Development of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies PDF

Development of carbon capture and utilization technologies to mitigate climate change Table of Contents summary Historical Background Technologies for Carbon Capture Approaches to Carbon Removal Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) Direct Air Capture (DAC) Challen...

Development of carbon capture and utilization technologies to mitigate climate change Table of Contents summary Historical Background Technologies for Carbon Capture Approaches to Carbon Removal Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) Direct Air Capture (DAC) Challenges and Considerations Carbon Utilization Techniques Overview Synthetic Fuels Building Materials Carbon Capture in Chemical Processes Algal Biofuels Economic and Policy Considerations Impact of Policies on Emission Mitigation Role of Government in Emission Reduction Effectiveness of Carbon Pricing Interactions Among Multiple Policies Considerations for Developing Countries Challenges and Limitations Capacity and Institutional Challenges Economic Viability Technical and Market Limitations Public Perception and Support Regulatory and Technological Constraints Future Prospects Technological Advancements Policy and Governance Frameworks Economic and Social Considerations Check https://storm.genie.stanford.edu/article/331994 for more details Stanford University Open Virtual Assistant Lab The generated report can make mistakes. Please consider checking important information. The generated content does not represent the developer's viewpoint. summary Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies represent a crucial strategy in the global effort to mitigate climate change by reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. By capturing CO2 emissions from industrial processes and directly from the atmosphere, CCU aims to transform this greenhouse gas into valuable products, thus creating economic incentives for emissions reductions. The development of CCU technologies gained momentum in response to escalating concerns about climate change, particularly after the late 20th century, with significant advancements demonstrated in both carbon capture and conversion methods. These technologies are increasingly recognized as essential components of international climate strate- gies, particularly in light of agreements like the Paris Agreement, which set ambitious targets for global emissions reductions. Notable advancements in CCU include various capture techniques, such as direct air capture (DAC) and point-source capture, which have been deployed in sectors like natural gas processing and power generation. Technologies such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) further illustrate the innovative approaches being explored to achieve net-negative emissions. While the potential for CCU to contribute to a low-carbon economy is significant, the technology faces challenges related to economic viability, scalability, and public acceptance. Additionally, contro- versies surrounding land use for bioenergy production and the potential competition with food resources have sparked debate among policymakers, scientists, and the public regarding the overall sustainability of these solutions. Despite these challenges, ongoing investments and research are focused on im- proving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of CCU technologies, making them more accessible and practical for widespread adoption. The integration of supportive policies and collaborative governance frameworks is crucial for overcoming the barriers to implementation, as effective climate action requires coordinated efforts across multiple sectors and stakeholders. As the global community continues to seek solutions to the climate crisis, CCU stands out as a promising yet complex field, underscoring the intersection of technology, policy, and societal values in the quest for a sustainable future. Historical Background The development of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies has its roots in the broader recognition of climate change and the need for sustainable solutions. As concerns regarding greenhouse gas emissions intensified, particularly in the late 20th century, researchers began exploring various methods to mitigate these emis- sions, leading to the emergence of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. One of the earliest demonstrations of direct air capture technology was conducted in 1999 by Lackner et al., showcasing the feasibility of large-scale CO2 capture from the atmosphere, which has since evolved toward commercial applications. Over the years, multiple technologies have been developed for CO2 capture, includ- ing post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel capture systems. These advance- ments have allowed for significant progress in capturing emissions from high-output sectors such as natural gas processing and power generation, although challenges remain in scaling these technologies to meet global demands. By the 2000s, the focus began to shift not only to capture but also to the utilization of CO2, aiming to transform captured carbon into commercially viable products and thus create an economic incentive for its reduction. The intersection of CCU and climate policy gained momentum with international agreements, most notably the Paris Agreement in 2015, which set ambitious tar- gets for emissions reductions. This spurred further investment in innovative projects across Europe and North America aimed at developing effective CCU technologies, with funding initiatives like the EU Green Deal Call exemplifying the growing commit- ment to a low-carbon future. Despite the progress made, economic and social concerns, particularly related to bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), have prompted debates on the potential competition for land use and food prices, which need to be addressed for large-scale deployments. As technology continues to advance, CCU is increasingly viewed as a crucial component of strategies to transition from fossil fuel dependency to a more sustainable, renewable energy landscape, with ongoing efforts to enhance the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of these technologies being essential for their future success. Technologies for Carbon Capture Carbon capture technologies are critical in mitigating climate change by reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from various sources. These technologies can be broadly categorized into point-source capture, which involves capturing CO2 from industrial facilities, and direct air capture (DAC), which extracts CO2 directly from the atmosphere. While point-source capture technologies are well-developed in certain sectors, such as natural gas processing, they still require further demonstra- tion in high-emission areas like power generation. DAC, on the other hand, is less mature but has been implemented at pilot scales. Approaches to Carbon Removal There are multiple approaches to carbon removal, including nature-based solutions and technological interventions. Nature-based solutions encompass afforestation, which involves converting non-forest land into forested areas, and reforestation, which re-establishes forests that have been cleared. Additionally, enhanced natural processes, such as improved land management and ocean fertilization, contribute to increasing the carbon storage capacity of soil and oceans, respectively. Among the technological solutions, Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) and DAC are notable methods utilized for carbon removal, especially in the energy sector's transition to net-zero emissions. Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) BECCS combines bioenergy production with carbon capture and storage, mak- ing it a vital tool for achieving carbon-negative energy systems. This method utilizes biomass as a source of energy while simultaneously capturing the CO2 emissions generated during biomass conversion. The captured CO2 can then be stored geologically or utilized in various applications, contributing to a net reduction in atmospheric CO2 levels. However, BECCS faces challenges such as land-use changes, potential impacts on food security, and biodiversity loss, which must be carefully managed. Direct Air Capture (DAC) DAC technologies extract CO2 directly from ambient air, offering a way to address residual emissions from sectors that are challenging to decarbonize. Current DAC systems utilize various methods, including liquid sorbents and solid sorbents, to efficiently capture CO2 for storage or use. Although DAC presents a smaller land footprint compared to other carbon removal options, it still encounters hurdles such as high operational costs and the need for significant technological advancements for widespread implementation. Challenges and Considerations Despite the promising potential of carbon capture technologies, several challenges impede their broader adoption. High costs, lengthy deployment times, and concerns over land-use changes are significant barriers. Additionally, there are potential negative impacts associated with certain technologies, such as ocean eutrophication from ocean fertilization approaches. To effectively implement carbon capture and utilization strategies, careful consideration of these challenges and potential side effects is essential to ensure sustainable outcomes in the fight against climate change. Carbon Utilization Techniques Overview Carbon utilization techniques involve converting captured carbon dioxide (CO2) into valuable products, effectively reducing greenhouse gas emissions while creating economic opportunities. These technologies leverage CO2 from various sources, including industrial emissions and the atmosphere, to produce fuels, chemicals, and materials. Synthetic Fuels Synthetic fuels are created by converting hydrogen and CO2 into long-chain hy- drocarbons, which can then be processed into usable fuels. The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is a prominent method in this domain, where carbon monoxide (CO) serves as a carbon source. For these synthetic fuels to be carbon-neutral, the CO2 must be sourced from biogenic processes or captured directly from the atmosphere using di- rect air capture (DAC) technologies. The production process is energy-intensive, requiring approximately 25 kWh of energy to produce one liter of synthetic kerosene, with a significant portion of this energy allocated to hydrogen production and CO2 capture. Building Materials CO2 can also be utilized in the construction industry, particularly in the production of building materials. One application is CO2 curing, where CO2 replaces water in concrete mixing, resulting in a more sustainable concrete product. This process not only sequesters CO2 but can also enhance the performance of concrete compared to traditional methods. Companies such as CarbonCure and Solidia are leading the commercialization of this technology, implementing CO2 curing across multiple facilities in North America. Carbon Capture in Chemical Processes Chemical absorption remains a prevalent method for CO2 separation and utilization. This process involves using a chemical solvent, such as ethanolamine compounds, to absorb CO2. Typically executed in two columns—one for absorption and another for regeneration—this method has been widely applied in various sectors, including power generation and industrial production. Notable projects employing chemical absorption technology include the Boundary Dam in Canada and the Petra Nova project in the United States. Algal Biofuels Microalgae present a promising avenue for carbon capture and utilization due to their high photosynthesis rates, which are significantly greater than those of terrestrial plants. Microalgae can be cultivated to produce biofuels, effectively converting atmos- pheric CO2 into biomass. They account for approximately 50% of global organic CO2 fixation, making them a crucial player in potential bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) pathways. Despite the technological advances in microalgae cultivation, commercial viability remains a challenge, with most operations currently at the pilot scale. Economic and Policy Considerations Impact of Policies on Emission Mitigation Policies aimed at carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies have demon- strated a significant impact on emission mitigation across various countries, sectors, and technologies, preventing the release of several gigatons of CO2 equivalent per year. Both market-based and regulatory policies play complementary roles in this context. While there has been a rapid increase in the share of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions subject to mitigation policy, considerable gaps remain in coverage, and many existing policies are not stringent enough to achieve substantial mitigation outcomes. Role of Government in Emission Reduction Governments can encourage low-emissions investments through public-private part- nerships and the establishment of 'green banks' that offer loans for environmentally friendly projects. Financial mechanisms such as public funding or contracts-for-dif- ference can help mitigate risks during the initial stages of technology deployment, thereby creating pathways to commercial viability for CCU technologies. Further- more, economic stimulus programs, particularly those implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, can support the development of low-emissions infrastruc- ture and technology. Effectiveness of Carbon Pricing Economic theories suggest that carbon pricing policies tend to be more cost-effective than traditional regulations or subsidies in reducing emissions. However, these policies can impose costs on regulated entities, and the potential for emissions leakage may arise if emissions-intensive firms face international competition from less regulated counterparts. Despite the increase in the number of pricing policies covering 21.5% of global GHG emissions as of 2020, effective coverage is often reduced by overlapping policies that can dilute the overall impact. Interactions Among Multiple Policies The interactions between different overlapping policies are critical in shaping effec- tive climate governance. Multiple policies can be justified when addressing various market failures or achieving distributional objectives. For instance, the coexistence of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) with vehicle emissions and energy efficiency standards exemplifies how different policies can work together to enhance mitigation outcomes. Considerations for Developing Countries For developing countries, the uncertainties associated with future development paths present challenges for policy formulation. Policymaking must be robust enough to perform satisfactorily under various plausible future scenarios, especially in rapidly growing economies where structural changes can significantly influence emissions trajectories. The successful integration of adaptation and mitigation strategies re- quires careful planning and knowledge exchange among local governments, national institutions, and funding partners to ensure that the co-benefits of such strategies are realized. Challenges and Limitations The development and deployment of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) tech- nologies face several significant challenges and limitations that can impede their effectiveness in mitigating climate change. Capacity and Institutional Challenges One of the primary hurdles is the capacity of governmental institutions to effectively implement and integrate CCU technologies within existing frameworks. Effective climate policy requires robust horizontal and vertical coordination among various levels of government, as well as implementation capacity that is often lacking in lower-income countries or regions. The independence of state institutions from pri- vate interests is crucial to ensure that CCU strategies are adopted for the public good rather than for the benefit of a select few. The training and availability of personnel skilled in CCU technology also directly impact the success of these initiatives, as governmental capacity shapes the choices available for climate institutions. Economic Viability Economic challenges associated with CCU technologies include the high costs of implementation and maintenance, which can deter investment. Carbon pricing is considered a more cost-effective method for reducing emissions compared to regu- lations or subsidies, but it also imposes costs on regulated entities. The potential for emissions leakage, where companies relocate to jurisdictions with less stringent regulations, further complicates the economic landscape for CCU deployment. As a result, firms engaged in emissions-intensive activities may face financial burdens that undermine their competitiveness. Technical and Market Limitations While technical solutions such as electric vehicles and smart grids are frequently promoted, they may not adequately address the needs of disadvantaged commu- nities that cannot afford such technologies. Furthermore, reliance on technical solutions can undermine indigenous knowledge and the unique circumstances of lower-income countries. The focus on technological and market outcomes often results in policies that inadvertently leave certain populations behind, perpetuating social inequities. Public Perception and Support Public perception of CCU technologies and related policies can also present a challenge. Surveys indicate that public support for climate governance often hinges on the framing of policies in conjunction with broader economic and social reforms. Misunderstandings regarding the level of support for mitigation measures can lead to underestimation of public willingness to adopt such technologies, creating a feedback loop that diminishes political will. Regulatory and Technological Constraints Regulatory policies that mandate specific compliance pathways can inadvertently lock in high-cost solutions while neglecting potentially lower-cost alternatives. This rigidity can stifle innovation and hinder the emergence of more effective technolo- gies. Moreover, the complexity of comparing policy effectiveness across jurisdictions further complicates the landscape for implementing CCU technologies. Future Prospects The future of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies holds significant potential for mitigating climate change, particularly through enhanced technological innovation and collaborative governance. The Sustainable Development Scenario suggests that with ambitious technological advancements, the energy sector could reach net-zero emissions within five decades, mirroring the success stories of the fastest clean energy technology innovations in history. Moreover, the Faster In- novation Case proposes that a more rapid deployment of new technologies could accelerate this transition, aiming for net-zero emissions by 2050. Technological Advancements In order to achieve these ambitious targets, significant advancements in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies are essential. CCUS not only has the potential to contribute to net-negative emissions through biomass-fuelled power plants but also addresses the increasing need for system flexibility as the share of variable renewable energy sources grows. The International Energy Agency (IEA) notes that ongoing project developments in CCUS are witnessing year-on-year growth, suggesting a positive trajectory towards meeting future climate goals. However, achieving the necessary capture and storage capacity by 2030 will require substantial reductions in project lead times, alongside the introduction of innovative business models that foster CCUS hubs. Policy and Governance Frameworks Effective governance and strategic partnerships are crucial for the advancement of CCU technologies. State and local authorities play a pivotal role in implementing experiments that lead to technological learning and shifts in policies and prac- tices. Collaborative planning approaches, including partnerships between private and public entities, can enhance the effectiveness of mitigation efforts beyond direct government control, particularly in sectors such as residential energy use and emissions from local businesses. Institutions providing credible knowledge and facilitating participatory decision-making can help mediate interests and build consensus around long-term climate pathways. Economic and Social Considerations The transition towards a low-carbon future is anticipated to create both winners and losers, emphasizing the need for institutions that can mediate these dynamics. Renewable energy developments, facilitated by CCU technologies, have the potential to stimulate local economies, support microenterprise development, and contribute to poverty reduction. These initiatives may also generate indirect effects, promoting knowledge sharing and capacity building that further drive sustainability. References : Decarbonization: Status, Challenges, and Policy Options for Carbon... : CCUS technology innovation – CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions... : Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Market Analysis - 2030 : What is carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) and what role can it... : Driving the green revolution: the crucial role of carbon capture and... : Building skills and capabilities in Carbon Capture and Storage - RPS Group : Prospects of carbon capture, utilization and storage for mitigating... : Four Applications of Carbon Capture and Utilization | BCG : CCUS in the transition to net-zero emissions : Process intensification technologies for CO2 capture and conversion – a... : Chapter 13: National and sub-national policies and institutions - IPCC : It is time for CCUS to deliver – Analysis - IEA