Core Principles Of Mental Health Research PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by WorldFamousZombie1045
UCL
Tags
Summary
This document outlines core principles of mental health research, focusing on learning objectives, selecting measures, and different types of assessments used in mental health research both in research settings and clinical practice. It also touches on outcomes that are valued by service users.
Full Transcript
**[Core Principles Of Mental Health Research]** **[What Do We Measure In Mental Health?]** **[Prep Talk]** [Learning Objectives: ] - Introduce main domains of measurement in mental health research - Familiarise students with pros and cons of these measures [Selecting a measure for mental h...
**[Core Principles Of Mental Health Research]** **[What Do We Measure In Mental Health?]** **[Prep Talk]** [Learning Objectives: ] - Introduce main domains of measurement in mental health research - Familiarise students with pros and cons of these measures [Selecting a measure for mental health research:] 1. Formulate a very clear research question 2. Identify as precisely as possible the concepts involved in this question 3. Find the best measures you can of these concepts OR design your own [Outline:] Contexts in which scales are used: - Research studies: we use measures to: - Describe participants, including diagnosis - Measure outcomes of interventions - Measure potential aetiological variables, or other variable that may influence outcomes - In clinical practice: Measures used to: - Chart individual progress and assess individual needs - Audit or evaluate services - Assess needs within a service [Some Major Types of Measure: ] - Diagnosis - Symptoms - Psychological characteristics & cognitive functioning - Social functioning & disability - Quality of life & needs - Measures that matter to service users e.g., recovery and well-being [What is the purpose of making a research diagnosis?] - Epidemiology: cannot compare rates without all meeting similar criteria - Treatment Studies: need to understand who is being treated to understand outcomes - Alternatives: dimensional measurements [Types of Measures used in diagnosis:] Semi-Structured Interviews: - Allows exploration of symptoms in depth - Allows participants to tell their story rather than ticking boxes - Gold standard assessment - But relatively expensive and elaborate Structured Interviews: - Reasonable correlation with full diagnostic assessment - Don't require clinician/extensive training - Harder to adapt to participants e.g., with cognitive difficulties [Diagnostic Assessments: ] - Shorter scales or rating scales focused on a specific disorder: - Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI) - Conners' Adult ADHD Diagnostic Interview for DSM (CAADID) - Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) - Global scales leading to a full range of diagnoses: - Clinical interview schedule (CIS) - Scales for Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) - Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID) - Mini international Neuropsychiatric interview (MINI) [Symptom Measures:] 1. Overall screening measures of psychological "caseness" (e.g., the GHQ) 2. Measures covering a range of symptoms of psychiatric disorder (e.g., the BPRS) 3. Measures developed specifically for a particular disorder (e.g., BDI) [Psychological Measures: ] - Many measures of psychological characteristics find application in mental health research e.g., - Personality traits relevant to mental health problems - Coping strategies & cognitive style - Cognitive functioning - Relationships and attachment: Adult Attachment interview, Camberwell family interview for expressed emotion [Social Functioning & Disability:] - Social functioning -- carrying out daily living activities and social roles -- from personal care to work - Disability -- limitations on activities that result from a physical impairment - Scales often informant-rates (clinicians, relatives) e.g., Social Functioning Questionnaire, Life Skills Profile - Interaction between illness/impairment and society: how much illness restricts social functioning depends both on social role expectations and on how much society helps you overcome the impairment [Social Functioning & Disability: ] Scales include: - GAF - WHODAS - SFQ [Quality of life:] - Two types of measures 1. Objective measures used in health economic analyses e.g., calculating how much a year's good quality life costs 2. Subjective measures where people asked to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of life - Correlation between objective and subjective quality of life is often low [Outcomes that service users value:] - When asked what's most important, service users are quite uninterested in symptoms - PROMS -- Patient-Rated Outcome Measures - Measures of self-rated recovery and hope reflect recovery movement in mental health (focus on a personal journey in which achieve own goals) - Measures of well-being are valued for capturing positive aspects of how people feel - Usefulness in measuring recovery from mental health problems not fully clear - Service users also often place high value on social relations. Focus of measures includes social network size, objective and subjective social support, loneliness, social capital