Law: Civil vs. Common, Criminal vs. Civil

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Listen to an AI-generated conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

Match the legal terms with their correct definitions:

Stare Decisis = Precedent controls; courts abide by prior rulings. Incorporation = Applying the Bill of Rights to the individual states. Prior Restraint = Restraining speech before it is uttered or written. State Action Doctrine = The Constitution only applies against the government.

Match the types of legal cases with their corresponding descriptions:

Civil Case = Two parties suing each other, typically for damages or specific actions. Criminal Case = The government versus an individual, potentially leading to jail or fines. Law Case = May result in award of money. Equity Case = May result in an injunction.

Match the legal concepts related to intentional emotional distress with their elements:

Intentional Act = The act must be intentional. Extreme Act = The act must be extreme in nature. Outrageous Act = The act must be outrageous in nature. Severe Emotional Distress = Leads the plaintiff to experience severe emotional distress.

Match the elements of the Brandenburg Test for incitement with their descriptions:

<p>Advocates imminent lawless action = The speech or expression must advocate for imminent lawless action. Threatened action poses serious risk of harm = The action poses a serious risk of harm. Speaker intends lawless action = The speaker specifically intends for lawless action to occur. Illegal action likely to occur = The illegal action is likely to occur.</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the elements of defamation with their correct components:

<p>Defamatory Statement = A statement that harms someone's reputation. Of and concerning Plaintiff = The statement must be about the plaintiff. Publication = The statement must be communicated to a third party. Falsity = The statement must be false.</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the legal concepts related to speech regulation in schools with their descriptions:

<p>Tinker Test = Speech can only be banned if it disrupts the educational process. Hazelwood Test = Legitimate pedagogical concerns; only applies if the school newspaper is essentially a graded class. Hosty Case = If its a traditional public forum, CNN Channels, if not, apply Hazelwood standard: Is this a class or an extracurricular activity? Is the censorship necessary for legitimate pedagogical concern? California's anti-Hazelwood statue = Bans the prior restraint of articles in public school papers unless the content is obscene Libelous or slanderous or would cause substantial disruption of the orderly operation of the school (i.e., the tinker standard);</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the legal terms concerning defamation cases involving different types of figures:

<p>Public Figure = Must prove malice to collect compensatory/punitive damages in a defamation case. Private Figure, Public Issue = Must prove negligence to collect compensatory damages; prove malice to collect punitive damages. Private Figure, Private Issue = Use state common law to figure out burden of proof in a defamation case. Malice = Intentional/ reckless disregard for the truth.</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the terms associated with lawsuits aimed at curbing public participation with their descriptions:

<p>SLAPP Statute = Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation; lawsuits to prevent the defendant from publishing further harmful material. Anti-SLAPP Statute = Statutes where the defendant asks the judge to dismiss the plaintiff's lawsuit outright. Libel Tourism = Going to Britain to sue in British courts because it would be too hard to win in the U.S. Communications Decency Act = Protected content providers from liability for false statements in books that they sell.</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the U.S. constitutional amendments with their significance regarding individual states and rights:

<p>First Amendment = Originally only applied to Congress, restricting federal abridgment of speech. Fourteenth Amendment = Due Process Clause applied guarantees of freedom of speech and press to the states. 1833 Supreme Court Ruling = The First Amendment and the entire Bill of Rights did not apply to the States. Gitlow v. New York = The Supreme Court held that, under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the guarantees of freedom of speech and freedom of the press apply to the States, as well as the federal government.</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the legal terms related to speech regulations with their descriptions:

<p>Prior Restaurant = A law that restrains speech before it is uttered/ written. Symbolic Speech = Actor: person engaging in the conduct must intend to convey a particular message with this conduct. Audience for Symbolic Speech = Audience: There must be a great likelihood that some people who witness it will reasonably understand the particular message that was intended by the actor. State Action Doctrine = Constitution applies against the GOVERNMENT.</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the historical actions with the act under the Sedition Act of 1918:

<p>Prohibited Actions = Crime utter or print or write or publish disloyal or profane language intended to cause contempt for, or scorn, the federal government, the constitution, the flag, or the armed forces. Penalty = The penalty for violating it was $10,000 or jail up to 20 years. 2011 Application = The Sedition Act was used against Julian Assange from Wikileaks, for disclosing hundreds of thousands of classified government documents on the Internet. Post Office Involvement = During World War I, the post office censored thousands of newspapers, books,and pamphlets.</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the facts with the Morse v. Federick case:

<p>Facts = Facts</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of case with the damages that are available:

<p>Torts Cases = Compensatory and punitive damages Breach of contract cases = Only compensatory damages defamation cause = Must prove malice (intentional/ reckless disregard for the truth) in order to collect compensatory/punitive damages private figure cause = must prove negligence to collect compensatory damages; must prove malice to collect punitive damages</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the 3 types of cases to determine what a plainitiff needs to show:

<p>plaintiff is a public official or public figure = Malice for both compensatory and punitive damages In a defamation case, what must the plaintiff prove if he or she is a private figure in a matter of public concern = Negligence for compensatory damages; malice for punitive damages In a defamation case, what must the plaintiff prove if he or she is a private figure in a matter of strictly private concern? = Refer to the State's own laws; the U.S. Constitution does not get involved here. refer to state laws = The State's own laws; the U.S. Constitution does not get involved here.</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Match the alcohol rulings court cases

<p>Pitt News v. Pappert (Third Circuit) = PA's Act 199-which prohibited alcohol advertising in college newspapers(as a way to curb underage alcohol drinking and also to prevent binge alcohol drinking) violated the first Amendment right of the newspaper to receive advertising revenue Educational Media Co. at VA Tech v. Swecker, the fourth circuit = the fourth circuit said it is counterintuitive for alcohol vendors to spend their money on advertisements in newspapers with relatively limited circulation, directed primarily at college students, if they believed that these ads would not increase demand by college students. 3rd circuit says... = 3rd circuit! 4th circuit says = 4th circuit!</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Civil Law vs. Common Law

Civil law originates from Europe, while common law comes from England. Civil law aims to cover everything, whereas common law has intentionally vague laws.

Law system in California

California follows common law, with the exception of marital property, which adheres to the civil law system of COMMUNITY PROPERTY.

Civil vs. Criminal Case

A criminal case involves the government versus an individual, potentially leading to jail, fines, or execution. A civil case involves two parties suing each other, where the outcome is generally damages or injunctions.

Application of the Bill of Rights to States

The First Amendment originally restricted Congress, not the states. The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause later applied these guarantees to the states.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Incorporation (Bill of Rights)

Incorporation is the legal doctrine by which the Bill of Rights is applied to individual states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Law vs. Equity Awards

Law cases typically award money, while equity cases often grant an injunction to stop or compel certain actions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is a regulation?

A regulation is an interpretation of the law by an agency enforcing that law. Laws control over regulations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Stare Decisis

Stare decisis means precedent controls; courts abide by prior rulings from higher or equal courts unless the case is distinguishable

Signup and view all the flashcards

Impact of the Printing Press on Speech

The printing press made speech regulation more pressing because it enabled rapid, widespread distribution of written material.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Colonial Resistance to Restraint

Prior restraint laws were less successful in American colonies due to distance and jury nullification.

Signup and view all the flashcards

State Action Doctrine

The State Action Doctrine says the Constitution only applies against the government, except for the Thirteenth Amendment which prohibits slavery.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Prior restraint law

A law that restrains speech before it is uttered or written.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Requirements for Symbolic Speech

Symbolic speech requires intent to convey a particular message and a great likelihood that the message will be understood by witnesses.

Signup and view all the flashcards

1917 Espionage Act

Besides espionage, the 1917 Espionage Act prohibited dissent and opposition to the war, with penalties up to $10,000 and/or 20 years in jail.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The 1918 Sedition Act

The 1918 Sedition Act prohibited disloyal or profane language against the government, the constitution, the flag, or the armed forces.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Library Book Removal Rule

Libraries can't remove books just for disliking the viewpoint, they can remove it based on factual inaccuracies.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Elements of Intentional Emotional Distress

Intentional, Extreme, and Outrageous Acts that cause the plaintiff to experience Severe Emotional Distress.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Brandenburg Test Elements

The Brandenburg Test requires imminent lawless action, threatened action, speaker intends the action, and the illegal act is likely to occurr.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Elements of Defamation

defamatory statement, of and concerning the plaintiff, publication, falsity, scienter, and actual damages

Signup and view all the flashcards

Constitutional law for speech in public schools

Tinker Test: Speech can only be banned if it disrupts the educational process

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Civil Law vs. Common Law

  • Civil law is prevalent in Europe and countries without English roots.
  • Common law is used in England and its former colonies like the US federal government.
  • Civil law aims to cover all aspects, whereas common law uses vague laws to allow for court and regulatory interpretation.
  • California operates under common law, except for marital property, which follows civil law's community property principles.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

  • A criminal case involves the government against an individual.
  • A civil case involves two parties suing each other.
  • Criminal cases could lead to imprisonment, fines, or execution.
  • Civil cases generally lead to financial damages or court orders to stop certain actions.

First Amendment and the States

  • In 1833, the Supreme Court decided that the Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment, did not apply to the states.
  • The First Amendment restricts Congress from limiting free speech but says nothing about the states.
  • The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified on July 9, 1868, changed this.
  • Gitlow v. New York (1925) incorporated First Amendment guarantees to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
  • Incorporation is the term for applying the Bill of Rights to individual states.
  • Legal cases typically involve monetary compensation.
  • Equity cases often involve an injunction.

Regulations

  • Regulations interpret and enforce laws.
  • Agencies create regulations to define vague parts of laws.
  • Congress can amend laws to override regulations.
  • Laws take precedence over regulations when there is a conflict.

Stare Decisis

  • Stare decisis means precedent controls legal decisions.
  • Courts must follow prior rulings from higher or equal courts unless a case is distinguishable.

Printing Press Impact

  • Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press.
  • The printing press allowed for mass production of written material, making speech regulation more critical.
  • The printing press made it more difficult to suppress speech by destroying books.

British Prior Restraint in Colonies

  • British prior restraint laws were less effective in the American colonies, because they were hard to enforce from far away.
  • Juries didn't like the idea of silencing speech before it was uttered.

State Action Doctrine

  • The State Action Doctrine says that the Constitution applies only to the government.
  • The Thirteenth Amendment is an exception, as it applies to everyone, so enslaving someone violates their constitutional rights, even if you aren't the government.

Prior Restraint

  • Prior restraint is a law that restricts speech before it is expressed through utterance or writing.

Symbolic Speech

  • Symbolic speech requires the actor to intend to convey a specific message.
  • Symbolic speech requires that the audience can reasonably understand the intended message.

1917 Espionage Act

  • The 1917 Espionage Act prohibited dissent and opposition to war, in addition to actual espionage.
  • Violating the Espionage Act carried a penalty of a $10,000 fine and up to 20 years in jail.

1918 Sedition Act

  • The 1918 Sedition Act prohibited disloyal or profane language intended to cause contempt for the government, Constitution, flag, or armed forces.
  • The penalty for violating the Sedition Act was a $10,000 fine and up to 20 years in jail.
  • In 2011, the Sedition Act was used against Julian Assange for disclosing government documents via WikiLeaks.
  • During World War I, the post office supported the Sedition Act by censoring newspapers, books, and pamphlets; some publications lost subsidized mailing rates.

Book Banning in Schools

  • The Eleventh Circuit ruled in 2009 that books about Cuba can be removed from Florida schools if they contain factual inaccuracies.
  • Book removals must be for legitimate pedagogical concerns, not to silence viewpoints.

Intentional Emotional Distress

  • Elements of intentional emotional distress include intentional, extreme, and outrageous acts that cause the plaintiff to experience severe emotional distress.

Brandenburg Test

  • The Brandenburg Test for incitement requires advocacy of imminent lawless action.
  • The Brandenburg Test requires that the threatened action poses a serious risk of harm.
  • The speaker must specifically intend the lawless action to occur.
  • The illegal action is likely to occur.

Defamation Elements

  • Defamation consists of:
    • Defamatory statements
    • Statements of and concerning the plaintiff
    • Publication
    • Falsity
    • Scienter
    • Actual damages to the plaintiff

Defamation Considerations

  • Public figures must prove malice (intentional or reckless disregard for the truth) to collect compensatory/punitive damages.
  • Private figures involved in public issues must prove negligence for compensatory damages and malice for punitive damages.
  • Private figures involved in private issues should refer to state common law to determine the burden of proof.

Tinker Test

  • The Tinker Test allows schools to regulate speech that disrupts the educational process.

Hazelwood Test

  • The Hazelwood Test applies to school newspapers substantially part of the curriculum in public high schools and below.
  • California's anti-Hazelwood statute protects school newspaper articles from prior restraint unless the content is obscene, libelous, slanderous, or disruptive.
  • The california law applies to public and charter schools.

Hosty Case and College Newspapers

  • The Hosty case asks:
    • Is the college newspaper a traditional public forum?
    • If not, apply the Hazelwood standard.
    • Is it a class or extracurricular activity?
    • Is the censorship necessary for legitimate pedagogical concern?
  • California's anti-Hosty statute prohibits censorship on college newspapers at public colleges and universities.

Alcohol Advertising in College Newspapers

  • Pitt News v. Pappert (Third Circuit): PA's Act 199, which restricted alcohol ads in college newspapers, violated the First Amendment.
  • Educational Media Co. at VA Tech v. Swecker (Fourth Circuit): restricting alcohol ads in college newspapers would be counter intuitive.

Restrictions on Speech

  • Public Forum: CNN's CHANNELS test: content-neutral, narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leaves open alternative channels.
  • Non-Public Forum: Viera Never Reads Anything Legitimate test: viewpoint-neutral, reasonably related to a legitimate government interest.
  • Private Forum: no test.

Clery Act

  • The Clery Act requires all universities that participate in federal student aid programs to provide timely warnings about significant emergencies or dangerous situations.
  • The Clery Act has been applied to private institutions by taking away their federal funding if they fail to comply.

Morse v. Frederick (2002)

  • In Morse v. Frederick, a high school principal suspended a student for displaying a "Bongs Hits 4 Jesus" banner.
  • The Supreme Court ruled that the school officials did not violate the First Amendment.
  • The Supreme Court decision was based on three legal determinations:
    • School speech doctrine applied because the speech occurred at a school event.
    • The speech was reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use.
    • A principal may legally restrict speech based on existing First Amendment precedents, school-related jurisprudence, and the school's interest in deterring drug use.

Damages in Tort vs. Contract Cases

  • Torts cases may award compensatory and punitive damages.
  • Breach of contract cases only award compensatory damages.

Defamation and Public Figures

  • In a defamation case, public officials or public figures must prove malice for both compensatory and punitive damages.
  • Private figures in matters of public concern must prove negligence for compensatory damages and malice for punitive damages.
  • Private figures in matters of strictly private concern should refer to state laws.

Libel Lawsuits

  • Libel lawsuits are sometimes brought for high amounts of money to attract attention.
  • Litigants may ask for a larger amount of money initially as even a reduced amount might be more than originally anticipated.

SLAPP Statutes

  • Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) are lawsuits that prevent the defendant from publishing harmful material, rather than for monetary compensation.
  • ANTI-SLAPP statutes (Citizen Participation Acts) allow the defendant to ask the judge to dismiss the lawsuit outright.

Communications Decency Act

  • The Communications Decency Act of 1996 states that interactive computer services should not be treated as the publisher of information provided by another content provider.
  • The Communications Decency Act protects content providers like Amazon.com from liability for false statements in books they sell.

Libel Lawsuits in Great Britain

  • Americans sometimes prefer to bring libel lawsuits in Great Britain, because it is generally easier to win.
  • "Libel tourism" involves suing in British courts because it would be too hard to win in the U.S.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

More Like This

Legal Systems Overview
10 questions
Categories of Law: Civil vs. Common, Criminal & More
20 questions
Civil Law vs. Common Law
10 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser