Summary

This document contains a list and explanation of various sources of evidence for common ancestry. It explores evolution as a population-level phenomenon with examples. It also summarises the concept of natural selection and the explanation of its improvement of organismal adaptiveness.

Full Transcript

‭Diverse living species show common ancestry [evidence of CA]‬ ‭.‬ 1 ‭List and explain four sources of evidence for common ancestry‬ ‭-‬ ‭Common ancestry‬‭is the idea of tracing back lineages‬‭of living species far back enough,‬ ‭those species share a‬‭common ancestors‬...

‭Diverse living species show common ancestry [evidence of CA]‬ ‭.‬ 1 ‭List and explain four sources of evidence for common ancestry‬ ‭-‬ ‭Common ancestry‬‭is the idea of tracing back lineages‬‭of living species far back enough,‬ ‭those species share a‬‭common ancestors‬ ‭-‬ ‭The biogeographic‬‭pattern of similar species‬‭clustered‬‭in geographical areas‬ ‭-‬ ‭Homologies‬‭are structures that have‬‭deep similarities‬‭between species‬ ‭-‬ ‭Studies of‬‭fossils‬‭show that some fossils share identical‬‭characteristics‬ ‭-‬ ‭Transitional fossils‬‭that have some not all of the‬‭derived traits of a living group‬ ‭-‬ ‭Nested structures of taxonomic groups‬‭, beginning from‬‭an ancestor and radiating‬ ‭like the‬‭branches from a tree,‬‭within groups (without‬‭overlaps)‬ ‭-‬ ‭Separate ancestry is incorrect‬ ‭2.‬ ‭ xplain why evidence of common ancestry means that evolution must have occurred‬ E ‭-‬ ‭accumulating‬‭differences‬‭since they last shared that‬‭ancestor. Therefore,‬‭evolution‬ ‭must have occurred to explain these differences.‬ ‭ volution is a population-level phenomenon [population level]‬ E ‭.‬ 1 ‭Associate evolution with changes in frequency in a population (not changes in individuals)‬ ‭-‬ ‭Evolution‬‭is the change in the‬‭frequency of genetic‬‭variants in a population over generations‬ ‭Continuing until one variant is‬‭fixed‬‭, meaning that‬‭all other variants become extinct‬ ‭-‬ ‭It is not about individuals changing, but about the‬‭population-level‬‭change in‬‭genetic composition‬‭.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Evolution only happens when a population has genetic variation‬ ‭-‬ ‭Population of white flowers, if one flower produces a purple flower offspring due to genetic‬ ‭Mutation, you now have a population of purple flowers (genetic variation)‬ ‭-‬ ‭Polymorphic‬‭population, change in the frequency of‬‭the variants,‬ ‭multiple variants within a population‬ ‭-‬ ‭Variants in traits exist, and evolution will continue to act on populations‬ ‭-‬ ‭Evolution does not require selection‬ ‭Natural selection explains adaptation [selection concept]‬ ‭.‬ 1 ‭Explain why natural selection tends to improve organismal adaptiveness‬ ‭-‬ ‭Natural selection‬‭favors‬‭genetic variants‬‭that‬‭enhance/increases‬‭fitness‬‭to go to fixation‬ ‭and variants that reduce fitness to be loss from the population‬ ‭-‬ ‭Increase frequency‬‭in populations over time‬ ‭-‬ ‭Natural selection can occur on‬‭multiple alleles‬ ‭-‬ ‭Natural selection is non-random‬ ‭-‬ ‭Populations over time are not random but are adaptive because of natural selection‬ ‭-‬ ‭natural selection, by definition, favors traits that‬‭increase fitness‬‭(i.e., enhance survival or‬ ‭reproduction). Traits that actively reduce fitness would not be favored by natural selection‬ ‭-‬ ‭natural selection does not guarantee that all traits are‬‭currently beneficial‬ -‭ ‬ ‭Traits that evolved by natural selection may no longer be beneficial because‬‭environments‬ ‭change over time‬‭. What was once adaptive in a previous‬‭environment may become neutral or‬ ‭even maladaptive when the environment shifts.‬ ‭ he history of common ancestry is depicted in phylogenetic tree diagrams‬ T ‭1.‬ ‭Identify the different parts of a phylogenetic tree (clade, root, node, branch, sister taxa)‬ ‭-‬ ‭A branching diagram is a‬‭phylogenetic tree‬ ‭-‬ ‭Remove tips or clades from a tree without changing the topology is called‬‭pruning‬ ‭-‬ ‭The point(base) of the tree‬‭where time enters the‬‭deepest ancestry of the‬ ‭the group is called the‬‭root‬ ‭-‬ ‭The bulk of the tree is composed of‬‭branches‬‭, some‬‭are internal some are external‬ ‭The lines on the diagram, which represent‬‭population‬‭lineages‬ ‭-‬ ‭Where a‬‭population lineage splits‬‭into two,‬‭nodes‬‭of a tree, represents‬‭lineage splitting‬ ‭-‬ ‭Last common ancestor of the clade marked by the node‬ ‭-‬ ‭When the descendant lineages first became genetically isolated‬ ‭-‬ ‭A grouping of branches and tips that includes‬‭all‬‭descendants‬‭of a single ancestral lineage‬ ‭Is a‬‭clade‬ ‭-‬ ‭A named group of biological organisms often shown at the‬‭tips‬‭of the tree called‬‭taxa‬ ‭-‬ ‭Sister taxa: Two taxa‬‭that share an immediate‬‭common‬‭ancestor‬‭and represent the‬ ‭most closely related lineages in a tree.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Explain how geographic isolation can result in lineage splitting and associate this‬ ‭phenomenon with nodes in a phylogenetic tree.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Lineage splitting;‬‭The continuous population that‬‭gets split into two‬ ‭-‬ ‭subpopulations‬‭by climate change or geological‬ ‭-‬ ‭Large population on one land mass and a rare event, if the new landmass is‬ ‭Far away then the new population can immediately be genetically isolated from the first allowing it‬ ‭To evolve independently‬ ‭-‬ ‭Split population at a node‬ ‭-‬ ‭Geographic isolation‬‭allows populations to accumulate‬‭differences over time until they come‬ ‭To be different in visible ways‬ ‭-‬ ‭Two populations that end up separated from one another so they stop exchanging genes‬ ‭-‬ ‭Geographic isolation‬‭can fragment a‬‭continuous population‬‭into separate subpopulations‬ ‭that no longer exchange genes, leading to‬‭independent‬‭evolution‬‭.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭List the clades present in a phylogenetic tree and use this to determine if two trees have‬ ‭4.‬ ‭the same Topology‬ ‭-‬ ‭Clade can be removed from the root with a single cut‬ ‭-‬ ‭All members of a clade share a more recent ancestor than they share with any lineage outside‬ ‭The clade‬ ‭-‬ ‭A list of all the clades that a tree contains is a‬‭tree topology‬ ‭ elatedness is equivalent to recency of common ancestry‬ R ‭1.‬‭Determine the relative degree of evolutionary relationship‬‭from phylogenetic trees of‬ ‭various types‬ -‭ ‬ t‭he degree of‬‭relatedness‬‭is determined by the‬‭recency of the common ancestor‬‭.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Taxa‬‭that share a‬‭more recent common ancestor‬‭are‬‭more closely related‬‭than‬ ‭taxa that share a common ancestor further back in time.‬ -‭ ‬ ‭-‬ ‭All taxa in a clade are more closely related to one another than they are to any taxon outside‬ ‭Of the clade‬ ‭-‬ ‭Members of a clade are equally related to any species outside of that clade‬ ‭-‬ ‭The same tree topology has the same clades, but different clades are not the same tree topology‬ ‭ volution is a branching process that is not goal directed or able to plan ahead‬ E ‭[non - progressive evolution]‬ ‭.‬ 1 ‭Explain why evolutionary advancement is not a meaningful concept.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Evolutionary advancement‬‭is not meaningful because‬‭evolution‬‭is not‬‭goal-directed‬‭or aimed at producin ‭to fit their respective environments.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Describe the evolutionary history of a clade of interest‬‭in non-progressive terms.‬ ‭-‬ ‭The ability to use the metaphor of a phylogenetic tree to convey accurate‬ ‭Evolutionary information is‬‭tree thinking‬ ‭-‬ ‭The‬‭evolutionary history‬‭of a clade can be described‬‭as a‬‭series of branching events‬‭that‬ ‭led to‬‭diverse lineages,‬‭all of which have adapted‬‭to different environments. No lineage‬ ‭is inherently‬‭higher or more advanced‬‭than others,‬‭as‬‭evolution‬‭is a‬‭branching process‬ ‭influenced by‬‭chance events‬‭and‬‭natural selection‬‭,‬‭without any direction or goal‬ ‭ he traits of organisms are a summation of changes along their ancestral lineage‬ T ‭[summation of traits]‬ ‭1.‬ ‭List the expected characteristic of tips based on changes mapped onto a tree‬ ‭-‬ ‭The‬‭tips‬‭of a phylogenetic tree represent the‬‭living‬‭species‬‭, and their characteristics are‬ ‭summations of changes‬‭that have occurred along their‬‭respective‬‭lineages‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Correctly associate trait changes with internodes (not nodes)‬ ‭ he‬‭trait changes‬‭happen along the‬‭internodes‬‭(branches)‬‭and not at the‬‭nodes‬‭.‬ T ‭The‬‭nodes‬‭represent the splitting of lineages, not‬‭the specific trait changes.‬ ‭ iological taxonomy is based on phylogenetic relatedness‬ B ‭[clade taxonomy]‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Identify clades, and only clades, as worthy of formal names‬ ‭-‬ ‭Clades‬‭are groups of species that include a common‬‭ancestor and all its descendants.‬ ‭Only‬‭clades‬‭are worthy of formal names because they‬‭reflect true evolutionary relationships.‬ ‭In Figure‬‭3-3‬‭, groups like‬‭(land plants, red algae)‬‭form a‬‭clade‬‭and therefore can be given‬ ‭a formal‬‭taxonomic name‬‭. In contrast,‬‭(archaea, bacteria)‬‭alone is not a clade because‬ ‭it does not include all descendants of their common ancestor.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Explain why tree like relationships yield a nested hierarchical taxonomy so long as the taxonomy‬ ‭is based on traits that only evolved once and are never lost‬ ‭-‬ ‭A‬‭nested hierarchical taxonomy‬‭results from‬‭traits‬‭that evolve once and are never lost,‬ ‭reflecting the‬‭tree-like branching‬‭of evolution.‬.‭‬ ‭Phylogenetic trees provide information about evolutionary history, including trait homology‬ ‭[trait evolution and homology]‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Determine the most parsimonious history (or histories) of character state changes for a‬ ‭binary trait on a given tree.‬ ‭The‬‭most-parsimonious history‬‭is the one that requires‬‭the‬‭fewest evolutionary changes‬‭.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Determine whether a character state in two taxa is homologous, given a mapping of‬ ‭trait changes on a tree‬ ‭-‬ ‭The character state‬‭is homologous if it arose from‬‭a single evolutionary event‬‭and is passed‬ ‭down through common ancestry. In Figure‬‭3-6‬‭, the‬‭nectar spur‬‭in both‬‭circled flowers‬‭is‬‭homologous‬ ‭because it evolved in the common ancestor of both species and was retained in all descendants.‬ ‭In contrast, in Figure‬‭3-7‬‭, the spurs are‬‭not homologous‬‭because they evolved‬‭independently‬ ‭in each lineage (i.e.,‬‭convergent evolution‬‭).‬ ‭ volution is a change in the frequency of genetic variation in a population[ evolution definition]‬ E ‭1.‬ ‭Explain how heritable variation arises from allelic variation in a population‬ ‭-‬ ‭Natural selection is heritable variation in fitness in a natural population‬ ‭-‬ ‭Evolution can occur when there is‬‭heritable genetic‬‭variation‬‭that affects a trait‬ ‭-‬ ‭Differences in the versions of alleles present within individuals that are passed on in generations‬ ‭-‬ ‭Heritable variation‬‭arises due to‬‭differences in alleles‬‭present at a locus in a population.‬ ‭For example, the‬‭A1‬‭and‬‭A2‬‭alleles in the‬‭moss population‬‭result in‬‭different leaf colors‬‭,‬ ‭which contribute to‬‭heritable differences‬‭. Allelic‬‭variation at‬‭many loci‬‭can affect‬‭continuous‬ ‭traits‬‭like height or weight, resulting in a‬‭bell-shaped‬‭distribution‬‭of the trait in the population‬ ‭.‬ 2 ‭ istinguish examples of evolution from other kinds of change, such as plasticity‬ D ‭-‬ ‭Plasticity is short term, individuals, not inherited‬ ‭-‬ ‭Evolution‬‭refers to changes in the‬‭frequency of alleles‬‭in a population over generations,‬ ‭while‬‭plasticity‬‭refers to‬‭phenotypic changes‬‭that‬‭result solely from environmental influences without‬ ‭altering genetic material. For instance, increasing the height of‬‭violets‬‭with‬‭fertilizer‬‭is‬‭not evolution‬ ‭but‬‭plasticity‬‭. However, the‬‭increased frequency of tuskless elephants‬‭in Uganda due to‬ ‭poaching‬‭is an example of‬‭evolution‬‭by‬‭natural selection‬‭.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Fitness of homozygotes and heterozygous, allele frequency, population size all‬ ‭alter the probability that an allele goes to fixation‬ ‭ volution entails a change in allele frequency [allele frequency]‬ E ‭1.‬ ‭Interpret a frequency through a time plot applying the terms evolution, fixation, extinction, and‬ ‭polymorphic/polymorphism.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Genotype‬‭- genetic makeup‬ ‭-‬ ‭Phenotype‬‭- measurable attributes, physical and behavioral‬ ‭-‬ ‭Fixation‬‭- occurs when an allele’s frequency reaches‬‭1.0 (or 100%)‬ ‭-‬ ‭Polymorphism‬‭refers to the presence of two or more‬‭alleles at a locus within a population.‬ ‭-‬ ‭A population is said to be‬‭polymorphic‬‭if there is‬‭more than one allele‬‭with a frequency‬ ‭Are present‬ ‭-‬ ‭Extinction‬‭- the loss of an allele from a population, which happens when its frequency drops to 0‬ ‭.‬ 2 ‭Be able to calculate the frequency of an allele given the frequency of genotypes.‬ ‭3.‬ -‭ Frequency of allele‬‭A‬‭: p=‬‭2‬‭𝑁𝐴𝐴‬ + ‭‬‭𝑁𝐴𝑎‬‭‬‭/‬‭‬‭2‭𝑁 ‬ 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙‬ ‭1-q = p‬ ‭‬ ‭Frequency of allele‬‭a‬‭(q): 2Naa + NAa / 2Ntotal‬ ‭1-p = q‬ ‭ xample; 30% are A1A1, 20% are A1A2, and 50% are A2A2, the frequency of A1‬ E ‭is 0.3 + (0.2/2) = 0.4‬ ‭Allele frequency and genotype frequency can be related by the Hardy- Weinberg‬ l‭aw [Hardy Weinberg]‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Use the Hardy-Weinberg law to calculate expected genotype frequencies given random mating‬ ‭-‬ ‭p+q=1‬ ‭-‬ ‭p2 for‬‭AA/A1A1‬ ‭-‬ ‭2pq for Aa/A1A2‬ ‭-‬ ‭q2 for aa/A2A2‬ ‭ itness is the expected reproductive output of a genotype relative to other genotypes [relative fitness]‬ F ‭1.‬ ‭Associate fitness with an interaction between a genotype and an environment.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Fitness is determined by the interaction between an organism's genotype and its environment.‬ ‭The reproductive success of a genotype depends on how well it matches the conditions of its environment.‬ ‭For example, the melanistic form of the peppered moth had higher fitness in a polluted environment‬ ‭where dark tree trunks provided better camouflage, but the wild-type moth had higher fitness in a‬ ‭lichen-rich environment.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Calculate relative fitness for genotypes given data on reproductive output.‬ ‭-Relative fitness is calculated by dividing the reproductive output of each genotype by the reproductive‬ ‭output of the genotype with the highest reproductive success. For example, if the reproductive output of the‬ ‭melanistic moth in a sooty environment is 100 and that of the wild-type moth is 43, the relative fitness of the‬ ‭melanistic moth is‬‭1.0‬‭and the relative fitness of‬‭the wild-type moth is‬‭0.43‬‭.‬ ‭ irectional selection tends to increase the frequency of high-fitness alleles until they become fixed‬ D ‭[directional selection]‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Predict allele frequency change by directional selection given information on‬ ‭genotype fitness.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Directional selection will cause the frequency of an allele with higher relative fitness to‬ ‭increase over time.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Explain why directional selection removes genetic‬‭variation‬‭from populations.‬ ‭ irectional selection favors certain alleles that provide a fitness advantage, leading these alleles‬ D ‭to become fixed while disfavored alleles are lost. This reduces the overall genetic variation in a‬ ‭population as the advantageous allele reaches a frequency of‬‭1‬‭and other alleles go extinct.‬ -‭ ‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Explain the role of directional selection in keeping genetic diseases at low frequency.‬ ‭Genetic diseases are often kept at‬‭low frequencies‬‭in populations because‬ ‭directional selection acts against alleles that‬‭reduce‬‭fitness‬‭. When an allele causes a‬ ‭deleterious phenotype, selection tends to reduce its frequency, limiting the spread‬ ‭of genetic disorders in the population.‬ ‭.‬ 4 ‭Predict the direction of phenotypic change by directional‬‭selection acting on a continuously‬ ‭varying trait‬ ‭Directional selection will shift the mean value of a trait in the direction of‬‭higher fitness.‬ ‭For example, if taller giraffes have higher fitness due to their ability to reach more food, directional‬ ‭selection will lead to an increase in the average height of giraffes over generations.‬ ‭ utation is the ultimate source of all genetic variation [mutation]‬ M ‭1.‬ ‭Give examples of mutation at the molecular level.‬ ‭a nucleotide substitution changes one base for another in a DNA sequence,‬ ‭potentially altering the function of the genes‬ ‭.‬ 2 ‭Explain why deleterious and neutral mutations are usually more common than‬ ‭beneficial ones.‬ ‭Mutations increase allelic diversity in a population (genetic variation)‬ ‭Deleterious and neutral mutations‬‭are more common‬‭than beneficial ones because‬ ‭most mutations disrupt existing functional systems‬‭of a gene (negative effects)‬ ‭beneficial mutations that improve function are rare and typically require precise changes.‬ ‭.‬ 3 ‭Explain why the rate at which mutation generates a trait is independent of whether‬ ‭that trait would be favorable‬ ‭Mutations can generate new allele whose frequency can then be change by natural selection‬ ‭Mutations are‬‭independent‬‭of the fitness of the resulting‬‭allele‬ ‭Mutations occur‬‭randomly‬‭and‬‭independent of whether‬‭the trait is favorable‬‭or not.‬ ‭The‬‭environment does not influence the mutation rate‬‭,‬‭meaning that beneficial‬ ‭mutations arise‬‭by chance‬ ‭Most trait variation in natural populations is due to variation at many loci, interacting with‬ ‭Environmental variation‬ ‭most variation results from an interaction between allelic variation at many loci‬ ‭(each allele having a small affect) and additional variation due to the environment.‬ ‭Genetic drift‬ ‭-‬ ‭An allele can‬‭increase in frequency even if it does‬‭not increase fitness (lowers fitness)‬ ‭-‬ ‭An allele’s frequency can‬‭fluctuate over time‬ ‭-‬ ‭An allele can be‬‭lost from a population‬‭even if it‬‭does‬‭not have lower fitness‬ ‭-‬ ‭Fewer alleles per locus‬‭in a small populations‬ ‭-‬ ‭Changes in allele frequency (evolution) occurs even without selection‬ ‭Directional selection‬ ‭-‬ ‭In small populations, chance fluctuations in allele frequencies tend to be larger and more commo ‭-‬ ‭Larger populations take forever to become fixed or extinct, jags are less dramatic‬ ‭-‬ ‭Directional selection tends to remove genetic variation from the population‬ ‭by driving polymorphic alleles to fixation/extinction.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Explains why organisms tend to be well adapted to their way of life‬ ‭-‬ ‭Requires the genotypes differ in relative fitness‬ ‭-‬ ‭Non random process‬ ‭-‬ ‭Only act on loci that have at least two alleles segregating in the populations‬ ‭-‬ ‭A lower population size increases the rate at which one allele goes to fixation‬ ‭-‬ ‭(and all other alleles go extinct)‬ ‭-‬ ‭Smaller populations take quicker to become fixed or extinct, jags are more dramatic‬ ‭-‬ ‭Beneficial alleles will be lost‬ ‭-‬ ‭Genetic drift can cause the fixation of deleterious alleles‬ ‭-‬ ‭Lose so much variation that all individuals become susceptible to the same disease‬ ‭Life originated 4.5 Ga ago‬ ‭What resulted from the evolution of cyanobacteria?‬ ‭-‬ ‭An ozone (O‬‭3‭)‬ layer built up, making the invasion‬‭of land easier‬ ‭-‬ ‭High oxygen levels allowed the evolution of large, multicellular organisms with aerobic‬ ‭respiration (e.g., animals)‬ ‭-‬ ‭The chemical environment of Earth changed, plausibly making it harder for life to‬ ‭originate again‬ ‭.1.2. Associate smaller and larger populations with more or less pronounced genetic‬ 6 ‭drift, respectively.‬ ‭‬ I‭n smaller populations, genetic drift has a more pronounced effect‬‭because random‬ ‭sampling events can cause greater fluctuations in allele frequencies. In contrast, larger‬ ‭populations are less affected by genetic drift, as their larger gene pool dampens the‬ ‭impact of random fluctuations.‬ ‭.1. Changes in allele frequency, that is, evolution occur even without selection [genetic‬ 6 ‭drift]‬ ‭.1.1. Explain why fluctuations in allele frequency between generations are expected in‬ 6 ‭finite populations, even when alleles are neutral.‬ ‭‬ I‭n finite populations, allele frequencies fluctuate from one generation to the next due to‬ ‭chance events, such as random mating, random survival, or random fertilization. These‬ ‭fluctuations are expected because genetic drift, which is essentially the effect of‬ ‭ ampling error in finite populations, impacts allele frequencies even when alleles have‬ s ‭equal fitness.‬ ‭.1.3. Describe the role of genetic drift in removing genetic variation from populations,‬ 6 ‭especially small populations, and why this is a concern for conservation biologists.‬ ‭‬ G ‭ enetic drift removes genetic variation‬‭from populations‬‭by randomly leading to the‬ ‭fixation of some alleles and the extinction of others. This is particularly concerning in‬ ‭small populations, where genetic variation is lost more quickly,‬‭resulting in reduced‬ ‭genetic diversity‬‭, which makes populations more‬‭vulnerable‬‭to diseases and‬ ‭environmental changes.‬‭Conservation biologists worry‬‭about this loss of genetic‬ ‭variation because it can lead to‬‭inbreeding and reduced‬‭adaptability, increasing the‬ ‭risk of extinction.‬ ‭6.2. Genetic drift can reduce the efficacy of natural selection [genetic drift vs. selection]‬ ‭.2.1. Identify genetic drift and small population size as the cause of trajectories in which‬ 6 ‭beneficial alleles go extinct or deleterious alleles are fixed.‬ ‭‬ I‭n small populations, genetic drift can overpower natural selection,‬‭causing beneficial‬ ‭alleles to be lost and deleterious alleles to become fixed‬‭, simply due to chance. This‬ ‭occurs because the impact of random events on allele frequencies is stronger in small‬ ‭populations, reducing the ability of selection to act effectively.‬ ‭.2.2. Describe the role of genetic drift in lowering fitness and increasing the risk of‬ 6 ‭population extinction.‬ ‭‬ G ‭ enetic drift can lead to‬‭the fixation of deleterious‬‭alleles‬‭, resulting in a‬‭decline in the‬ ‭overall fitness of the population‬‭. This‬‭reduction‬‭in fitness‬‭can lead to decreased‬ ‭fertility, survival, and adaptability, increasing the risk of population extinction,‬‭especially‬ ‭in small populations.‬ ‭ daptive radiation is associated with periods of species accumulation and diversification‬ A ‭[adaptive radiation]‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Define adaptive radiation and associate it with the occupation of a new adaptive‬ ‭Zone‬ ‭-‬ ‭Adaptive radation occurs when a lineage undergoes a major transition that allows it to access‬ ‭Some ecological space that was previously inaccessible‬ ‭-‬ ‭Trainsiting to a new adaptive zone is rare because stabilzing selection will generally maintain‬ ‭Adaptions to the current adaptive zone, decrease fitness‬ ‭-‬ ‭The evolution of traits needed for a lineage to function in a dramatically new‬ ‭ecological niche (or "adaptive zone")‬‭:‬‭The traits‬‭probably evolved for a function in‬ ‭the current adaptive zone but could later be coopted for the necessary function‬ ‭in the new adaptive zone‬ ‭2. List examples of adaptive radiations, including eukaryotes and bilaterian animals‬ ‭ any phyla of bilaterian animals underwent an adaptive radiation in the early Cambrian‬ M ‭era (540- 485 Ma)‬ ‭3. Distinguish bilaterians, sponges, and cnidarians and provide examples of the former‬ ‭-‬ ‭Sponges area morphous without obvious symmetry, filter feeders and contain two‬ ‭Tissue layers‬ ‭-‬ ‭Cnidarians have three tissue layers, muscles, nerves, and radial symmetry‬ ‭-‬ ‭Bilaterians also have three tissue layers, muscles, nerves, bilateral symmetry‬ ‭4. Explain the role of rising atmospheric oxygen and an evolutionary arms race in‬ ‭explaining the explosion of bilaterian diversity in the Cambrian fossil record‬ ‭Multiple bilaterians invade land and a few lineages later reinvaded water.‬ ‭5. List at least three independent invasions of land‬ ‭-‬ ‭Plants‬ ‭-‬ ‭Insects (arthropods), mililpedes , centipedes, spiders and scorpions‬ ‭-‬ ‭tetrapod‬ ‭ here are three domains of life, united by common ancestry [universal common‬ T ‭ancestry]‬ I‭dentify bacteria and archaea as the two prokaryotic domains and summarize their‬ ‭ecological roles‬ ‭‬ B ‭ acteria‬‭are metabolically diverse, cycling elements‬‭such as nitrogen, sulfur, and‬ ‭phosphorus, and include organisms capable of photosynthesis and chemosynthesis.‬ ‭They can form mutualistic relationships (e.g., gut microbiota) or be pathogens.‬ ‭‬ ‭Archaea‬‭include Euryarchaea and TACK groups, known‬‭for thriving in extreme‬ ‭environments and having unique membrane lipids. They are metabolically diverse and‬ ‭include mutualists but rarely pathogens.‬ ‭List evidence in support of universal common ancestry‬ ‭‬ C ‭ ells‬‭: All cells have a lipid membrane, even though‬‭different materials like oil droplets‬ ‭could have served as the boundary.‬ ‭‬ ‭Metabolism‬‭: All cells share similar biochemical pathways,‬‭despite the potential for‬ ‭different routes to make the same compounds.‬ ‭‬ D ‭ NA and RNA‬‭: All cells use DNA and RNA with right-handed sugars and the same four‬ ‭nucleotides, despite the possible diversity of nucleic acids.‬ ‭‬ ‭Proteins‬‭: All cells use left-handed amino acids to make proteins, even though proteins‬ ‭could be composed of right- or left-handed amino acids.‬ ‭‬ ‭Translation‬‭: All cells use ribosomes for translation‬‭and have highly conserved RNA‬ ‭sequences in ribosomes.‬ ‭‬ ‭Genetic code‬‭: All cells use almost the same genetic‬‭code for translating mRNA into‬ ‭proteins, despite the huge number of possible codings.‬ ‭‬ ‭LUCA‬‭-‬‭last common ancestor of bacteria, archae, and‬‭eukarotes‬‭, oxygenic‬ ‭photosynthesis and aerobic respiration is not likely to be present in LUCA‬ ‭‬ ‭LUCA‬‭-‬‭Traits that are not obviously essential or‬‭optimal yet they are still shared by all‬ ‭cellular life‬ ‭‬ ‭LUCA‬‭- most likely present is ATP, DNA genome, prokarytoic‬‭cell, and ribosomes‬ ‭11.1.3‬‭Summarize current understanding of the time‬‭of origin of life on Earth‬ ‭‬ T ‭ he Earth formed‬‭4.54 billion years ago (Ga)‬‭. Evidence‬‭suggests that life existed as‬ ‭early as‬‭3.8 Ga‬‭and possibly by‬‭4.1 Ga‬‭, implying that‬‭life emerged soon after the‬ ‭presence of liquid water.‬ ‭ 1.2 Eukaryotic cells arose from prokaryotic ancestors just once‬ 1 ‭[eukaryotes]‬ ‭11.2.1‬‭List features that are present in all eukaryotes‬‭but are absent from prokaryotes‬ ‭‬ ‭ ucleus‬‭with a double membrane and‬‭genome‬‭inside.‬ N ‭‬ ‭Organelles‬‭such as‬‭endoplasmic reticulum‬‭,‬‭Golgi apparatus‬‭,‬‭and‬‭mitochondria‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭Complex‬‭endomembrane system‬‭and larger cell volume‬‭compared to prokaryotes.‬ ‭‬ ‭They both have plastids, ribosomes , prokaryotes don’t have‬‭endomembrane‬‭system‬ ‭ 1.2.2‬‭Draw the relationships of Bacteria, Euryarchaea,‬‭TACK archaea, and the eukaryotic‬ 1 ‭nucleus‬ ‭‬ E ‭ ukaryotes‬‭are more closely related to‬‭TACK archaea‬‭than to‬‭Euryarchaea‬‭or‬ ‭Bacteria‬‭. Eukaryotic mitochondria, however, are derived‬‭from‬‭alpha-proteobacteria‬‭.‬ ‭11.2.3‬‭Explain why the origin of eukaryotes was an‬‭important evolutionary event‬ ‭‬ T ‭ he origin of eukaryotes enabled‬‭greater cellular‬‭complexity‬‭and the evolution of‬ ‭multicellularity‬‭, allowing for a wider range of ecological‬‭roles and adaptation.‬ ‭ 1.3 Eukaryotes arose as a merger of a bacterial (mitochondria) and TACK archaeal‬ 1 ‭lineage [endosymbiosis]‬ ‭11.3.1‬‭List evidence that supports the endosymbiotic‬‭model‬ ‭‬ M ‭ itochondria‬‭have a‬‭circular genome‬‭like bacteria.‬ ‭‬ ‭Mitochondria and alpha-proteobacteria share‬‭similar ribosome structure‬‭and‬ ‭biochemical reactions‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭Mitochondria‬‭divide independently, indicating a cell-like‬‭origin.‬ ‭ 1.3.2 Draw the phylogenetic trees that would be expected under the endosymbiotic or‬ 1 ‭autogenous theories for the origin of mitochondria and plastids‬ ‭‬ I‭n the‬‭endosymbiotic theory‬‭, mitochondria are more‬‭closely related to‬ ‭alpha-proteobacteria‬‭than to the nuclear genome.‬ ‭‬ ‭In the‬‭autogenous theory‬‭, mitochondria are more closely‬‭related to the‬‭eukaryotic‬ ‭nucleus‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭Phylogenetic‬‭analysis‬‭can be used to test the‬‭endosymbiotic‬‭theory‬‭for the origin of‬ ‭mitochondria or plastids‬ ‭‬ ‭Phylogenetic species‬‭focus on the degree of relatedness‬ ‭‬ ‭Biological species‬‭focus on the ability to interbreed‬ ‭ 1.4 There are two models for the origin of the nucleus and endomembrane‬ 1 ‭system [topological models]‬ ‭11.4.1‬‭Summarize differences between the outside-in‬‭and inside-out models‬ ‭‬ O ‭ utside-in model‬‭: The‬‭cell membrane folds inward‬‭,‬‭forming internal vesicles, the‬ ‭nucleus, and the endomembrane system,‬‭internalization‬‭of‬‭the‬‭plasma‬‭membrane‬ ‭‬ ‭Inside-out model‬‭: The‬‭original‬‭cell‬‭body pushes‬‭membranes‬‭outward‬‭, fusing to‬ ‭create the‬‭cytoplasm‬‭and internal compartments, with‬‭mitochondria originally external.‬ ‭‬ ‭Phylogentic analysis‬‭cannot be used to distinigish‬‭the inside-out and outside-in models‬ ‭because both models are‬‭autogenous‬‭and posit that‬‭the nucleus is derived from an‬ ‭archaeal‬‭ancestor‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭Membranes don't have genomes, so there is no way to use‬‭phylogenetic analysis‬‭to‬ ‭tell if the nuclear membrane came from the plasma membrane or vice versa‬ ‭ 1.4.2‬‭Explain why the recent characterization of‬‭Asgard archaea supports the inside-out‬ 1 ‭model‬ ‭‬ A ‭ sgardarchaeota‬‭(e.g.,‬‭Lokiarchaeota‬‭) produce‬‭extracellular‬‭protrusions‬‭and‬ ‭interact‬‭closely‬‭with‬‭ectosymbiotic‬‭prokaryotes‬‭, supporting‬‭the idea of membrane‬ ‭extension outward, consistent with the‬‭inside-out‬‭model‬ ‭‬ ‭Closet relatives of eukaryotes so far discovered‬ ‭Oxygenic‬‭photosynthesis‬‭- H2O is the electron donor‬ ‭-‬ ‭oxygen gas is produced as a byproduct‬ ‭-‬ ‭ change to the atmosphere that allowed for the evolution of large aerobically repairing‬ A ‭species such as eukaryotes‬ ‭-‬ ‭the‬‭rusting‬‭of the oceans as dissolved Fe(II) was oxided into reddish Fe(III)‬ ‭-‬ ‭The‬‭accumulation of ozone‬‭which shielded the earth‬‭from ultraviolet light and heped‬ ‭make land more easily colonized‬ ‭-‬ ‭Cyanobacteria‬‭convert carbon dioxide and water into‬‭carbohydrates and oxygen using‬ ‭light energy‬ ‭ noxygenic‬‭photosynthesis‬‭- H2S is the electron donor‬ A ‭13.1 Humans are a lineage of primates [Hominid relationships]‬ ‭13.1.1 Identify primate traits that are adaptations for arboreality and frugivory‬ ‭‬ A ‭ rboreality (tree-dwelling)‬‭: Primates have‬‭binocular‬‭vision‬‭,‬‭flexible shoulder joints‬‭,‬ ‭and‬‭grasping hands‬‭with opposable thumbs, all of which‬‭help in navigating through‬ ‭trees.‬ ‭‬ ‭Frugivory (fruit-eating)‬‭: Primates have‬‭color vision‬‭to identify ripe fruit and‬‭dextrous‬ ‭hands‬‭to grasp and manipulate fruit.‬ ‭‬ ‭Last common ancestor of living primates adapted through‬‭living in forests and‬ ‭climbing trees‬ ‭ 3.1.2 Summarize the relationships between humans and the other apes (chimps, gorilla,‬ 1 ‭orangutans, and gibbons)‬ ‭‬ H ‭ umans are part of the‬‭great ape clade‬‭and are most‬‭closely related to‬‭chimpanzees‬ ‭and‬‭bonobos‬‭, with the last common ancestor diverging‬‭around‬‭7 million years ago‬‭.‬ ‭Other great apes include‬‭gorillas‬‭and‬‭orangutans‬‭,‬‭while‬‭gibbons‬‭are in a sister clade‬ ‭of the great apes.‬ ‭ 3.2 Humans evolved many differences from other great apes in the last 6 million years‬ 1 ‭[Hominin evolution]‬ ‭ 3.2.1 List important morphological and behavioral differences between humans and‬ 1 ‭other primates, including bipedality, cooking, hair loss, language, meat eating, opposable‬ ‭thumb, overarm throwing‬ ‭‬ ‭ ipedality‬‭: Humans are fully bipedal, walking on two‬‭legs.‬ B ‭‬ ‭Cooking‬‭: Humans cook food, which influences diet and‬‭digestion.‬ ‭‬ ‭Hair loss‬‭: Humans have significantly less body hair‬‭compared to other great apes.‬ ‭‬ ‭Language‬‭: Humans have complex language, allowing abstract‬‭communication.‬ ‭‬ ‭Meat eating‬‭: Humans have adapted to a diet that includes‬‭a significant amount of meat.‬ ‭‬ ‭Opposable thumb‬‭: Humans have a‬‭fully opposable thumb‬‭that allows precise tool use‬ ‭and manipulation.‬ ‭‬ O ‭ verarm throwing‬‭: Humans can throw with remarkable speed and accuracy, a key trait‬ ‭in hunting.‬ ‭‬ ‭Humans‬‭have knees that lock in extension, a twisted upper arm, bipedality than‬‭great‬ ‭apes‬ ‭‬ ‭They both share‬‭making nocturnal shelters, living‬‭in complex social groups and making‬ ‭tools‬ ‭‬ ‭Adaptations in humans (improving environment)‬‭;Increased‬‭sweat glands for better‬ ‭cooling on the open savanna‬ ‭‬ ‭Exaptations in humans (‬‭not originally intended)‬‭;‬‭binocular‬‭vision‬‭which allows us‬ ‭to judge distance when throwing projectiles, a‬‭grasping‬‭hand‬‭that can hold a spear or‬ ‭stone tool, a‬‭flexbile shoulder joint‬‭that allows‬‭efficient throwing , the flexible shoulder‬ ‭joint originally evolved for a‬‭different purpose‬‭,‬‭such as‬‭locomotion‬‭(e.g., swinging from‬ ‭branches) and was‬‭later co-opted‬‭for throwing‬ ‭‬ ‭Traits evolved in the ancestry of humans from oldest to youngest‬‭: flexible shoulder‬ ‭joints, bipdealism and then tools‬ ‭ 3.2.2 Explain the purported roles of long-distance running and collective hunting in‬ 1 ‭language and cooperation in modern humans‬ ‭‬ L ‭ ong-distance running‬‭: Humans evolved traits like‬‭sweat glands‬‭,‬‭long legs‬‭, and‬ ‭locked knees‬‭for endurance running, allowing them‬‭to chase prey over long distances in‬ ‭the heat., humans can utrun any other animal over a marathon‬ ‭‬ ‭Collective hunting‬‭: Hunting in groups fostered the‬‭need for‬‭cooperation‬‭and‬‭language‬ ‭to communicate and strategize, further enhancing group success and social cohesion.‬ ‭‬ ‭Scavenger hypothesis :‬‭the hominins started by scavenging‬‭kills from other predators‬ ‭and later transitioned to active hunting‬ ‭ 3.3 Anatomically modern humans emerged in Africa about 200,000 years ago and‬ 1 ‭spread around the world [Modern humans]‬ ‭ 3.3.1 Summarize the distribution of genetic variation among human populations and its‬ 1 ‭relation to geography‬ ‭‬ H ‭ uman populations are‬‭genetically homogenous‬‭due to‬‭frequent‬‭gene flow‬‭and the‬ ‭short time span (about‬‭200,000 years‬‭) since their‬‭origin. However,‬‭allelic variation‬ ‭decreases‬‭with distance from Africa, reflecting successive‬‭genetic bottlenecks‬‭during‬ ‭human migration out of Africa. Traits such as‬‭skin‬‭pigmentation‬‭have regional‬ ‭adaptations based on‬‭Vitamin D‬‭availability, but there‬‭are‬‭no biological races‬‭in‬ ‭humans.‬ ‭‬ ‭Humans migrate out of Africa 100 Ka years ago‬ ‭‬ ‭Human language :‬‭requires neural processing so that‬‭selection for language also‬ ‭selects for great brain size, allows groups to plan coordinated actions such as when‬ ‭hunting, it is possible to connect concepts together in new ways , coopted to plan ahead‬ ‭and solve complex problems‬ ‭‬ W ‭ hen anatomically modern humans moved out of Africa and into Eurasia, they‬ ‭interacted with‬‭Neanderthals‬‭and‬‭Denisovans‬‭—two groups‬‭of archaic humans whose‬ ‭ancestors had migrated out of Africa much earlier. During these interactions, there was‬ ‭some‬‭interbreeding‬‭between modern humans and these archaic populations, which‬ ‭resulted in‬‭a small percentage of Neanderthal and‬‭Denisovan DNA‬‭being present in‬ ‭the genomes of many modern human populations outside of Africa today. However,‬ ‭modern humans eventually‬‭outcompeted these archaic‬‭humans‬‭, leading to their‬ ‭extinction.‬ ‭10.1 The nature of species is controversial [species concepts]‬ ‭ 0.1.1. Distinguish the problem of determining is a group is a valid taxon from determining whether‬ 1 ‭It is at the species rank‬ ‭Determining if a group is a valid taxon involves classifying organisms based on similarities and shared‬ ‭characteristics, which could place them at various taxonomic ranks (e.g., genus, family, or species).‬ ‭Determining if it is at the species rank requires identifying‬‭whether the lineage is sufficiently distinct‬ ‭from others to warrant a separate species designation‬‭,‬‭typically done through biological or phylogenetic‬ ‭criteria. The‬‭Biological Species Concept‬‭views species‬‭as‬‭groups of interbreeding organisms‬‭,‬ ‭while the‬‭Phylogenetic Species Concept‬‭views species‬‭as‬‭clades (monophyletic groups)‬‭.‬ ‭ 0.1.2. Explain key differences between biological and phylogenetic species concepts.‬ 1 ‭The‬‭Biological Species Concept‬‭defines species based‬‭on‬‭the ability of their members to reproduce‬ ‭with one another and to be unable to reproduce with members of other species‬‭. It focuses on‬ ‭reproductive isolation. The‬‭Phylogenetic Species Concept‬‭,‬‭on the other hand, defines species as‬ ‭clades (monophyletic groups)‬‭and emphasizes‬‭genetic‬‭differences that make a lineage distinct‬ ‭for practical reasons rather than focusing on reproductive isolation alone.‬ ‭10.2 Species may contain discrete races/varieties [subspecific variation]‬ ‭ 0.2.1. Recognize cases where species can or cannot be divided into races/varieties.‬ 1 ‭Species can be divided into‬‭races/varieties‬‭when there‬‭is‬‭genetically discrete variation‬‭that is‬ ‭sufficiently distinct to justify recognition, such as in‬‭black bears (Ursus americanus)‬‭, which are divided‬ ‭into‬‭12 subspecies‬‭based on‬‭genetic differentiation‬‭.‬‭When genetic differences are not significant‬ ‭or are clinal rather than discrete, races/varieties are not recognized. For example,‬‭humans do not‬ ‭have genetic races‬‭because their genetic variation‬‭is‬‭clinal‬‭and not discrete.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Geographic and genetic distance‬‭correlate/the same because the more distant populations are,‬ ‭the lower the rate of exchanging genes‬ ‭ 0.2.2. Explain why humans lack genetic races/varieties.‬ 1 ‭Humans lack genetic races because they are‬‭a genetically‬‭homogenous species‬‭with‬‭no‬ ‭clear geographic breaks in genetic variation‬‭. The‬‭genetic differences in humans are‬‭clinal‬ ‭rather than discrete‬‭, with only about‬‭7% of genetic‬‭variation being structured‬ ‭geographically‬‭, while‬‭~93% of genetic variation is‬‭shared among all populations‬‭.‬ ‭ herefore,‬‭there are no sufficiently distinct local populations‬‭to justify the recognition of‬ T ‭biological races.‬ ‭-‬ ‭Human species‬‭are not subdivided into biological races because the amount of genetic‬ ‭differentiations between human populations is relatively low, and genetic diversity in‬ ‭humans is clinical rather than organized into discrete‬ ‭-‬ ‭biological species‬‭can‬‭be divided into subgroups if‬‭there is enough genetic‬ ‭differentiation, as is seen in many other animal species.‬ ‭ 0.3. The splitting of an ancestral lineage into independently evolving descendant‬ 1 ‭lineages can occur without prior geographic isolation [speciation]‬ ‭ 0.3.1. Distinguish allopatric from sympatric speciation‬ 1 ‭Allopatric speciation‬‭occurs due to‬‭geographic isolation‬‭,‬‭where populations become‬ ‭separated and evolve independently until they become distinct species. This process can‬ ‭happen through‬‭dispersal to an isolated location‬‭or‬‭environmental changes‬‭such as‬ ‭climate change or shifting water levels.‬‭The splitting‬‭of the ancestral population into geographically‬ ‭Isolated regions prevent them from exchanging genes.‬ ‭In contrast,‬‭sympatric speciation‬ ‭Occurs‬‭without geographic separation‬‭but involves‬‭strong disruptive selection and‬ ‭assortative mating (consistent)‬‭, where individuals preferentially mate with others‬ ‭of similar trait values.‬ ‭(most common way that sister species come to be unable to interbreed)‬ ‭-‬ ‭Factors that cause divergence from members of species that are isolated‬‭; natural selection‬ ‭occurring in different environments, genetic drift acting on pre-existing variation and new mutations‬ ‭ 0.3.3 Describe how disruptive selection and assortative mating can, potentially, lead to‬ 1 ‭the evolution of assortative mating, and why this is needed for speciation to occur‬ ‭Disruptive selection‬‭favors extreme trait values over‬‭intermediate ones, while‬ ‭assortative mating‬‭means that individuals preferentially‬‭mate with others who share‬ ‭similar traits (e.g.,‬‭long-legged spiders preferentially‬‭mating with other long-legged‬ ‭individuals‬‭). In‬‭sympatric speciation‬‭,‬‭both disruptive‬‭selection and assortative‬ ‭mating‬‭are needed for the population to split into‬‭separate breeding groups,‬ ‭which can then diverge over time and become different species.‬ ‭Fst‬ ‭-‬ ‭A Measure of genetic differentiation between populations‬ ‭Reproductive isolation‬ ‭-‬ ‭Not evolve within a single population‬ ‭-‬ ‭Individuals that cannot mate with other members of their populations generally have‬ ‭lower fitness‬ ‭ hanges in trait function contributed to the evolution of some complex phenotypes‬ C ‭[exaptation]‬ ‭.1.1. Distinguish adaptation from exaptations based on whether the current function of a‬ 9 ‭trait is that for which it originally evolved.‬ ‭‬ A ‭ n‬‭adaptation‬‭is a trait that evolved specifically for its‬‭current function‬‭, while an‬ ‭exaptation‬‭is a‬‭trait that evolved for one function‬‭and later became important for a‬ ‭different function‬‭. For example,‬‭feathers‬‭originally‬‭evolved for‬‭thermoregulation‬‭but‬ ‭were later‬‭coopted‬‭for‬‭flight‬‭, making them an exaptation.‬ ‭.2 Sexual selection can favor traits that lower survivorship but increase reproductive‬ 9 ‭success [sexual selection]‬ ‭.2.1. Recognize examples of secondary sexual characteristics as being the result of‬ 9 ‭sexual selection.‬ ‭‬ E ‭ xamples of‬‭secondary sexual characteristics‬‭that‬‭result from‬‭sexual selection‬ ‭include the‬‭male peacock's large and colorful tail‬‭,‬‭the‬‭showy colors of a male‬ ‭mandrill‬‭, and the‬‭horns of a rhinoceros beetle‬‭. These‬‭traits evolve because they‬ ‭increase reproductive success‬‭, even if they decrease‬‭survivorship‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭Sexually dimorphic :‬‭no differences, both species‬‭look the same‬ ‭‬ ‭Monogamy :‬‭males and females share similar roles,‬‭male mates with one female ,‬ ‭minimal or no visible differences‬ ‭‬ ‭Polygamous :‬‭one male mates with many females, males‬‭have higher variance in‬ ‭reproductive success, some males leave very many offspring, but most dont lives any‬ ‭offspring ,‬‭resulting in sexual dimorphism , males‬‭and females usually have distinct‬ ‭physical differences because males compete with each other for mating‬ ‭opportunities.‬ ‭.2.2. Explain why exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics mainly evolve when‬ 9 ‭there is a high variance in reproductive output, which is more commonly seen in males.‬ ‭‬ E ‭ xaggerated secondary sexual characteristics‬‭mainly‬‭evolve in species with‬‭high‬ ‭variance in reproductive output‬‭, especially in‬‭polygamous species‬‭. In such species,‬ ‭one male mates with many females‬‭, while others do not reproduce at all. This‬‭high‬ ‭variance‬‭means that any trait that helps a male successfully‬‭compete for mates‬‭has a‬ ‭large payoff, even if it‬‭reduces survivorship‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭Because males often differ greatly in mating success,‬‭selection more strongly favors‬ ‭traits that improve mating success (even if they lower survival).‬ ‭.3 Natural selection can act when traits affect fitness of units above the individual‬ 9 ‭[group selection]‬ ‭.3.1. Explain why individual level selection cannot explain the evolution of cooperation‬ 9 ‭or altruism.‬ ‭‬ I‭ndividual-level selection‬‭cannot explain‬‭cooperation or altruism‬‭because these‬ ‭behaviors‬‭reduce individual fitness‬‭while increasing‬‭the‬‭fitness of others‬‭.‬‭Altruistic‬ ‭traits‬‭would be‬‭selected against‬‭if natural selection acted only at the individual level, as‬ ‭they would lower the individual's chances of survival and reproduction.‬ ‭.3.2. Associate group selection with cases where the genetic composition of groups‬ 9 ‭affects group fitness.‬ ‭‬ G ‭ roup selection‬‭occurs when‬‭groups with more altruists‬‭have disproportionately‬ ‭higher reproductive output‬‭compared to groups with‬‭fewer altruists. This mechanism‬ ‭can lead to the‬‭evolution of altruistic traits‬‭even‬‭if such traits lower individual fitness.‬ ‭The‬‭group composition‬‭—with a higher proportion of‬‭altruists—improves the overall‬ ‭fitness of the group‬‭, thereby increasing the prevalence‬‭of altruism.‬ ‭.1 Heritability describes the extent to which variation in a continuous trait has a genetic‬ 8 ‭basis [heritability]‬ ‭.1.1. Explain how additive effects over many polymorphic loci can yield a bell-shaped‬ 8 ‭distribution of trait variation.‬ ‭‬ C ‭ ontinuous traits, such as‬‭height‬‭, are controlled‬‭by‬‭multiple alleles‬‭across‬‭many loci‬ ‭in the genome. The‬‭interaction of alleles at different‬‭loci‬‭can combine in many ways,‬ ‭resulting in a‬‭bell-shaped distribution‬‭of trait values.‬‭Individuals with‬‭extreme values‬ ‭have either all "tall" or all "short" alleles, while‬‭medium trait values‬‭result from having‬‭a‬ ‭mix of tall and short alleles‬‭.‬ ‭.1.2. Define heritability (h²) as the fraction of phenotypic variation in a population that is‬ 8 ‭predictable given parental trait values.‬ ‭‬ H ‭ eritability (h²)‬‭is defined as the‬‭fraction of the‬‭variation in a population that can be‬ ‭explained by genetics‬‭. It indicates how well‬‭an offspring’s‬‭traits can be predicted‬ ‭given the traits of its parents‬‭.‬ ‭.1.3. Describe how h² helps predict the degree to which a trait value responds to‬ 8 ‭directional selection.‬ ‭‬ H ‭ eritability (h²)‬‭, along with the‬‭strength of selection (s)‬‭, is used to calculate the‬ ‭response to selection (r)‬‭, using the equation‬‭r = h² * s‬‭. This helps predict‬‭how much‬ ‭the mean trait value‬‭in the population will change after one generation of‬‭directional‬ ‭selection‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭Directional selection mean will increase, standard deviation will decrease‬ ‭‬ ‭Stablizing selection mean will increase‬ ‭8.2 Eugenics has scientific and ethical flaws [eugenics]‬ ‭.2.1. Describe how correlations between parental and offspring environments can result‬ 8 ‭in an overestimation of heritability.‬ ‭‬ I‭n humans, the‬‭social environments‬‭of parents and offspring are often correlated (e.g.,‬ ‭children growing up in poverty are likely to have parents who also grew up in poverty).‬ ‭This correlation results in an‬‭overestimation of heritability‬‭when trying to determine if‬ ‭traits like‬‭criminality or educational attainment‬‭are inherited.‬ ‭‬ ‭Eugenicists‬‭over estimated the heritabltiy of human traits. They failed to account for the‬ ‭fact that parents and offspring typically‬‭grow up in relatively similar environments‬ ‭8.2.2. Explain how purely environmental factors can change human social traits.‬ ‭‬ E ‭ nvironmental factors‬‭, such as‬‭nutrition‬‭or‬‭social‬‭upbringing‬‭, can have significant‬ ‭effects on human social traits. For example, improving‬‭nutritional practices‬‭can‬ ‭increase average height‬‭over time, and a supportive‬‭social environment can lead to‬ ‭better‬‭educational outcomes‬‭.‬ ‭.3 Selection can act not only on the mean but on the variance of a continuous trait‬ 8 ‭[stabilizing and disruptive selection]‬ ‭.3.1. Distinguish stabilizing and disruptive selection based on the relative fitness of‬ 8 ‭different trait values and predict their results.‬ ‭‬ S ‭ tabilizing selection‬‭favors trait values‬‭towards‬‭the center‬‭of the distribution,‬ ‭disfavoring extreme values‬‭, and leading to‬‭reduced variance‬‭. For example,‬‭babies‬ ‭with moderate birth weights‬‭have higher survival rates than those with very low or very‬ ‭high birth weights.‬ ‭‬ ‭Disruptive selection‬‭, on the other hand,‬‭favors extreme‬‭trait values‬‭at both ends of‬ ‭the distribution, leading to‬‭increased variance‬‭. An‬‭example would be a‬‭bird population‬ ‭in which‬‭both large and small beaks‬‭are advantageous‬‭for different food sources, while‬ ‭medium-sized beaks‬‭are less effective.‬ ‭.1 The frequency of genetic disorders is based on a balance between the rate of‬ 7 ‭mutation and the strength of negative selection [mutation-selection balance]‬ ‭.1.1. Identify a higher mutation rate and milder symptoms as factors increasing disease‬ 7 ‭prevalence.‬ ‭‬ A ‭ higher mutation rate leads to more deleterious alleles‬‭arising in a population.‬ ‭Additionally,‬‭genetic disorders‬‭with‬‭milder symptoms‬‭,‬‭such as‬‭familial‬ ‭hypercholesterolemia‬‭, are‬‭less strongly selected against‬‭,‬‭allowing those alleles to‬ ‭persist at higher frequencies in the population.‬ ‭.1.2. Explain why alleles causing recessive disorders are at a higher frequency than‬ 7 ‭dominant alleles.‬ ‭‬ R ‭ ecessive alleles tend to be at higher frequencies‬‭because they‬‭only cause‬ ‭disease in homozygous individuals‬‭, which are relatively‬‭rare when the allele‬ ‭frequency is low.‬‭Heterozygotes‬‭do not exhibit symptoms,‬‭which allows the allele to‬ ‭increase in frequency‬‭without being strongly selected against.‬‭Dominant alleles‬‭, on‬ ‭the other hand,‬‭cause disease in heterozygotes‬‭and thus are‬‭selected against‬ ‭immediately‬‭when they arise,‬‭keeping their frequency‬‭low.‬ ‭.2 Genetic disorders vary in frequency among populations, especially small, inbred‬ 7 ‭populations [inbreeding]‬ ‭7.2.1. Identify genetic drift as the cause of variation among populations.‬ ‭‬ G ‭ enetic drift‬‭is responsible for‬‭variation in genetic disorder frequencies among‬ ‭different populations, particularly in small or inbred populations‬‭.‬‭In such‬ ‭populations,‬‭random chance‬‭can lead to certain deleterious alleles being present at‬ ‭higher frequencies‬‭than expected, as seen in‬‭ethnic groups‬‭like the‬‭Ashkenazi Jews‬ ‭and‬‭Old Order Amish‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭recessive disease allele might be found at higher frequency in an inbreeding population‬ ‭than would be expected under mutation-selection balance, Because inbreeding‬ ‭populations are small, genetic drift can result in a deleterious allele attaining a‬ ‭higher-than-expected frequency by chance.‬ ‭.3 Over-dominant selection tends to maintain polymorphisms in a population [balanced‬ 7 ‭polymorphism]‬ ‭.3.1. Determine whether over-dominant selection is occurring based on the relative‬ 7 ‭fitness of the three genotypes.‬ ‭‬ O ‭ ver-dominant selection‬‭occurs when the‬‭heterozygote‬‭genotype‬‭has a‬‭higher‬ ‭fitness‬‭than either‬‭homozygote genotype‬‭. For example,‬‭in populations with high‬ ‭malaria infection rates, the‬‭AS heterozygotes‬‭for‬‭the‬‭sickle-cell allele‬‭have‬‭higher‬ ‭fitness‬‭compared to‬‭AA or SS homozygotes‬‭, providing‬‭resistance to malaria‬‭without‬ ‭the severe anemia associated with sickle-cell disease.‬ ‭.3.2. Explain why over-dominant selection tends to prevent either allele from going to‬ 7 ‭fixation.‬ ‭‬ I‭n‬‭over-dominant selection‬‭, the‬‭rarer allele‬‭tends‬‭to‬‭increase in frequency‬‭because‬ ‭heterozygotes have the highest fitness‬‭. This process‬‭leads to a‬‭balanced‬ ‭polymorphism‬‭where‬‭both alleles are maintained‬‭at‬‭an intermediate frequency,‬ ‭preventing either allele from‬‭going to fixation‬‭.‬

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser