What common mistake do advocates make when relying on analogies?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the common mistakes that advocates make when using analogies in their arguments. It outlines various potential mistakes and expects an identification of the most common one.
Answer
They connect unrelated cases to support their arguments.
Advocates often connect unrelated cases to support their arguments.
Answer for screen readers
Advocates often connect unrelated cases to support their arguments.
More Information
Using analogies in legal arguments can be useful, but they can also lead to misleading conclusions when advocates stretch comparisons too far or use irrelevant cases.
Tips
To avoid this mistake, advocates should carefully evaluate the relevance and similarities between the cases they are comparing.
Sources
- Understanding and Improving Analogies in Legal Argument - scholarship.law.marquette.edu
- Criticisms & Defenses of Reasoning by Analogy in Law - cyber.harvard.edu
- Flawed Analogies - developsense.com
Thank you for voting!
