently or consecutively Signup and view all the answers

What happens to audio recordings of hearings once the sanction expires?

They must be destroyed after a specific period Signup and view all the answers

What is the consequence if a student fails to respond to the complaint allegations?

No penalties can be imposed solely based on that failure Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Teachable Moment

A learning opportunity for a student.
Instructor informally teaches a lesson or discusses the issue with the student.
Used in lieu of formal complaint.
More effective than formal complaints for education and mitigating repeat offenses.
Adjudicators and the Discipline Appeal Committee should consider teachable moments during review and adjudication.

Allegations of Misconduct

Assessed at every stage of the process.
Determine whether an educational response (teachable moment) is appropriate.
Determine need for further investigation or disciplinary measures.
Consider:
- Relative weight of the assignment.
- Level of the student’s academic experience.
- Student’s acceptance of responsibility.
- Extenuating circumstances.
- Aggravating or mitigating factors.
- Impact of the offense on others.

Procedures in Cases of Academic Misconduct

Step 1: Preliminary Review by instructor or supervisor.
- Informal meeting within 10 working days of discovering misconduct.
- Dismiss the matter or offer a teachable moment.
- Forward to the Head (departmentalized faculties) or adjudicator (non-departmentalized faculties).
Step 2: Review by the Head (departmentalized faculties).
- Review documentation and dismiss the matter or hold a meeting within 10 working days.
Step 3: Adjudication.
- Adjudicator decides whether to dismiss the matter or impose sanctions.
- Takes into consideration the factors mentioned in Allegations of Misconduct.
Step 4: Appeal.
- Automatic right of appeal to the Discipline Appeal Committee within 10 working days.
- Appeal acts as a stay on the adjudicator's decision.

Discipline Appeal Committee

Final and binding jurisdiction.
Reconsideration based on evidence of a miscarriage of justice or new evidence.
Composed of two faculty members and a student.
Decisions made by majority vote, but unanimous required to uphold the suspension, expulsion, or exclusion of a student.
May consider alternate sanctions.
Takes into consideration whether the act of misconduct was a first or subsequent offense.
Hearings commence within 60 calendar days of appeal filing.
Parties have the right to an advisor or legal counsel, present evidence, and receive full disclosure of evidence.
Not bound by laws of evidence for judicial proceedings.
Burden of proof lies with the adjudicator.
Decision based on evidence and arguments presented.
Disciplinary penalties are not imposed solely on a student's failure to answer allegations, appear at hearings, or testify.
Procedural requirements can be waived with written consent from both parties and the Chair.
All hearings are audio-recorded and recordings are kept in confidence.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

This quiz covers the procedures and considerations in handling allegations of academic misconduct. It highlights the concept of teachable moments as an educational response and outlines the steps involved in reviewing and adjudicating such cases. Understanding these processes is essential for fostering a fair academic environment.