History of Microorganisms

Summary

This document provides a historical overview of microorganisms. It explores the sheer abundance and varied roles of microorganisms, their contribution to ecological systems, the early understanding of microorganisms, and the conflicts surrounding spontaneous generation.

Full Transcript

History The importance of microorganisms can’t be overemphasized. In terms of sheer number and mass—it is estimated that microbes contain 50% of the biological carbon and 90% of the biological nitrogen on Earth—they greatly exceed every other group of organisms on the planet. Furthermore, they are f...

History The importance of microorganisms can’t be overemphasized. In terms of sheer number and mass—it is estimated that microbes contain 50% of the biological carbon and 90% of the biological nitrogen on Earth—they greatly exceed every other group of organisms on the planet. Furthermore, they are found everywhere: from geothermal vents in the ocean depths to the coldest arctic ice, to every person’s skin. They are major contributors to the functioning of the biosphere, being indispensable for the cycling of the elements essential for life. They also are a source of nutrients at the base of all ecological food chains and webs. Most importantly, certain microorganisms carry out photosynthesis, rivaling plants in their role of capturing carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen into the atmosphere. The Discovery of microorganisms Even before microorganisms were seen, some investigators suspected their existence and responsibility for disease. Among others, the Roman philosopher Lucretius (about 98–55 B.C.) and the physician Girolamo Fracastoro (1478–1553) suggested that disease was caused by invisible living creatures. The earliest microscopic observations appear to have been made between 1625 and 1630 on bees and weevils by the Italian Francesco Stelluti. Antony van Leeuwenhoek (1632–1723) could magnify around 50 to 300 times, and he may have illuminated his liquid specimens by placing them between two pieces of glass and shining light on them at a 45° angle to the specimen plane. This would have provided a form of dark- field illumination in which the organisms appeared as bright objects against a dark background and made bacteria clearly visible. Beginning in 1673, Leeuwenhoek sent detailed letters describing his discoveries to the Royal Society of London. It is clear from his descriptions that he saw both bacteria and protozoa. The conflict over spontaneous generation From earliest times, people had believed in spontaneous generation that living organisms could develop from nonliving matter. Even Aristotle (384–322 B.C.) thought some of the simpler invertebrates could arise by spontaneous generation. This view finally was challenged by the Italian physician Francesco Redi (1626–1697), who carried out a series of experiments on decaying meat and its ability to produce maggots spontaneously. Redi placed meat in three containers. One was uncovered, a second was covered with paper, and the third was covered with a fine gauze that would exclude flies. Flies laid their eggs on the uncovered meat and maggots developed. The other two pieces of meat did not produce maggots spontaneously. However, flies were attracted to the gauze-covered container and laid their eggs on the gauze; these eggs produced maggots. Thus the generation of maggots by decaying meat resulted from the presence of fly eggs, and meat did not spontaneously generate maggots as previously believed. Similar experiments by others helped discredit the theory for larger organisms. Leeuwenhoek’s discovery of microorganisms renewed the controversy. Some proposed that microorganisms arose by spontaneous generation even though larger organisms did not. They pointed out that boiled extracts of hay or meat would give rise to microorganisms after sitting for a while. In 1748, the English priest John Needham (1713–1781) reported the results of his experiments on spontaneous generation. Needham boiled mutton broth and then tightly stoppered the flasks. Eventually many of the flasks became cloudy and contained microorganisms. He thought organic matter contained a vital force that could confer the properties of life on nonliving matter. A few years later, the Italian priest and naturalist Lazzaro Spallanzani (1729–1799) improved on Needham’s experimental design by first sealing glass flasks that contained water and seeds. If the sealed flasks were placed in boiling water for 3/4 of an hour, no growth took place as long as the flasks remained sealed. He proposed that air carried germs to the culture medium, but also commented that the external air might be required for growth of animals already in the medium. Several investigators attempted to counter such arguments. Theodore Schwann (1810–1882) allowed air to enter a flask containing a sterile nutrient solution after the air had passed through a red-hot tube. The flask remained sterile. Subsequently Georg Friedrich Schroder and Theodor von Dusch allowed air to enter a flask of heat-sterilized medium after it had passed through sterile cotton wool. No growth occurred in the medium even though the air had not been heated. Despite these experiments the French naturalist Felix Pouchet claimed in 1859 to have carried out experiments conclusively proving that microbial growth could occur without air contamination. This claim provoked Louis Pasteur (1822–1895) to settle the matter once and for all. Pasteur first filtered air through cotton and found that objects resembling plant spores had been trapped. If a piece of the cotton was placed in sterile medium after air had been filtered through it, microbial growth occurred. Next he placed nutrient solutions in flasks, heated their necks in a flame, and drew them out into a variety of curves, while keeping the ends of the necks open to the atmosphere. Pasteur then boiled the solutions for a few minutes and allowed them to cool. No growth took place even though the contents of the flasks were exposed to the air. Pasteur pointed out that no growth occurred because dust and germs had been trapped on the walls of the curved necks. If the necks were broken, growth commenced immediately. Pasteur had not only resolved the controversy by 1861 but also had shown how to keep solutions sterile. The English physicist John Tyndall (1820–1893) dealt a final blow to spontaneous generation in 1877 by demonstrating that dust did indeed carry germs and that if dust was absent, broth remained sterile even if directly exposed to air. During the course of his studies, Tyndall provided evidence for the existence of exceptionally heat-resistant forms of bacteria. Golden age of microbiology Pasteur’s work with swan neck flasks ushered in the Golden Age of Microbiology. Within 60 years (1857–1914), a number of disease- causing microbes were discovered, great strides in understanding microbial metabolism were made, and techniques for isolating and characterizing microbes were improved. Agostino Bassi (1773–1856) first showed a microorganism could cause disease when he demonstrated in 1835 that a silkworm disease was due to a fungal infection. He also suggested that many diseases were due to microbial infections. In 1845, M. J. Berkeley proved that the great Potato Blight of Ireland was caused by a water mold, and in 1853, Heinrich de Bary showed that smut and rust fungi caused cereal crop diseases. Following his successes with the study of fermentation, Pasteur was asked by the French government to investigate the pèbrine disease of silkworms that was disrupting the silk industry. After several years of work, he showed that the disease was due to a protozoan parasite. Indirect evidence for the germ theory of disease came from the work of the English surgeon Joseph Lister (1827–1912) on the prevention of wound infections. Lister, developed a system of antiseptic surgery designed to prevent microorganisms from entering wounds. Instruments were heat sterilized, and phenol was used on surgical dressings and at times sprayed over the surgical area. The approach was remarkably successful and transformed surgery after Lister published his findings in 1867. It also provided strong indirect evidence for the role of microorganisms in disease because phenol, which kills bacteria, also prevented wound infections. Koch’s Postulates The first direct demonstration of the role of bacteria in causing disease came from the study of anthrax by the German physician Robert Koch (1843–1910). Koch used the criteria proposed by his former teacher, Jacob Henle (1809–1885), to establish the relationship between Bacillus anthracis and anthrax, and published his findings in 1876. 1. The microorganism must be present in every case of the disease but absent from healthy organisms. 2. The suspected microorganisms must be isolated and grown in a pure culture. 3. The same disease must result when the isolated microorganism is inoculated into a healthy host. 4. The same microorganism must be isolated again from the diseased host. The development of techniques for studying microbial pathogens During Koch’s studies on bacterial diseases, it became necessary to isolate suspected bacterial pathogens in pure culture—a culture containing only one type of microorganism. At first Koch cultured bacteria on the sterile surfaces of cut, boiled potatoes, but this was unsatisfactory because the bacteria would not always grow well. Eventually he developed culture media using meat extracts and protein digests because of their similarity to body fluids. He first tried to solidify the media by adding gelatin. Separate bacterial colonies developed after the surface of the solidified medium had been streaked with a bacterial sample. The sample could also be mixed with liquefied gelatin medium. When the gelatin medium hardened, individual bacteria produced separate colonies. Despite its advantages, gelatin was not an ideal solidifying agent because it can be digested by many bacteria and melts at temperatures above 28°C. A better alternative was provided by Fannie Eilshemius Hesse, the wife of Walther Hesse, one of Koch’s assistants. She suggested the use of agar as a solidifying agent—she had been using it successfully to make jellies for some time. Agar was not attacked by most bacteria and did not melt until reaching a temperature of 100°C. Furthermore, once melted, it did not solidify until it reached a temperature of 50°C, eliminating the need to handle boiling liquid and providing time for manipulation of the medium. Some of the media developed by Koch and his associates, such as nutrient broth and nutrient agar, are still widely used. Another important tool developed in Koch’s laboratory was a container for holding solidified media—the petri dish (plate), named after Richard Petri, who devised it. Viral pathogens were also studied during this time. The discovery of viruses and their role in disease was made possible when Charles Chamberland (1851–1908), one of Pasteur’s associates, constructed a porcelain bacterial filter in 1884. Dimitri Ivanowski and Martinus Beijerinck used the filter to study tobacco mosaic disease. They found that plant extracts and sap from diseased plants were infectious, even after being filtered with Chamberland’s filter. Immunological Studies In this period progress also was made in determining how animals resisted disease and in developing techniques for protecting humans and livestock against pathogens. During studies on chicken cholera, Pasteur and Roux discovered that incubating their cultures for long intervals between transfers would attenuate the bacteria, which meant they had lost their ability to cause the disease. If the chickens were injected with these attenuated cultures, they remained healthy but developed the ability to resist the disease. He called the attenuated culture a vaccine [Latin vacca, cow] in honor of Edward Jenner because, many years earlier, Jenner had used material from cowpox lesions to protect people against smallpox. Shortly after this, Pasteur and Chamberland developed an attenuated anthrax vaccine in two ways: by treating cultures with potassium bichromate and by incubating the bacteria at 42 to 43°C. Pasteur next prepared rabies vaccine by a different approach. The pathogen was attenuated by growing it in an abnormal host, the rabbit. After infected rabbits had died, their brains and spinal cords were removed and dried. During the course of these studies, Joseph Meister, a nine-year-old boy who had been bitten by a rabid dog, was brought to Pasteur. Since the boy’s death was certain in the absence of treatment, Pasteur agreed to try vaccination. Joseph was injected 13 times over the next 10 days with increasingly virulent preparations of the attenuated virus. He survived. In gratitude for Pasteur’s development of vaccines, people from around the world contributed to the construction of the Pasteur Institute in Paris, France. One of the initial tasks of the Institute was vaccine production. After the discovery that the diphtheria bacillus produced a toxin, Emil von Behring (1854– 1917) and Shibasaburo Kitasato (1852–1931) injected inactivated toxin into rabbits, inducing them to produce an antitoxin, a substance in the blood that would inactivate the toxin and protect against the disease. A tetanus antitoxin was then prepared and both antitoxins were used in the treatment of people. The antitoxin work provided evidence that immunity could result from soluble substances in the blood, now known to be antibodies (humoral immunity). It became clear that blood cells were also important in immunity (cellular immunity) when Elie Metchnikoff (1845–1916) discovered that some blood leukocytes could engulf disease- causing bacteria. The scope and relevance of microbiology As the late scientist-writer Steven Jay Gould emphasized, we live in the Age of Bacteria. They were the first living organisms on our planet and live virtually everywhere life is possible. Furthermore, the whole biosphere depends on their activities, and they influence human society in countless ways. Because microorganisms play such diverse roles, modern microbiology is a large discipline with many different specialties; it has a great impact on fields such as medicine, agricultural and food sciences, ecology, genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology. One indication of the importance of microbiology is the Nobel Prize given for work in physiology or medicine. About one-third of these have been awarded to scientists working on microbiological problems. Microbiology has both basic and applied aspects. The basic aspects are concerned with the biology of microorganisms themselves and include such fields as bacteriology, virology, mycology (study of fungi), phycology or algology (study of algae), protozoology, microbial cytology and physiology, microbial genetics and molecular biology, microbial ecology, and microbial taxonomy. The applied aspects are concerned with practical problems such as disease, water and wastewater treatment, food spoilage and food production, and industrial uses of microbes. It is important to note that the basic and applied aspects of microbiology are intertwined. Basic research is often conducted in applied fields and applications often arise out of basic research. A discussion of some of the major fields of microbiology and the occupations they provide follows. One of the most active and important fields in microbiology is medical microbiology, which deals with diseases of humans and animals. Medical microbiologists identify the agents causing infectious diseases and plan measures for their control and elimination. Frequently they are involved in tracking down new, unidentified pathogens such as the agent that causes variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, (the human version of ―mad cow disease‖) the hantavirus, the West Nile virus, and the virus responsible for SARS. These microbiologists also study the ways in which microorganisms cause disease. Public health microbiology is closely related to medical microbiology. Public health microbiologists try to identify and control the spread of communicable diseases. They often monitor community food establishments and water supplies in an attempt to keep them safe and free from infectious disease agents. Immunology is concerned with how the immune system protects the body from pathogens and the response of infectious agents. It is one of the fastest growing areas in science; for example, techniques for the production and use of monoclonal antibodies have developed extremely rapidly. Immunology also deals with practical health problems such as the nature and treatment of allergies and autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis. Agricultural microbiology is concerned with the impact of microorganisms on agriculture. Agricultural microbiologists try to combat plant diseases that attack important food crops, work on methods to increase soil fertility and crop yields, and study the role of microorganisms living in the digestive tracts of ruminants such as cattle. Currently there is great interest in using bacterial and viral insect pathogens as substitutes for chemical pesticides. Microbial ecology is concerned with the relationships between microorganisms and the components of their living and nonliving habitats. Microbial ecologists study the global and local contributions of microorganisms to the carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles. The study of pollution effects on microorganisms also is important because of the impact these organisms have on the environment. Microbial ecologists are employing microorganisms in bioremediation to reduce pollution. Scientists working in food and dairy microbiology try to prevent microbial spoilage of food and the transmission of foodborne diseases such as botulism and salmonellosis. They also use microorganisms to make foods such as cheeses, yogurts, pickles, and beer. In the future, microorganisms themselves may become a more important nutrient source for livestock and humans. In 1929, Alexander Fleming discovered that the fungus Penicillium produced what he called penicillin, the first antibiotic that could successfully control bacterial infections. Although it took World War II for scientists to learn how to mass produce it, scientists soon found other microorganisms capable of producing additional antibiotics as well as compounds such as citric acid, vitamin B12, and monosodium glutamate. Today, industrial microbiologists use microorganisms to make products such as antibiotics, vaccines, steroids, alcohols and other solvents, vitamins, amino acids, and enzymes. Industrial microbiologists identify microbes of use to industry. They also engineer microbes with desirable traits and devise systems for culturing them and isolating the products they make. Microbiologists working in microbial physiology and biochemistry study many aspects of the biology of microorganisms. They may study the synthesis of antibiotics and toxins, microbial energy production, the ways in which microorganisms survive harsh environmental conditions, microbial nitrogen fixation, and the effects of chemical and physical agents on microbial growth and survival. Microbial genetics and molecular biology focus on the nature of genetic information and how it regulates the development and function of cells and organisms. The use of microorganisms has been very helpful in understanding gene structure and function. Microbial geneticists play an important role in applied microbiology because they develop techniques that are useful in agricultural microbiology, industrial microbiology, food and dairy microbiology, and medicine.

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser