Civil Law: Resolving Civil Disputes & Negligence

Summary

This document provides a summary of civil law, focusing on resolving disputes, negligence and other torts. It covers topics such as the Canadian justice system, small claims courts, the court of appeal, and burden of proof. The document also discusses damages, remedies, and legal concepts like defamation of character.

Full Transcript

Civil Law -​ Settles controversies between individuals and/or parties -​ Person v Person, Person v Party, Party v Party -​ Main purpose is to compensate victims -​ Only the victim (plaintiff) can bring the case to court -​ Examples of cases: injuries from one person, damage to propert...

Civil Law -​ Settles controversies between individuals and/or parties -​ Person v Person, Person v Party, Party v Party -​ Main purpose is to compensate victims -​ Only the victim (plaintiff) can bring the case to court -​ Examples of cases: injuries from one person, damage to property or reputation, unpaid debts, tort actions (wrongdoing) Remedy -​ A procedure in which the people at fault pay for the damage they have caused - e.g. injunctions restitution, punishment, and deterrence -​ When a person can prove that they suffered injury and/or loss due to the other person’s actions, then they will be rewarded a remedy ​ Compensation ○​ Putting the person back in a state they were before the incident, sometimes even better ○​ The most important purpose of civil law ​ Canada’s Justice System ○​ Criminal and Civil charges happen independently in separate courts ​ Small Claims Courts ○​ Aka the people’s court ○​ Money and property disputes - no jury or lawyers here ○​ Claims range between $3000-$25000 ​ Provincial Supreme Court ○​ Above small claims ○​ Usually represented by lawyers ○​ Judge or jury - 6 jury members & reaches a decision by majority vote ​ Court of Appeal ○​ Hearing appeals from lower courts ○​ Tried by min of 3 max of 7 judges ○​ Depending on the case, decision is either majority or unanimous ○​ After the decision, judges will state their reasoning for their vote ​ Federal Court of Canada ○​ Federal Government, government employees, federal income taxes, patents, copyrights and trademarks ○​ They have their own Appeal Division ​ Supreme Court of Canada ○​ Highest court in the country ○​ Only hears cases from the Federal Court and the province’s Court of Appeal Lesson 2- Resolving Civil Disputes ​ Plaintiff: The one who is suing ​ Defendant: The one who is being sued ​ Litigation: Process of suing ​ Litigant: The partie(s) suing ​ Minor: Anyone under the age of 18 ​ Litigation Guardian: A legal guardian acting on behalf of a minor ​ Limitation Period: The amount of time from the case in which the action must be made (6 months) ​ Balance of Probabilities: The burden of proof is on the plaintiff -​ They must prove the series of events happened in the way that they claim ○​ Defendant will try to prove that the Plaintiff’s version of the story was wrong AND their version of the story is correct ○​ Judge or jury will decide which story is more credible ​ Filing & Serving a Claim ○​ 1) Before filing a lawsuit, one must find a cause of action ○​ 2) After finding a cause of action, you will figure out which court the trial will take place (depending on how much money in involved) ​ Filing A Claim in Small Courts ○​ The following information must be submitted by hand the court of choice: ​ The Plaintiff’s full name and address ​ The Defendant’s full name and address ​ The amount of money being claimed ​ A brief summary of the reason for the claims ○​ Court fees varies on the amount being claimed ○​ The fee is added by the court to the claim ○​ Once a defendant receives a claim they have two options: ​ 1) Pay the amount claimed to the court ​ 2) Prepare a defence of why they shouldn’t pay the amount claimed (*defence must be prepared within 10-30 days within receiving the claim*) ○​ Payment into Court ​ IF the defence feels they should only have to pay a part of the claim, they could pay the amount they think is reasonable to the small claims office ​ THEN the plaintiff decides whether to take the amount provided OR to pursue a court case to obtain the full amount ○​ A Counterclaim ​ When the defendant sues the plaintiff and claims an amount to compensate for their own issues ​ MUST relate to the original issue ○​ Third Party Claim ​ Defendant can shift part or all of the blame to a third party ​ If the defendant wanted to split claim with the third party ○​ Default Judgement ​ If the defendant does not reply to the claim within 10-30 days of the claim, the plaintiff automatically wins the case and gets the full amount claimed ○​ Out of Court Settlement ​ Plaintiff and Defendant can decide to settle out of court at any time ​ The plaintiff must decide to risk not getting any money and go to court to try and receive the full claim OR to settle for a smaller claim ​ Filing a Claim in Higher Court ○​ A claim in higher court is called a statement of claim ○​ The defence is known as as the statement of defence ○​ Defendant and Plaintiff send documents back and forth for a long time to try and settle the case before court ○​ Examination of Discovery ​ Ask/answer session between Litigants and their lawyers ​ Purpose to eliminate any surprises in court ​ Both parties must disclose all relevant documents ​ Both questions parties ask are oath (sworn to be true) ​ The Trial ○​ If no settlement is reached, it’s time for court! ○​ Judge or jury (6 members) but a jury is uncommon in a civil case ○​ Both parties have an opportunity to call witnesses, present facts, and make statements themselves (Plaintiff goes first) ○​ After the litigants have presented their information and statements, the judge (or jury) will make a final verdict ○​ ** Look at chart on slide 19 ** ​ The 5 Damages ○​ 1) General Damages: needs to be precisely calculated and require court judgement - has to fair to both sides (suffering, care, income) ○​ 2) Special Damages: debt to the plaintiff had leading up to the trial ○​ 3) Punitive Damages: occur when the court wants to penalize the defendant for negligent behaviour - intentional torts ○​ 4) Aggravated Damages: awarded when a defendant’s behaviour harms the plaintiff ○​ 5) Nominal Damages: result in a very small total ($1-100) ​ Remedies ○​ Injunctions ​ Non cash compensation award where a certain condition is met ○​ Costs ​ The defendant pays the court and legal fees of the other party ​ The contingency fee system allows those who cannot afford legal fees to accelerate legal action by paying a lawyer a percentage of the compensation if they win - DOES NOT EXIST IN ONTARIO ○​ Garnishment ​ Required when a court order is needed to oblige a third party to make a payment into court towards the losing defendant ○​ Seizing Assets ​ Required when a debtor cannot settle a payment ○​ Examination of a Debtor ​ Debtors will be questioned in court to determine assets, income, other debts, etc. ○​ ADR: Review the three types!! ​ Meditation ​ Arbitration ​ Negotiation Lesson 3- Negligence & Other Torts ​ Tort ○​ A “wrong” committed either intentionally or unintentionally ○​ Allows people to sue for damages inflicted in a court of civil law ○​ E.g. personal property, pets, involvement in sports, personal freedom/reputation ○​ Tort of negligence is the most important area of tort law ​ Negligence ○​ Action is unintentional ○​ Unplanned ○​ A injury is inflicted ○​ Carelessly injuring a person or property must result in compensation for that damage ​ Intentional Tort ○​ When one deliberately inflicts harm or injury to another person ○​ They have intent and have foreseeability ○​ Intent is the true purpose of an act ○​ Foreseeability is the ability to predict what could result in an action caused by the indicator ​ Duty of Care ○​ Plaintiff must prove the defendant owed a duty of care ○​ Duty of care is the equivalent to when legal duty is placed upon you to meet expectations ○​ A breach of duty of care is determined when the defendant was unable to meet the duty of care of a “reasonable person” ​ The Reasonable Person ○​ The ideal representation of someone that makes the decisions endorsed by the court ​ No physical or mental developmental disorders ​ Thoughtful and caring in most situations ​ Minor & Duty of Care ○​ Children are not considered a reasonable person ○​ Courts will make case by case decisions if a minor has liability ○​ Minor engaging in adult activities will hold a similar duty of care ​ Causation ○​ Plaintiff must prove the Defendant is responsible for their harm ○​ Direct connection between the Defendant’s negligence and the Plaintiff’s claim ​ Burden of Proof ○​ This is on the Plaintiff they must provide the negligence components required ​ Defences for Negligence ○​ Negligence was not present ○​ Defendant did not owe Plaintiff any duty of care ○​ Plaintiff was also negligent ○​ Plaintiff assumed risk voluntarily ​ Contributory Negligence ○​ If both parties are negligent damages are divided amongst both of them ○​ Burden of proof is on the Defendant to prove the Plaintiff’s contributory negligence ​ Voluntary Risk of Assumption ○​ Only works in the defendant’s favour when they can prove that the Plaintiff knew the risk of the situation/actions and made the decision to assume risk ​ Inevitable Accident ○​ Harm or loss could be the outcome of an unavoidable situation regardless of the precautions a person could have taken Lesson 4- Civil Chapters ​ Occupier Liability ○​ When a person owns a property and is responsible for the property to be safe who enter it ○​ Three types of people who could enter a property ​ Invitees ​ Is owed the highest standard of care ​ E.g. Students, Store Customers, Delivery people, Service coming to repairs ​ Licensees ​ A person who enters the property with the occupiers permission ​ E.g. a friend who has been asked for dinner ​ Trespassers ​ Entering a property who isn’t yours without any permission or legal right to be there ​ When occupiers are aware of trespassers, they must use reasonable standard of care ​ Special duty- to those who have a pool or jungle gym ​ Occupier’s Liability Act ○​ Invitees and Licensees are similar which makes it hard to decide who is who ○​ Decision was made to treat them both equally and have both receive the same duty of care ​ Commercial & Social Host Invitees ○​ Restaurant and bar owners now have a specific duty of care to any customers who are intoxicated ○​ Trying to prevent and harm or injury happening to a third party - e.g. drunk driving ​ Motor Vehicle Negligence ○​ This will often lead to both criminal and civil actions ○​ Violating any traffic acts results in driver negligence ○​ If both parties are at fault for an accident, liability will be split between them ​ Liability for Passengers ○​ A driver is liable for its passengers ○​ IF a passenger gets into a car knowing the driver is intoxicated - the driver uses the voluntary assumption ○​ IF a passenger gets into a car not knowing the driver is intoxicated- it is not a voluntary assumption ○​ Drivers must ensures their passengers are wearing a seatbelt ​ Vicarious Liability ○​ Employers are personally liable for torts committed by their employees during work hours ​ Professional Negligence ○​ The more professional and specialized the person is, the higher standard of care the law and society expects ○​ Doctor’s duty of care to the patient is called medical negligence ​ Patients must be made aware of all risks associated with any procedure being done ​ Medical battery is when a patient is treated with no consent ​ Assault & Battery ○​ In tort law, assault is when a victim has a fear of bodily harm may occur ○​ Battery is the most common form of trespass to another person which involves intentional touching ​ Nuisance ○​ Involves one person’s unreasonable use of land that interferes with the enjoyment and use of adjoining land by other persons and/or community ​ Intentional or unintentional ​ Defences for Trespass ○​ Consent ​ The plaintiff willingly consented to the action ○​ Self-defence ​ Force cannot be excessive ​ Reasonable and necessary to prevent personal injury ○​ Defence of others or property ​ A third party can come to the aid of a person if it is reasonable to assume that the person is in some degree of immediate danger ​ Property owners may use reasonable force to eject intruders ○​ Legal authority ​ E.g. police have the right to detain individuals in the course of a valid arrest ○​ Necessity ​ If entering the property was strictly necessary ​ Defamation of Character ○​ Defamation: an unjustified or untrue attack on a person’s reputation ​ Intentional or unintentional, MUST lower the person’s reputation ○​ Slander: defamation through spoken words, sounds, physical gestures, or facial expressions ○​ Libel: more permanent visible or audible form than slander, such as radio ​ Defences for Defamation ○​ True and justified ○​ Absolute privilege ○​ Qualified privilege ○​ Fair comment ​ Motor vehicle Insurance ○​ Everyone is legally required to purchase motor vehicle liability insurance ○​ When a claim is being made, the three parties involved are: the person who caused the accident, the insurance company, and the victim who claims damages