In the Burke v John Paul & Co case, what was the defendant's argument regarding foreseeability?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the specific argument made by the defendant in the case of Burke v John Paul & Co, focusing on the aspect of foreseeability related to the injury claimed by the plaintiff.
Answer
The defendants argued that the incident was not foreseeable.
The defendants argued that the incident was not foreseeable and therefore they could not be held liable.
Answer for screen readers
The defendants argued that the incident was not foreseeable and therefore they could not be held liable.
More Information
In Burke v John Paul & Co, the defendants contended that they could not have foreseen the specific incident occurring, thus challenging the claim of negligence due to lack of foreseeability.
Sources
- Reasonable Foreseeability Under Law of Tort and Negligence - lawschoolguide.blogspot.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
Thank you for voting!
