Untitled Quiz
32 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What level of fault must a public official prove in a defamation case?

  • Strict Liability
  • Negligence
  • Simple Mistake
  • Actual Malice (correct)
  • Under the law, what must a private person prove in cases involving matters of public concern?

  • Intentional Infliction
  • Actual Malice
  • Falsity (correct)
  • Presumed Harm
  • What is the primary purpose of the USA PATRIOT Act?

  • To promote international trade
  • To enhance law enforcement's ability to surveil (correct)
  • To protect individual privacy rights
  • To strengthen corporate regulations
  • What kind of surveillance methods are associated with global surveillance implications on journalists?

    <p>Pegasus and Prism</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case established the requirement of actual malice for public figures in defamation cases?

    <p>Curtis Publishing v. Butts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    For a private person, what is generally required to prove in cases relating to matters of private concern?

    <p>Simple Negligence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) primarily focus on?

    <p>Surveillance of foreign powers and agents</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a significant implication of mass surveillance as highlighted by Edward Snowden's revelations?

    <p>Threats to personal privacy</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must private plaintiffs prove in defamation cases regarding matters of private concern?

    <p>Falsity of the statement</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements correctly describes the differences in states' approaches to private concern libel cases?

    <p>Some states require proof of falsity and others do not</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the distinction between opinion and fact in defamation cases?

    <p>Opinions are subjective and cannot be proven true or false, unlike facts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements about data protection laws is true?

    <p>Data protection laws vary significantly between the U.S. and EU</p> Signup and view all the answers

    From where does the right to privacy originate?

    <p>State constitutions and common law</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is not considered a privacy tort?

    <p>Defamation per se</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes intellectual property (IP) law?

    <p>It encompasses various types of creative works, inventions, and symbols</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What constitutional source primarily provides for the protection of intellectual property?

    <p>The Copyright Clause of the Constitution</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case established that prior restraints on the press are generally unconstitutional?

    <p>New York Times Company v. United States</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What legal concept is particularly associated with challenges to government censorship of the press?

    <p>Prior Restraints</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a public figure must prove actual malice to win a defamation claim?

    <p>Curtis Publishing Company v. Butts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the key issue in the case of Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises?

    <p>Fair Use of Copyrighted Material</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case directly involved the Espionage Act of 1917 in the context of press freedom?

    <p>U.S. v. The Progressive Inc.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What precedent did Gertz v. Robert Welch Inc. set regarding defamation laws?

    <p>It established different standards for public and private figures.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case highlighted the implications of confidential information supplied by news sources?

    <p>Branzburg v. Hayes</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case was pivotal in shaping the understanding of public figures in defamation law?

    <p>Curtis Publishing Company v. Butts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the term 'work-for-hire' imply regarding copyright ownership?

    <p>The hiring party owns the copyright from the moment of creation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be considered when evaluating fair use?

    <p>The market impact of the use on the original work.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main purpose of shield laws?

    <p>To allow journalists to keep sources confidential.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What are the potential consequences for a freelancer who does not have a written agreement about copyright ownership?

    <p>They may lose rights to the work entirely.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is typically NOT a benefit of registering for copyright protection?

    <p>Automatic acceptance as a work for hire.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does promissory estoppel rely on?

    <p>A promise that induces reliance by another party.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a common type of infringement in copyright law?

    <p>Unauthorized reproduction of a protected work.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why do journalists need to protect their sources?

    <p>To maintain the trust and confidentiality of their sources.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Media Law Exam 2 Study Guide

    • Weeks Covered: Weeks 8-13 cover defamation, fair use, freedom of speech, prior restraints, confidential sources, work product, and copyright.

    Dr. Sanders' Study Guide

    • Fair-game Cases: Legal cases involving the balance between national security and the public's right to know.

    • U.S. v. The Progressive Inc. (1979): This case concerned an injunction to prevent the publication of a story about the Atomic Energy Act, specifically the H-Bomb Secret article. The government claimed the information would reveal national secrets and assist in the construction of a fusion bomb, even though it was compiled from publicly available sources. The court ruled the publication could proceed.

    • New York Times Co. v. United States (1971): Also known as the Pentagon Papers case, this case involved the Nixon administration's attempt to prevent the NYT and WaPo from publishing documents related to the Vietnam War. The Supreme Court ultimately decided against the government, stating there was no immediate, direct, and inevitable harm from publishing the information.

    • New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964): This case established the standard of "actual malice" for public figures in libel cases. The Court held that to be liable, a public figure had to prove the statement was false and made with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard (actual malice).

    • Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts (1967): This case, concerning a published article that accused two football coaches of conspiring to fix a game, further clarified the definition and application of "actual malice."

    • Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974): This case distinguished between public figures and private individuals in libel cases, essentially granting more protection to private individuals (negligence standard).

    • Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps (1986): The ruling changed the burden of proof, requiring the plaintiff to show falsity in a libel case.

    • Branzburg v. Hayes (1972): Established that the First Amendment does not grant journalists an absolute privilege to refuse to testify before a grand jury; no qualified privilege was created, and the public interest is taken into account.

    • Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. (1991): This case concerned whether the First Amendment barred a plaintiff from recovering damages under state promissory estoppel law in a situation involving a newspaper breach of a confidentiality agreement with a source. The Court held that the First Amendment did not bar a promissory estoppel suit against the media.

    • Eldred v. Ashcroft (2003): This case upheld the constitutionality of the Copyright Term Extension Act, which extended the terms of copyright protection.

    • Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises (1985): The Court discussed fair use, ruling that the Nation's unauthorized use of copyrighted material from a manuscript was not fair use, especially not the large amount of text.

    • Prior Restraints: Government restrictions on speech before it's released to the public. Usually considered unconstitutional unless national security or other compelling interest outweighs freedom of speech.

    • Espionage Act (1917), Patriot Act (2001), Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (1978): Laws affecting government surveillance of individuals and communications, focusing on whether and how warrantless surveillance may be legal.

    • Fair Use: A limited use of copyrighted material without permission, permitted under specific conditions (purpose, nature, amount, effect)

    • Defamation: A false statement that hurts someone's reputation.

    • Libel: Written defamation.

    • Slander: Spoken defamation.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    More Like This

    Untitled Quiz
    6 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    AdoredHealing avatar
    AdoredHealing
    Untitled Quiz
    37 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    WellReceivedSquirrel7948 avatar
    WellReceivedSquirrel7948
    Untitled Quiz
    55 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    StatuesquePrimrose avatar
    StatuesquePrimrose
    Untitled Quiz
    50 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    JoyousSulfur avatar
    JoyousSulfur
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser