The actus reus elements of a criminal offense (week 2)

ReformedChocolate avatar
ReformedChocolate
·
·
Download

Start Quiz

Study Flashcards

Questions and Answers

What is actus reus?

a particular event or state of affairs that was “caused” by the accused person’s conduct

What are the two elements of a criminal offence?

Actus reus and Mens rea

To claim the person committed the offence only one of the two actus reus or mens rea must be proved

True

What is actus reus?

<p>a particular event or state of affairs that was “caused” by the accused person’s conduct</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is mens rea?

<p>Mens rea: the conduct was accompanied by a certain state of mind (mental elements of an offense)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is it important to focus on the actus reus elements of a criminal offense? (Physical elements (evidence), Tire marks, weapon, etc)

<p>Proves that the crime actually occurred, to connect the accused to the physical act that killed the person</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must the Crown prove for you to be held criminally responsible?

<p>Crown must prove beyond reasonable doubt all the necessary actus reus elements</p> Signup and view all the answers

The existence of mens rea (by itself) does not lead to conviction

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

actus and mens must

Signup and view all the answers

Voluntariness element in actus reus means that

Signup and view all the answers

There are three possible elements of the actus reus of a criminal offense, what are they?

<p>conduct, circumstances, consequences</p> Signup and view all the answers

match the following

<p>conduct = “ a voluntary act or omission or state of being; constituting the central feature of the crime” (intoxicated behind the wheel → state of being) circumstances = “the surroundings and “material” (relevant to the definition of the crime) (definitions of the law that make the act a crime) (act in itself lacks what's required in law that makes it an offense or illegal) (circumstances of the conduct) consequence = of the voluntary conduct (specified in the definition of the crime) (Nette test) with great power = comes great responsibility</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match to the correct one

<p>Defining “assault”: s. 265 (I)(a) of the code = A person commits an assault when (a) without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly… Find the provision in the code that refers to the offense of assault causing bodily harm: S. 267 of the Code = (I) everyone who, in committing an assault, (a) carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon or (b) causes bodily harm to the complainant, is guilty of an indictable offense… Define “bodily harm” in s. 2 in the Code = means any hurt or injury to a person that interfere w the health or comfort of the person and that is more than transient or trifling in nature a = b</p> Signup and view all the answers

When did R. v. Moquin occur? (year)

<p>2012</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was Moquin charged with?

<p>Charged w assault causing bodily harm</p> <p>Moquin moved in w victim and 15-16 year old daughter after 10 days, he assaulted her (pushed her, slapped her, grabbed hand so hard she bruised → she could not use her hand for a few days), got into many arguments, he tells his lawyer that he should be charged w just assault not assault causing bodily harm, conduct is the applied pressure to her hand, circumstances: w/o consent, consequences: visible bruising,</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the crown need to prove?

<p>Essential feature of the act applied pressure onto the victim w/o consent and no doubt that the pressure applied caused the bruising and that the act w/o a doubt… (&quot;killed/harmed the victim&quot;?)</p> Signup and view all the answers

For sexual assault: courts rely on Section ____ (I) (2) and 271

Signup and view all the answers

How to prove the assault is a sexual one instead of a common assault?

<p>How to prove the assault is a sexual one instead of a common assault?</p> Signup and view all the answers

The case of Chase (1987) R.v. Chase (Chase name of the accused) what was he charged with?

<p>He was charged w sexual assault and claimed it to be just assault (grabbing her, licking her, “don’t try to resist”, grabbing her from behind circumstances: lack of consent</p> Signup and view all the answers

for the accused to be convicted of sexual assault, there must be contact with the genitals

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the elements of actus reus?

<p>all of the above</p> Signup and view all the answers

Three elements of actus reus of the offence of sexual assault. Match to the correct answer

<p>Conduct = the intentional application of force or the threat of application of force (touching, intercourse, fondling…) (!) Circumstances = the force took place w/o the consent of the victim and the assault is of a “sexual nature”, surroundings and material (gestures, language and act itself) what makes it an illegal act Consequences = the accused applied force, or s/he caused the victim to believe that the accused has “the present ability” to apply such force (!) a = b</p> Signup and view all the answers

B.C. Court of Appeal: the actus reus requirement of sexual assault ________

Signup and view all the answers

The proof of touching (conduct: voluntary) The sexual nature of the contact and, The absence of consent are examples of?

<p>the actus reus requirement of sexual assault</p> Signup and view all the answers

The proof of touching (conduct: voluntary) The sexual nature of the contact are objective

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The absence of consent is not subjective

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

More Quizzes Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser